Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006679
Original file (20130006679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  5 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130006679 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her records to show she transferred her Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) educational benefits to her dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from active duty.

2.  The applicant states she is a 21-year, Iraqi War veteran.  She transitioned out of the Army in 2005; however, she was not advised of nor afforded the opportunity to transfer her MGIB benefits.  In July 2012, when her daughter was making plans for college, the applicant visited the MacDill Air Force Base Education Center to transfer her benefits.  She was informed she had to do this prior to retirement and that the program was not well known during the 2005 timeframe.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a pre-retirement briefing.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was appointed as a commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant and entered active duty on 3 September 1984.  She continued to serve on active duty in the Regular Army (RA) and attained the rank of lieutenant colonel/pay grade O-5.

3. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows she honorably retired from the RA on 30 September 2005 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired).

4. In support of her application the applicant provides a copy of a Fort Leonard Wood, Pre-Retirement Briefing, dated 19 October 2004.  A review of the slides fails to show any information pertaining to the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

5.  Public Law 110-252 (Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008) provides the authority for members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 to transfer unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  This public law amended Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 1606, section 16132a, to show that subject to regulation prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary concerned may permit a member who is entitled to basic educational assistance under this chapter to elect to transfer entitlement to unused educational benefits to one or more of the specified family members.

	a.  The law identified the qualifying Title 10 and Title 32 duty that a service member must have performed on or after 11 September 2001 to gain eligibility for the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

	b.  The Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program was implemented on 1 August 2009.

	c.  Eligibility to transfer unused benefits is limited to those members of the U.S. Armed Forces who were serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends her MGIB educational benefits should be transferred to her dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill because she was never briefed on the option to transfer her MGIB benefits before retiring from active duty.
2.  Records show the applicant placed on the Retired List on 1 October 2005.

3.  The law provides that a service member must have been serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 in order to be eligible to transfer unused benefits to eligible family members.

4.  The applicant was not serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.  Therefore, she is not eligible for the 
Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability option.

5.  Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006679



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006679



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001405

    Original file (20130001405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant was not serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008643

    Original file (20120008643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request because the applicant was not a member of the service on or after 1 August 2009. The applicant in this case had more than sufficient years of service upon his retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer the benefit because the law requires Soldiers to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017813

    Original file (20140017813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001374

    Original file (20120001374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his son prior to retirement under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide AD participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying AD service individual pre-separation or release from AD counseling on the benefits under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015713

    Original file (20110015713.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She would have been eligible to transfer the benefits before she retired. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018043

    Original file (20110018043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The advisory official notes the applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program to his stepdaughter. d. The advisory official states the Transfer of Education Benefit (TEB) online database shows the applicant had eligible dependents enrolled in DEERS. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve of the U.S. Army on or after 1 August 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006399

    Original file (20120006399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 22 years of service upon her transfer to the Retired Reserve, so she was eligible to transfer to either spouse or children (if she completed the request before leaving military service). c. a Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible family members. Those who retired on or after 1 August 2009, by law, were eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits providing he or she requested to transfer TEB prior to the day of retirement or transfer to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013168

    Original file (20130013168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. The law requires a member to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010055

    Original file (20120010055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. An official at the Army Education Services office informed him he could not transfer his educational benefits because he was retired and no longer eligible for the option. d. The advisory official states the applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program to his dependents because public law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the U.S. Armed Forces who were serving on active duty or as a member of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008006

    Original file (20120008006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 8 years of service upon her separation from the Selected Reserves so her children were not eligible to receive the benefits; furthermore, she was not eligible to transfer benefits to her children because the law requires Soldiers to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members. If the applicant had been in the Selected Reserve or on active duty on 1 August 2009, she would have incurred an...