Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000569
Original file (20150000569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000569 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal from his official military personnel file (OMPF) of the following documents:

* DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data) dated 30 April 2009
* DD Form 93 dated 15 April 2010
* SGLV Form 8286 (E) (Servicemen's Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate) dated 30 April 2009
* SGLV Form 8286 (E) dated 15 April 2010

2.  The applicant states, in effect: 

	a.  He completed the first DD Form 93 at a point where he was still very new to the Army.  In item 4a (Spouse Name) it incorrectly states "Interlocutory Decree."  This entry normally refers to a court-ordered spousal support or separation agreement.  In fact, he was single at the time this form was completed, and had never been married.

	b.  He entered his first marriage on 22 June 2014, and his marriage license shows both his single status and that this was his first marriage.

	c.  The incorrect DD Form 93 has been superseded by a more recent version.  This is also true of the SGLV Forms 8286 contained in his OMPF.  These superseded forms are both inaccurate and serve no purpose in his file and he therefore requests their removal.

	d.  He states that if warranted he would like to appear before the Board to plead his case. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 93 dated 30 April 2009
* Oregon Health, Application, License, and Record of Marriage
* email correspondence with the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (IPERMS) Support Team, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a Regular Army officer in the Judge Advocate General's Corps on 26 October 2008.  He has served in various units in the Army, to include a deployment to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom from on or about 1 June 2010 to on or about 30 June 2011.

2.  His records contain three DD Forms 93 and three SGLV Forms 8286.  Item 4a of the DD Form 93 dated 30 April 2009 contains the entry "Interlocutory Decree."  Also in his records is a marriage certificate from the State of Oregon dated 22 June 2014.  The marriage certificate shows his previous marital status as single. 

3.  The applicant provides email correspondence he had with the IPERMS Support Team at HRC which essentially shows his request to HRC to remove the documents at issue and their citing of the regulation requiring their retention.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resources Records Management) prescribes policy and procedures for the filing of documents in the OMPF.  It states:

	a.  Only documents pertaining to a Soldier's military career per appendices B and C will be filed in the OMPF.  Once properly filed, the document will not be removed from the record unless directed by Boards such as the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.

	b.  Both the DD Form 93 and SGLV Form 8286 are required to be filed in the OMPF.

5.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions regarding an applicant's request for the correction of a military record.  It provides, in pertinent part, that applicants do not have a right to a hearing before the ABCMR.  The Director of the ABCMR may grant a formal hearing whenever justice requires.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the application indicates the applicant's desire to appear before the Board, there are sufficient records available for a fair and impartial review in this case without such an appearance.

2.  The applicant's request for removal of the superseded and inaccurate versions of his DD Form 93 and SGLV Forms 8286 was carefully considered; however, the evidence presented was not sufficient to warrant removal of these documents.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice in the filing of these documents, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be removed.  While it is understandable that he desires to show he had no prior marriages in his military records, this is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.

4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in his OMPF.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding his status at the time the first DD Form 93 was completed and at the time of his marriage.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000569



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000569



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028902

    Original file (20100028902.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    g. The applicant provides a timeline summarizing the events, as follows: * 3 April 2010 – applicant and FSM married * 19 April 2010 – FSM's SRP packet completed, including a DD Form 93 designating the applicant as primary beneficiary for the DG, burial expenses, unpaid P&A, and PADD of the FSM's remains * 4 June 2010 – FSM deployed to Afghanistan * 16 September 2010 – FSM died in combat in southern Afghanistan * 17 September 2010 – FSM's commanding officer and battalion S-1 indicate FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008125

    Original file (20130008125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On the same date, the FSM completed an SGLV 8286 wherein he elected SGLI coverage in the amount of $200,000.00. The unit's S1 shop has a record of the FSM's updated SGLV 8286 from 16 November 2011 showing he elected coverage of $200,000.00. For military personnel, the SGLI is recorded on an SGLV 8286.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024736

    Original file (20100024736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant's OMPF contains a DD Form 93 and an SGLV-8268 of another Soldier that are incorrectly filed in his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. removing the DD Form 93, dated 14 February 2007, and SGLV-8268, dated 14 February 2007, belonging to SFC D____ from his OMPF and b. ensuring the copies of the DD Form 93 and SGLV-8268 he submitted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007956

    Original file (20110007956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On the same date, the FSM completed an SGLV 8286 wherein he elected SGLI coverage in the amount of $100,000.00. Since the SGLV 8286 completed and signed by the FSM on 11 February 2009 did not serve to increase his coverage amount, but only to update his beneficiaries, the $100,000.00 of SGLI coverage remained in effect. The evidence of records shows when the FSM completed his initial SGLV 8286 in November 2008 he elected SGLV coverage in the amount of $100,000.00 and named his sister and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005606

    Original file (20130005606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 May 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130005606 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of SGLV 8286A (Servicemen's Group Life Insurance (SGLI) Family Coverage Election) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicable regulation states that the SGLV 8286A is an approved document for filing in the AMHRR and/or iPERMs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019004

    Original file (20130019004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SGLV 8286 forms dated 16 November 2009 and 13 January 2010, contained in his OMPF and also provided by the applicant, show the FSM elected to be automatically insured for the full amount of insurance of $400,000.00 with the applicant named as his beneficiary. Unfortunately, the evidence of record confirms that the latest completed SGLI form in the FSM's OMPF is dated 29 October 2010 wherein he elected reduced SGLI coverage of $200,000.00. The evidence of record shows on 16 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002816

    Original file (20120002816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided orders 272-03, dated 29 September 2009, which promoted him to SGT/E-5, effective 1 October 2009. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). His record shows he was a promotable SPC/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019619

    Original file (20080019619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record further shows despite his intent to marry the applicant, as evidenced by their request for a marriage license, the FSM completed an updated DD Form 93, on 9 November 2008, designating his mother as the beneficiary of his unpaid pay and allowances. The evidence of record also shows that the FSM and the applicant were married on 17 November 2008 and were issued a marriage certificate on 17 November 2008. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the applicant changed his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005473

    Original file (20120005473.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * the subject OER (it was not provided, but was obtained from the Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS)) * OER for the period 20080325 - 20090324 * a 19 April 2010 memorandum for record (MFR) from the investigating officer (IO) who conducted the CI into the incorrect DA Form 31 * his DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 27 July 2009, given to the IO * U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) Form 91-R (Foreign Travel Briefing Statement) * Four...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013654

    Original file (20100013654.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provides the following: * DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 22 March 2010 and 20 April 2010 * DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty), dated 23 May 2006 * DD Form 2064 (Certificate of Death (Overseas)), dated 27 October 2005 * 17 December 2002 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * SGLV 8286, dated 21 May 1999, 11 May 2001, 4 June 2001, and 15 December 2004 * DD Form 93/DD Form 93-E (Record of Emergency Data) dated, 21 May 1999, 13 December 1999, 4 June 2001,...