Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000945
Original file (20150000945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000945 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be allowed to enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was married on 8 December 2013 and went to the retirement services office at Fort Rucker, Alabama to enroll his new spouse in the SBP on 19 December 2013.  He goes on to state that he understood the counselor to say that he had to wait until his first anniversary but it appears that he meant that he had to enroll before his first anniversary.  Accordingly, he requests that he be allowed to enroll his spouse in the SBP.  

3.  The applicant provides a one-page letter explaining his application and copies of his SBP Election Change Certificate and his marriage license. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving as a construction equipment operator in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) when he was deployed to Kuwait during the period 20061016 – 20071008.

2\.  On 29 November 2011, he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 100% disability rating in the pay grade of E-4.  At the time of his placement on the TDRL he indicated that he had no beneficiaries.

3.  The applicant married his current spouse in Florida on 8 December 2013 and on 19 December 2013, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate) at the Fort Rucker Retirement Services Office (RSO) electing spouse only at the full retired rate.  The form was witnessed by the SBP counselor.

4.  He was removed from the TDRL on 10 December 2014 and was permanently retired with a 100% disability rating on 11 December 2014. 

5.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving family members.

6.  Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976, but effective 1 October 1976, reduced the waiting period for a new spouse's eligibility from 2 years to 1 year following post-retirement marriage.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant admits that he misunderstood the instructions he received regarding when he could enroll his spouse in the SBP, it is apparent that when he went to the RSO to enroll his spouse it was his intent to do so at the time based on his having completed the election form.

2.  It is also noted that the applicant was on the TDRL at the time he attempted to enroll his spouse and was subsequently permanently retired.  However, there is no indication that any effort was made to ensure he was properly enrolled in the SBP.

3.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show that he made a timely notification to DFAS on 1 January 2014 that he was married and that he made a spouse only SBP election based on full retired pay.






BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant made a timely notification to DFAS on 1 January 2014 that he was married and that he made a spouse only SBP election based on full retired pay.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000945





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000945



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015283

    Original file (20140015283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 2656-6, dated 17 June 2014, which shows he elected to change his SBP coverage from child only to spouse and children, at the full retired pay level. An email from RSO, Fort Jackson, SC, initiated 17 June 2014, wherein the RSO requests that the applicant's SBP coverage election be changed due to remarriage. c. A letter from the DFAS representative, dated 18 June 2014, wherein the applicant's request for modification of his SBP coverage was denied because the election was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005196

    Original file (20130005196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 5 October 2009, shows he elected children coverage, full retired pay. He provides a DD Form 2656-6, dated 28 November 2012, which shows he elected to change his SBP coverage to spouse and children, full retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant made a written request on 1 December 2011 to change his SBP election to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005325

    Original file (20140005325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 January 2014, DFAS advised the applicant that his SBP request to add his spouse could not be accepted because he failed to notify them prior to his first-year anniversary. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he submitted a request to add his spouse to his SBP on 1 August 2012 and his request was received and processed in a timely manner. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140005325 3 ARMY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009333

    Original file (20120009333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner and correction of his daughter's date of birth (DOB) that is recorded in his finance record. Additionally, on 6 November 2012, an official at DFAS confirmed there was no record that the applicant requested enrollment in the SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of his date of marriage. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022514

    Original file (20120022514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant, upon his retirement, completed a DD Form 2656, wherein he elected "children only" SBP coverage. He became eligible to make a change in SBP election from "children only" coverage to "spouse and children" coverage within 1 year of his marriage (15 June 2012). When he failed to change his SBP coverage to add his spouse within 1 year of their marriage, he irrevocably forfeited future spouse coverage except during a Congressionally-approved open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012339

    Original file (20140012339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was not required to select SBP coverage at the time of retirement from active Army service because he was a single Soldier. The applicant contends he should be allowed to enroll in the SBP for spouse only coverage because he was not aware that he had only one year from the time of marriage to make such an election. The sincerity of the applicant's contention is not in question; however, there is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014707

    Original file (20090014707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the applicant that she had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The evidence of record also shows she submitted a DD Form 2656 on 25 February 2009 wherein she elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, not to participate in the SBP. However, by law, her spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date she made this election but prior to the date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018320

    Original file (20120018320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, prior to marriage to his current spouse he went to Retirement Services and he was told he had to wait until he had been married for 1 year to sign his wife up for survivor benefits. The evidence of record shows the applicant was not married when he elected child only SBP coverage based on full gross retired pay on 14 September 2010. Following marriage to his current spouse on 2 May 2011, he had a 1 year period to make an election to add his spouse as an SBP beneficiary.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001439

    Original file (20120001439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. Records show that during the applicant's retirement processing in 1995 he completed an application for retired pay. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of their marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019254

    Original file (20140019254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he spoke with a technician at the Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS), Retired Pay Branch * he was instructed to provide them with a DD Form 2656-6 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate) and a memorandum explaining his request * he was told that once he provided the information he would be approved for SBP enrollment * he provided the requested information and DFAS denied his enrollment due to the statute of limitations * he was told that his...