Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010093
Original file (20140010093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	 19 February 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010093 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 ((Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank/grade as specialist five (SP5)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states:

* he passed his E-5 promotion board, but he was never promoted
* he was getting close to his return date from Vietnam and he wasn't going to extend/reenlist in country
* he was told that this was the condition to receive his promotion

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 23 February 1966 and he trained as an airframe repairman.  He arrived in Vietnam on 12 January 1967.

3.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he attained the temporary rank of SP4 on 13 April 1967.

4.  He departed Vietnam on 11 January 1968 and he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 13 January 1968.  His discharge orders show his rank as SP4.

5.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – "SP4(T) [Temporary] SEE 30"
* item 5b (Pay Grade) – E-4
* item 30 (Remarks) – "ITEM 5A DATE OF APT [Appointment] PFC [Private First Class] E-3 (P) [Permanent] 3 NOV 66 [3 November 1966]"

6.  There are no orders in the available records showing he was promoted to SP5/E-5.

7.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, stated for enlisted personnel to grades E-3 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in routine orders.  Field grade commanders in the rank of lieutenant colonel or higher could promote to E-5.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows he held the temporary rank of SP4/E-4 at the time he was separated on 13 January 1968.

2.  There is no evidence and he provided no evidence showing he was promoted to SP5 by proper authority prior to his REFRAD on 13 January 1968.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base the requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010093



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010093



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004703

    Original file (20110004703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 October 1968, while in Vietnam, Special Orders Number 277, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, appointing him to the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 (Permanent (P)). On 29 October 1969, Special Orders Number 302, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, ordered his release from active duty effective 29 October 1969. Army Regulation 600-200 also states the temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel in grade in which computed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002778

    Original file (20120002778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Korea and that he was separated in grade E-5. However, his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Korea or that he was separated in the grade of E-5. Records show the applicant served in Korea for 1 year and 1 month, from 7 April 1967 through 6 May 1968, and that this service is recorded in item 22, block c of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028198

    Original file (20100028198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to: * award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001545

    Original file (20080001545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows that, prior to his discharge from active duty, the applicant was appointed/promoted to the temporary rank/grade of SP5/E-5, effective 16 July 1969. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, which fell under the USARPAC Theater of Operations, for a period of 7 months and 18 days, which is correctly shown on his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000285

    Original file (20150000285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders indicate this promotion was temporary; however, his DA Form 20 shows this promotion was made permanent on 23 September 1969, under the authority of Army Regulation 600-200, paragraph 7-22a. An individual could not be promoted to SGT or staff sergeant if the promotion would cause a surplus of by-grade authorized NCO personnel in the unit to which the individual was assigned. There are no orders promoting him to the rank of SGT in his records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007877

    Original file (20110007877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 prior to his release from active duty. On 15 July 1968, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, published SO Number 197 showing he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) effective 15 July 1968. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001834

    Original file (20110001834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of the specific time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements, and are reflected as: a. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018474

    Original file (20140018474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. In order to be eligible for temporary appointment to pay grade E-4, a Soldier must have completed 6 months in pay grade E-3, be in an appointable status, and hold and be serving in the MOS in which the appointments are authorized. The permanent appointment of Regular Army Soldiers in the grade in which serving would become automatic for pay grade E-4 at 12 months? It stated that items 5a and 5b would show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation, taken...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017258

    Original file (20130017258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was placed on the promotion list before his separation. On 4 August 1971, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, published Special Orders Number 216 releasing him from active duty effective 4 August 1971. Absent the publication of the promotion instrument - a promotion order - there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief in this case.