Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017889
Original file (20140017889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017889 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states he was not aware that he had to apply within 1 year of being discharged.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on XX May 1955.

3.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 September 1975.

4.  His records contain pages 3 and 4 of his DA Form 3286 (Statements for Reenlistment), dated 27 June 1980, that show he indicated in Part IV (Dependency Statement) that he had a wife who was age 23 and a son who was age 6 at the time.

5.  His DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record – Part I), dated 24 January 1995, shows he was divorced and had two dependents.

6.  His DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 14 July 1995, shows:

* he indicated he was single
* he had two dependent daughters born in 1987 and 1988
* he elected not to participate in SBP
* his form was signed and dated by a witness

7.  On 30 September 1995, the applicant retired.

8.  His records are void of and he failed to provide any evidence showing he remarried or acquired dependents since his retirement or that he notified the Defense Finance and Accounting Service within 1 year of acquiring a wife or dependents.

9.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5), provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

11. The term "dependent child" means a person who is unmarried; is under 18 years of age or at least 18 but under 22 years of age and pursuing a full-time course of study in a high school, college, or comparable recognized educational institution; is incapable of self support because of a mental or physical incapacity existing before the person's 18th birthday, or is the child of a person to whom the SBP applies, including an adopted child, a step or foster child, or a recognized natural child who lived with that person in a regular parent-child relationship.

12.  Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an open enrollment season from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006.  It required enrollees to live 2 years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  The retiree must have paid monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium covering all the costs that would have been paid if the election had been made at the first opportunity to do so.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes and other Army publications.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show the applicant was not married and he had two dependent children at the time he completed his DD Form 2656.

2.  Although he was unmarried, he could have elected children-only SBP coverage for his dependent daughters.  Instead he chose not to participate in SBP.

3.  His records are void of and he failed to provide any evidence showing he remarried.  Even had he done so he would not be entitled to enroll because he earlier opted not to participate.  His only chance to enroll is during an open season.

4.  His records are also void of and he failed to provide any evidence indicating he attempted to participate in the 2005-2006 open enrollment season.  It is unknown when the next open enrollment season may be.

5.  In view of the above evidence, there is an insufficient basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x ____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017889



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017889



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006581

    Original file (20120006581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Divorce decree, dated 30 May 1985 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60, dated 27 October 1994 * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 30 January 1995 * Certificate of marriage registration, dated 19 March 2002 * Certificate of live birth, dated 18 June 2002 * Certificate of live birth, dated 22 November 2004 * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 20 July 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 95-397, enacted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011839

    Original file (20100011839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within one year of his marriage. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 March 1993, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001369

    Original file (20090001369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her previous request that the records of her husband, the former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant appealed to the ABCMR in an application dated 1 August 2007 requesting that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he elected to change his SBP coverage from "Natural...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001439

    Original file (20120001439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. Records show that during the applicant's retirement processing in 1995 he completed an application for retired pay. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of their marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007406

    Original file (20140007406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) at the time he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show he elected RCSBP coverage for his spouse within a year of their marriage. In 2003, when he married, he had a 1-year period in which to submit an RCSBP election to provide coverage for his spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007783

    Original file (20130007783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he submitted a DD Form 2656-6 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Change Certificate) in a timely manner naming his current spouse "BSF" as his eligible beneficiary. The law allows him to terminate his natural person with insurable interest SBP coverage at any time. However, his record is void and he failed to provide evidence showing he submitted a request to DFAS to terminate his insurable interest SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006453

    Original file (20070006453.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that upon retirement from the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG), he was unmarried and thus elected the children only coverage of the Reserve Component SBP. This application was dated 2 March 2007 by the applicant and received by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 27 April 2007. On 20 December 2005, HRC emailed DFAS (responding to HRC's email dated 14 November 2005) and asked "If the FSM elects to cover spouse during the open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008688

    Original file (20090008688.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Retiree Account Statement shows that he is paying SBP coverage for children only. However, evidence of record shows that the applicant was married in October 2000 and did attempt to change his SBP coverage in January 2003, prior to the establishment of the Open Season held from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he requested children and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023506

    Original file (20110023506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election that shows the applicant married Pamela R. R----, on 6 October 2007; that he had no dependent children; and he elected to participate in the SBP with spouse only coverage, based on full gross retired pay, with the full enrollment premium amount deducted from his retired pay in 24 monthly installments. The applicant married on 6 October 2007; however, there is no evidence that he elected RCSBP spouse coverage within 1 year of the marriage date. The...