Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001439
Original file (20120001439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001439 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner.

2.  The applicant states that when he and his wife were married he enrolled her in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS).  At the time, he was told that "SBP was automatic"; however, he found out later that was not the case.  He adds that he submitted an application and a copy of his marriage certificate to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to enroll his spouse in the SBP; but it was not accepted.  He requests an exception to the policy.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a State of Texas Marriage Certificate that shows he married C---- L-- H---- on 22 April 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 November 1973.  He attained the rank of sergeant first class/pay grade E-7 on 1 January 1985.

2.  A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), completed by the applicant on 1 February 1995, shows that he indicated with the entry "N/A" that he had no spouse or dependent children.  It also shows in Section VII (SBP 


Election - See your SBP counselor before making an election), item 28 (Beneficiary Categories), that he placed an "X" in box g (I elect not to participate in SBP.  I do not have eligible dependents under the plan).  The applicant also placed his signature on the document.

3.  A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant was honorably retired from active duty on 30 April 1995 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired).  

4.  In connection with the processing of this case, coordination was made with DFAS.  A DFAS official confirmed there was no record that the applicant requested enrollment in the SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of marriage.  However, the applicant submitted a letter to DFAS with his marriage certificate on 8 October 2011. 

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Retiring members and spouses were to be informed of the SBP options and effects.

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5), provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

7.  Army Echoes is the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.  Every issue, beginning before April 2007, contains the warning or a similarly-worded warning, “Remember:  You are responsible for updating your retired pay file information at DFAS-CL (Use KY mailing address below) within one year of the event if you marry, remarry, have a child, are widowed or divorced and need to make or update a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he enrolled his spouse in the SBP in a timely manner because he enrolled her in DEERS he was told that "SBP was automatic."

2.  Records show that during the applicant's retirement processing in 1995 he completed an application for retired pay.  He indicated he had no dependents and elected not to participate in SBP.

3.  The applicant retired from active duty on 30 April 1995.  He was married on 22 April 2007.

4.  The sincerity of the applicant's contention is not in question.  However, there is no independent evidence to show he was advised that his wife was automatically enrolled in SBP when he enrolled her in DEERS.  Further, Army Echoes warns retirees that it is their responsibility to notify DFAS within one year of marriage if they need to make an SBP election.

5.  There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of their marriage.

6.  The governing law is clear in that a person who is not married, but who later marries, may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries.  The applicant failed to make such an election within 1 year after the date on which
he was married.

7.  Regrettably, in view of all of the foregoing, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records to show he enrolled in the SBP with spouse only coverage.

8.  The applicant is advised that, on occasion, the U.S. Congress enacts into legislation an SBP Open Season.  For example, Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006.  It required that enrollees live 2 years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  It required the retiree to pay monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium covering all costs that would have been paid for the election if it had been made at the first opportunity to do so.  Thus, the applicant is encouraged to monitor military media and/or websites in the event an SBP Open Season is enacted into law in the future.

9.  The applicant is also advised that he may wish to contact the nearest Retirement Services Officer (RSO) for additional information and assistance regarding SBP.  A listing of RSOs by country, state, and installation is available on the Internet at: http://www.armyg1.army.mil/RSO/rso.asp.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001439



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001439



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009333

    Original file (20120009333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner and correction of his daughter's date of birth (DOB) that is recorded in his finance record. Additionally, on 6 November 2012, an official at DFAS confirmed there was no record that the applicant requested enrollment in the SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of his date of marriage. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019127

    Original file (20080019127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he has tried unsuccessfully to correct his record to show enrollment in the SBP, with spouse coverage, since the date of his marriage, on 9 April 2005. On 17 July 2008, by letter, DFAS notified the applicant that a review of his retired pay account indicated he had elected SBP for child(ren) coverage since he had no eligible spouse at the time of his retirement from the Regular Army. In his letter the applicant stated, in effect, that he married, on 9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022514

    Original file (20120022514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant, upon his retirement, completed a DD Form 2656, wherein he elected "children only" SBP coverage. He became eligible to make a change in SBP election from "children only" coverage to "spouse and children" coverage within 1 year of his marriage (15 June 2012). When he failed to change his SBP coverage to add his spouse within 1 year of their marriage, he irrevocably forfeited future spouse coverage except during a Congressionally-approved open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018531

    Original file (20130018531.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was single at the time and he made an SBP election for children only coverage. Therefore, as a matter of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he enrolled his spouse in the SBP within 1 year of his marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant made a voluntary change in his SBP election from child only to spouse and child on 10 July 2008 and that the request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011701

    Original file (20110011701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 8 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110011701 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He was asked about his SBP election at that time and he elected spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows the first time the applicant requested a change to his RCSBP election to spouse coverage was when he applied for retired pay on 11 March 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011300

    Original file (20080011300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant married on 8 May 1999. The FSM married the applicant in May 1999. However, the Army Echoes issued at the time he married the applicant reminded retirees that if they remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting DFAS, clearly indicating that an SBP election could be made upon remarriage and clearly implying that the new wife could be covered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018128

    Original file (20140018128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The official replied that he had 12 months from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse into SBP, that he could no longer enroll her, and that he would have to wait for the next "SBP Open Enrollment" that is offered every so often. A DFAS official provided, in pertinent part, two letters to the applicant from DFAS, Retired and Annuitant Pay, London, KY, that show: * on 5 July 2012, he was informed that his letter, dated 11 May 2012, was received; however his request for SBP could not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003841C070205

    Original file (20060003841C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records at DFAS show the applicant enrolled in the SBP for NIP coverage on 1 September 1973 during the first Open Season. As a retiree, the applicant should have been receiving Army Echoes, which provided information on five SBP Open Seasons conducted after he was married. Nevertheless, at the time of the applicant’s retirement in July 1972, he was a private E-2 and was probably unaware of his responsibility to change his SBP coverage when he married in 1975.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004861

    Original file (20120004861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He retired on 29 February 1972 and was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC on 1 March 1972. Public Law 97-35, enacted on 12 August 1981, established an open enrollment season for SBP from 1 October 1981-30 September 1982. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence.