Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002816
Original file (20120002816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120002816 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states he did not get promoted before outprocessing due to stop loss.  He wants to correct his records so he can enlist in the Reserves as an E-5.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) for a check dated 6 July 2011
* Orders 272-03, issued by Headquarters, 20th Engineer Brigade, Fort Bragg, NC, dated 29 September 2009

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 30 March 2006.  No prior service is indicated on his enlistment contract.

2.  He was discharged from the USAR DEP on 19 April 2006 and he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and 16 weeks on 20 April 2006.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 21B (Combat Engineer).

3.  His record shows he was promoted to private first class (PFC)/E-3 on 20 April 2007 and SPC/E-4 on 1 November 2007.  He served in Afghanistan from 30 October 2006 to 9 March 2007 and Kuwait/Iraq from 27 May 2009 to 25 May 2010.  He was assigned to the 37th Engineer Battalion, Fort Bragg.

4.  He completed the Warrior Leader Course at the Noncommissioned Officer Academy, Fort Bragg, from 1 through 16 October 2008.

5.  The applicant provided orders 272-03, dated 29 September 2009, which promoted him to SGT/E-5, effective 1 October 2009.  However, these orders are not filed in his official military personnel file (OMPF).  Additionally, all documents in his record show he held the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 at the time of his separation, such as:

* DA Form 1695 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment), dated 21 June 2010
* SGLV Form 8286 (E) (Servicemember's Group Life Insurance Election and Certificates), dated 15 June 2010
* DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist For Active Component Service Members), dated 16 June 2010
* Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 1 July 2010

6.  The applicant's historical personnel data residing with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) database shows he was flagged for adverse action on 9 August 2009 and that his flag was removed on 1 February 2010 with code "AD" indicating disciplinary action was taken.  

7.  Orders 182-0276, issued by the U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Bragg, dated 1 July 2010, ordered the applicant to report to the U.S. Army Transition Center, Fort Bragg on 2 July 2010 for transition processing.  These orders show his REFRAD date as
7 September 2010.  These orders also listed his rank as "SPC."

8.  He was honorably released from active duty on 7 September 2010 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) by reason of completion of required service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 4 years, 4 months, and
18 days of creditable active service. This form also shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - "SPC"
* item 4b (Pay Grade) - "E-4"
* item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) - "2007  11  01"

9.  He also submitted a copy of a DFAS LES for the period 6 July 2011 that shows he served in the USAR and his rank is shown as E-5.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served on active duty from 20 April 2006 through 7 September 2010.  His record shows he was a promotable SPC/E-4.  He provides a copy of orders promoting him to SGT/E-5, effective 1 October 2009, yet, no record of this order exists in his OMPF.  

2.  His HRC historical personnel data shows he was flagged for adverse action on 9 August 2009 and that his flag was removed on 1 February 2010 with code "AD" indicating disciplinary action was taken.  Additionally, all documents subsequent to 1 October 2009, including his service extension document, insurance certificate, pre-separation counseling, separation orders, and DD Form 214 show his rank/grade as SPC/E-4.  This is an indication that those promotion orders were revoked.

3.  There are many inconsistencies in his record and in the absence of additional corroborating evidence confirming his promotion prior to his release from active duty there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  _____x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002816



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002816



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015646

    Original file (20100015646.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 17 September 2002 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic). The evidence of record shows he was recommended for promotion to SGT by a battalion promotion board. However, since he was in a promotable status and on a valid promotion list at the time of retirement for disability, he was entitled to retirement at the promotion list grade, effective the date before placement on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013014

    Original file (20120013014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2009, he was retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) paragraph 4-24b(2), due to disability, temporary. The grade or rank in which he/she is serving on the date when his/her name is placed on the TDRL or, if his/her name was not carried on that list, on the date when he/she is retired. This was not done because the applicant had been promoted to SGT/E-5; it was done because the law allows a member to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009146

    Original file (20140009146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant does not provide any evidence. His records do not show and he does not provide any documentary evidence that shows he appeared before a battalion promotion board. There is nothing in the applicant's records and he provides no evidence that shows he appeared before a battalion promotion board, or that shows his name was incorporated on a promotion list.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009869

    Original file (20080009869.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080009869 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 17 May 2007 be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/ E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016491

    Original file (20140016491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired as a sergeant (SGT) in pay grade E-5. His record does not contain any documentation showing he was recommended for or promoted to SGT during his active duty service nor is there any record of NJP. In addition, he received a second flag effective 16 September 2013 for an adverse action which also made him ineligible for promotion consideration to SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028858

    Original file (20100028858.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. He also provides: * a Certificate of Retirement showing his rank as SPC * a memorandum, dated 2 September 2009, and Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2009, from DFAS showing his rank as SGT * a Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 17 June 2010, showing his DOB as 8 March 1984 and his rank as SGT 13. He states his DOB is 8 March 1984; however, his record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016292

    Original file (20090016292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent orders show the applicant was awarded two Army Achievement Medals for service or achievement, which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards. The evidence of record shows he was issued permanent orders on 28 April 2009 promoting him to SGT/E-5 on 1 May 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from items 4a, 4b,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011786

    Original file (20120011786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states due to administrative errors in her unit, she had problems maintaining her promotable status after beginning a medical evaluation board (MEB) when her Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) expired under the new promotion system in June 2011. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003694

    Original file (20080003694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 January 2007, the 502nd Personnel Services Battalion (PSB) published Orders Number 025-04 promoting the applicant to SSG/E-6 with an effective date and date of rank of 1 December 2006. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 effective 1 June 2004. However, it is presumed that the 502nd PSB was unaware that he had been reduced to SPC/E-4 at the time of publication of his promotion orders to SSG/E-6 and was ineligible for promotion to this rank without...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003683

    Original file (20150003683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003683 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of the previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision in Docket Number AR20140009146 on 22 October 2014. While the evidence he provides does show he attended a promotion board and was on a promotion list, it still doesn't conclusively show he remained eligible on the date he contends he should have...