Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140011197
Original file (AR20140011197 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011197 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from military service.

2.  The applicant states he retired in November 2004 after completing more than 30 years of active duty service in the Regular Army (RA).  He states that he met the eligibility criteria of serving on active duty for a minimum of 90 days and at least 36 cumulative months after 10 September 2001 before he honorably retired from active duty.  However, he was never informed of the rules and regulations associated with transferring his remaining educational benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement.  He adds that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted him service connection for his disabilities that are rated at 70 percent.

3.  The applicant provides a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), dated 12 June 2014, and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the RA on 4 November 1974.  Through a series of reenlistments in the RA, he continued to serve on active duty.  He attained the rank of sergeant major/pay grade E-9 on 1 May 1997.

3.  A DD Form 214 shows the applicant was honorably retired from active duty on 30 November 2004, based on sufficient service for retirement, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired) effective 1 December 2004.  He had completed 30 years and 27 days of total active duty service.

4.  Public Law 110-252 (Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008) provides the authority for members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 (emphasis added) to transfer unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  This public law amended Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 1606, section 16132a, to show that subject to regulation prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary concerned may permit a member who is entitled to basic educational assistance under this chapter to elect to transfer entitlement to unused educational benefits to one or more of the specified family members.

	a.  The law identified the qualifying Title 10 and Title 32 duty that a service member must have performed on or after 11 September 2001 to gain eligibility for the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

	b.  The Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program was implemented on 1 August 2009.

	c.  Eligibility to transfer unused benefits is limited to those members of the U.S. Armed Forces who were serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his educational benefits should be transferred to his dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill because he was never informed of the requirement to transfer the benefit before he retired from military service.

2.  Records show the applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired) effective 1 December 2004.

3.  The law provides that a service member must have been serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 in order to be eligible to transfer unused benefits to eligible family members.

4.  The applicant was not serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.  Therefore, he is not eligible for the 
Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability option.

5.  Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011197



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011197



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019129

    Original file (20110019129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, but she was not eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children because the law requires the Soldier to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010055

    Original file (20120010055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. An official at the Army Education Services office informed him he could not transfer his educational benefits because he was retired and no longer eligible for the option. d. The advisory official states the applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program to his dependents because public law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the U.S. Armed Forces who were serving on active duty or as a member of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021069

    Original file (20110021069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer to either his spouse or his children because the law requires the Soldier to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006679

    Original file (20130006679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she transferred her Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) educational benefits to her dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from active duty. The applicant contends her MGIB educational benefits should be transferred to her dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill because she was never briefed on the option to transfer her MGIB benefits before retiring...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019598

    Original file (20140019598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After applying for retirement after 20 years of active service in early 2009, he received an approved retirement date of 1 September 2009, during which time the Post-9/11 GI Bill was being launched. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140020958

    Original file (AR20140020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show her request to transfer her education benefits to her eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. The applicant provides: * Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, Director of Military Personnel Management (DMPM), denial of applicant's request for a TEB exception to policy * information paper * emails * website screen printout of her TEB request * excerpts...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005370

    Original file (20130005370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005799

    Original file (20130005799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 30 September 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004799

    Original file (20140004799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer his education benefits under the TEB on 29 October 2009, which is within 90 days of the implementation of the program. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he transferred the remaining balance of his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program to his youngest son. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021656

    Original file (20110021656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his educational benefits to eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result, the Board...