Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018320
Original file (20120018320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:  30 APRIL 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120018320 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be changed from "Child Only" to "Spouse Only," following his marriage to his current spouse in a timely manner.

2.  He states, in effect, prior to marriage to his current spouse he went to Retirement Services and he was told he had to wait until he had been married for 1 year to sign his wife up for survivor benefits.  He waited 1 year as he was told and he went in to complete the paperwork changing his SBP election to include his current spouse and the paperwork was lost.  He then called in and was told they had no record of it.  On 19 September 2012, he called the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and he was told he was ineligible to sign his wife up.  DFAS told him that he was given the wrong information.  He had to sign his wife up right after he got married and that he had a 1 year grace period before the benefits kicked in.  Now his wife is unable to get his survivor annuity due to the error of Fort Drum Retirement Services.

3.  He provides:

* two divorce decrees
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel)
* DD Forms 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate), dated 10 May 2012 and 27 July 2012


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he retired from the Regular Army on 31 December 2010, in the rank/grade of sergeant first class/E-7, after completing more than 20 years of active service.

2.  He submits a copy of a divorce decree showing he was divorced on 15 April 2008.

3.  On 14 September 2010, he elected child only SBP coverage, based on his full gross pay for a child born on 17 April 2000.

4.  He submits a copy of a DD Form 2656-6 showing his SBP coverage at the time of completion of the form was child only.  He marked he was requesting a change in coverage based on marriage.  The form shows he elected spouse only coverage based on his full retired pay.  The form shows it was signed by him and a witness on 10 May 2012.  It shows his spouse's name and a date of marriage of 2 May 2011.

5.  He submits a second DD Form 2656-6 showing his SBP coverage at the time of completion of the form was child only.  He marked he was requesting a change in coverage based on remarriage.  The form shows he elected spouse only coverage based on his full retired pay.  The form shows it was signed by him on 27 July 2012.  It is void of a witness signature.  It shows his spouse's name and a date of marriage as 2 May 2011.  It is noted that he did not submit a copy of a marriage license/certificate.

6.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  It provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.  An election, once made, is permanent and irrevocable except as provided for by law.

7.  Issues of Army Echoes (the Army bulletin published and provided to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army), consistently contain a reminder to retirees that they are responsible for updating their retired pay file, using the Kentucky mailing address provided, within 1 year of the event if they marry, remarry, have a child, are widowed or divorced and need to make or update a SBP election.  The May - August 2011 edition (within the 1 year anniversary of his marriage) highlighted this reminder.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child, may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was not married when he elected child only SBP coverage based on full gross retired pay on 14 September 2010.

2.  Following marriage to his current spouse on 2 May 2011, he had a 1 year period to make an election to add his spouse as an SBP beneficiary.  There is no evidence to confirm he submitted an SBP election during that period or that DFAS received such an election.

3.  He contends he was not properly counseled, in effect, causing him to not make an election to enroll his spouse in the SBP within 1 year of their marriage.  However, he would have received the Army Echoes bulletin which reminded retirees if they married or remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting the DFAS.  Retired Pay Newsletters also provided these reminders.  He also could have had any questions concerning the SBP clarified by calling a Retirement Services Officer or DFAS.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.  Congress has authorized open enrollment periods for the SBP in the past.  There is no way of knowing whether another open enrollment period will be established in the future; however, in the event that this does occur Army Echoes may announce the beginning of the SBP open enrollment period and he may be able to change his election at that time.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed the applicant’s contention that he was improperly counseled on when he should add his spouse to his SBP.  He married on 2 May 2011, and on 10 May 2012 only 8 days after his first anniversary, he attempted to enroll her in his SBP.  That short period of time after his first anniversary lends credence to his contention.

2.  As a result, the Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he elected to add spouse coverage to his SBP in a timely manner.




      _______ _  X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018320



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018320



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022514

    Original file (20120022514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant, upon his retirement, completed a DD Form 2656, wherein he elected "children only" SBP coverage. He became eligible to make a change in SBP election from "children only" coverage to "spouse and children" coverage within 1 year of his marriage (15 June 2012). When he failed to change his SBP coverage to add his spouse within 1 year of their marriage, he irrevocably forfeited future spouse coverage except during a Congressionally-approved open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002623

    Original file (20090002623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Navy on 20 November 1984 and served four years. Issues of Army Echoes (the Army bulletin published three times a year and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army), consistently contain a reminder to retirees that they are responsible for updating their retired pay file, using the Kentucky mailing address provided, within one year of the event if they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003452

    Original file (20090003452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003452 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that a military retiree can have a portion of his or her monthly retired pay withheld in order to provide, after his or her death, a monthly survivor benefit to a surviving spouse, child(ren), or other eligible recipient(s). On remarriage a retiree may elect SBP spouse coverage for the first spouse acquired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018128

    Original file (20140018128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The official replied that he had 12 months from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse into SBP, that he could no longer enroll her, and that he would have to wait for the next "SBP Open Enrollment" that is offered every so often. A DFAS official provided, in pertinent part, two letters to the applicant from DFAS, Retired and Annuitant Pay, London, KY, that show: * on 5 July 2012, he was informed that his letter, dated 11 May 2012, was received; however his request for SBP could not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014175

    Original file (20130014175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An election to terminate spouse coverage under this law, once made, is irrevocable. When he and Maureen were divorced, the coverage did not change but the spouse premiums were suspended. The applicant does not now have the option to terminate his SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011300

    Original file (20080011300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant married on 8 May 1999. The FSM married the applicant in May 1999. However, the Army Echoes issued at the time he married the applicant reminded retirees that if they remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting DFAS, clearly indicating that an SBP election could be made upon remarriage and clearly implying that the new wife could be covered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016016

    Original file (20130016016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This letter further informed him that by law, he had only 90 calendar days from the date he received this letter to submit his DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate). The applicant's records do not indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter, and it appears he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001439

    Original file (20120001439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. Records show that during the applicant's retirement processing in 1995 he completed an application for retired pay. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of their marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013841

    Original file (20110013841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was informed he could elect to enroll his current spouse in the SBP by filing out the appropriate forms. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1995, permitted a previously participating retiree upon remarriage to elect not to resume spouse coverage or to increase reduced coverage for the latter spouse (requiring a payback with interest of SBP premiums prior to the first anniversary of the remarriage). This statement shows whether or not SBP premiums are being deducted from a retiree's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000229

    Original file (20150000229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he served his country over 20 years, first in the Marine Corps and then in the New Jersey Army National Guard (NJARNG); he is also a Vietnam Veteran * he received his 20-year letter on 10 February 1993 and he was not married at the time; therefore, he declined RCSBP * he received no advice regarding the steps he should take in the event he did marry * prior to his 60th birthday, in 2007, he applied for a non-regular retirement through his unit; once again...