IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 30 July 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140020880
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his record to show he held the rank of specialist four (SP4/E-4) on the date of his discharge and that his characterization of service was honorable.
2. The applicant states:
a. he held the rank and grade of SP4/E-4 at the time of his discharge; and
b. he received an honorable discharge (HD) not a hardship discharge.
3. The applicant provides:
* Letter of Support
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 20 January 1966 in the rank of private (PVT/E-1). He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76A (Supply Clerk).
3. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) that he was promoted to the rank of private (PV2/E-2) on 20 May 1966, to PFC/E-3 on 26 August 1966, and it includes no other entries. His military record does not contain any other documents or orders showing he was recommended for or promoted to the rank and grade of
SP4/E-4.
4. On 4 January 1967, the applicant requested a discharge from the Army based on the financial hardships he endured at that time.
5. His record includes a DA Form 2476 (Application for Separation Hardship or Dependency) that lists his rank as PFC/E-3 and shows he authenticated this document with his signature on 6 January 1967. His record also includes letters dated between 18 November and 31 December 1966 from his mother, wife, and parents in-law who each supported his request for a hardship discharge and identified his rank as ?PFC.?
6. On 6 February 1967, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicants request for a hardship/dependency[USA1] discharge. On 16 February 1967, Headquarters, United States Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, Kentucky, published Special Orders Number 39, directing the applicants release from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of PFC on 21 February 1967.
7. Accordingly, on 21 February 1967, the applicant was honorably REFRAD under the provisions of Section II, Chapter 6, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of hardship. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed a total of 1 year, 1 month, and 2 days of creditable active military service, he held the rank and pay grade of PFC/E-3 at that time, and item 13a (Character of Service) shows his service was characterized as honorable.
8. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that were prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or
release from active military service or control of the Army. It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The regulation in effect at the time of the applicants discharge states that the grade held by the individual at the time of separation will be entered on the separation document.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contention that his rank should be changed from PFC to SP4 because he held the rank of SP4 at the time of his discharge was carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. The evidence of record as indicated by the entries contained in item 33 of the applicants DA Form 20 and as listed on his REFRAD order confirms he held the rank of PFC/E-3 at the time of his discharge. As a result, absent any documentary evidence confirming he held the rank of SP4 at the time of his REFRAD, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting this portion of the requested relief.
3. Finally, as it relates to the applicants request for correction of his record to show he received an HD and not a hardship discharge. The evidence of record confirms he initiated a request for a hardship discharge on 4 January 1967, it was approved on 6 February 1967, and as a result he was REFRAD by reason of hardship on 21 February 1967. While hardship identifies the reason for his discharge, it does not classify the characterization of his service. Item 13a of his DD Form 214 confirms his service was characterized as honorable.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ___x____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
[USA1]
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140020880
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140020880
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012591
The applicants military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS), in pay grade E-1, on 28 October 1965. There is no evidence in his records to show he was again promoted to CPL, pay grade E-4, prior to his REFRAD. He was discharged from the USAR, in the rank of PFC, pay grade E-3, on 27 October 1971.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008018
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows, in Item 33 (Promotions and Reductions) that he was promoted to PFC on 13 September 1966, and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence submitted by the applicant that shows he was promoted to SP4 by proper authority while serving on active duty, there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022451
The applicant may submit a request in writing to: Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command Cold War Recognition Program ATTN: AHRC-CWRS 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue Fort Knox, KY 40122 Therefore, this portion of the applicant's request will not be discussed further in these Proceedings. Further, the record confirms he completed over 1 year of qualifying honorable active federal service and he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003224
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicants record shows that he was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 11 June 1966. The governing regulation in effect at the time of the applicants REFRAD provided no provisions for an entry of Honorable Conditions in item 13a of the DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069887C070402
The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show the highest rank he held and all awards to which he is entitled. The DD Form 214, issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, confirms that on the date of his separation he held the rank and pay grade of PVT/E-2. The evidence of record confirms that the highest rank the applicant attained during his active duty tenure was SP4/E-4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010275
The applicant states, in effect, that he is providing a certified copy of a BSM certificate that confirms he received this award while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), and is requesting to be awarded the CIB based on his qualifying infantry combat service in the RVN. The applicant's record contains Headquarters, United States Army Personnel Center, Oakland, California, Special Orders Number 338, dated 3 December 1968, which directed his relief from active duty (REFRAD) and transfer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010093
There are no orders in the available records showing he was promoted to SP5/E-5. There is no evidence and he provided no evidence showing he was promoted to SP5 by proper authority prior to his REFRAD on 13 January 1968. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base the requested relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001834
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of the specific time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements, and are reflected as: a. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006375
There is no evidence in the applicant's record that he was recommended for or promoted to SP4/E-4. The applicant has not provided any evidence to show he was promoted to SP4/E-4. XXX _______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.