Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011839
Original file (20100011839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011839 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within one year of his marriage.

2.  The applicant states he was unmarried and did not have any eligible dependents at the time of his retirement.  He contends that he was unaware of the requirement to enroll in the SBP within 1 year of marriage.  He further states that the Army Reserve did not brief him about this requirement.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his marriage certificate, spouse's birth certificate, social security card, military dependent identification card, and SBP query from the Retiree Pay System.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO sent the applicant a letter, dated 31 December 1986, notifying him of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60.  This letter informed him that he was eligible to participate in the RCSBP.  He was also informed that he had a 90-day suspense to make his election.  Failing to do so would result in his remaining uncovered until he became 60 years of age and applied for retired pay.

3.  The applicant was transferred to the Reserved Reserve on 1 March 1993.

4.  The applicant attained 60 years of age on 20 November 2001.  DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Pay), dated 25 May 2000, indicates that the applicant declined to participate in the SBP and he had no eligible dependents.

5.  The applicant provided a marriage certificate showing that he had married on 23 February 2005.

6.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

7.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

9.  All issues of Army Echoes going back at least the January - March 1998 issue carry the reminder: “REMEMBER:  You (emphasis in the original) are responsible for updating your retired pay file information at DFAS-CL within one year of the event if you marry, remarry, have a child, are widowed, or divorced and need to make or update a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election.”

10.  The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2005 established an SBP Open Enrollment period to be conducted 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes, the authorized Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.  The retiree must have paid monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium covering all the costs that would have been paid for the election if it had been made at the first opportunity to do so.

	a.  Army Echoes, Issue 1, January - April 2005, first alerted retirees that an SBP Open Enrollment period would run from 1 October 2005 - 30 September 2006.

	b.  Army Echoes, Issue 3, September - December 2005, also alerted retirees that the retiree who enrolls in the SBP during the Open Enrollment period must pay monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a one-time buy-in enrollment premium.  It provided an internet reference that would aid retirees in calculating their cost.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be permitted to enroll in the SBP because he was not informed he had only 1 year after marriage to enroll.  

2.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 March 1993, he applied for retired pay on 24 May 2000, he attained age 60 on 20 November 2001, and he married on 23 February 2005.  Had he exercised reasonable diligence in the conduct of his personal affairs, he would have read Army Echoes which has, since 1998, continually reminded Army retirees of the 1-year requirement for SBP enrollment after marriage.  In 2005, this same publication further informed Army retirees of the open enrollment season from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006, which in effect extended the applicant's enrollment window by over 7 months beyond his 1-year anniversary.

3.  The applicant has the option of enrolling in the SBP if/when Congress declares another open season.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011839



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011839



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003898

    Original file (20090003898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a DD Form 2656-3, dated 23 November 1999, which shows an election of spouse and child beneficiary category based on the full amount of retired pay with immediate coverage. Each statement showed the current SBP coverage elected by the retiree or the fact that no SBP election is reflected. As such, the election for spouse and child only made at the time of his retired pay application would not have been valid.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011249

    Original file (20110011249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record also shows he was placed on the Retired List in his retired rank of MAJ on 28 December 2010, his 60th birthday. The evidence of record shows upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed a DD Form 1883 on 21 July 1992, electing "children only" coverage under option C (immediate coverage). In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 9 September 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012014

    Original file (20110012014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed a DD Form 1883 on 2 November 1990, electing "children only" coverage under option C (immediate coverage). He married 3 years later on 19 March 1993. In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 19 March 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002025

    Original file (20090002025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that at the time he made his SBP election, he was unmarried and elected the child only option for his daughter who was a college student at the time. Army Echoes, Issue 1, January - April 2005 first alerted retirees that an SBP Open Enrollment period would run from 1 October 2005 - 30 September 2006. However, the applicant has not provided and his records do not contain any evidence to show that the applicant notified either the Army or the DFAS within 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013913

    Original file (20100013913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013913 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with his application, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-6 and indicated he was married to the applicant and elected "spouse only" SBP coverage based on the full gross pay without supplemental SBP. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 20 July 1989, electing "children only" coverage under option B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025987

    Original file (20100025987.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * their 5 May 2002 marriage certificate * their son's 17 April 2008 birth certificate * the FSM's 25 May 2010 death certificate * the FSM's 1 November 2003 National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * orders transferring the FSM to the Retired Reserve, effective 1 November 2003 * a letter from the RIARNG Transition Assistance Advisor stating they have no record that the FSM ever received or was offered a briefing on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001369

    Original file (20090001369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her previous request that the records of her husband, the former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant appealed to the ABCMR in an application dated 1 August 2007 requesting that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he elected to change his SBP coverage from "Natural...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004937

    Original file (20080004937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 7 June 2006, shows that a premium for RCSBP coverage for child(ren) only had been deducted from his retired pay. He completed the DD Form 1883 by electing dependent child only coverage, Option C. 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004269

    Original file (20130004269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 19 February 2013 * a State of Colorado Marriage License and Marriage Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence and also in the Army Times. He was authorized up to 1 year from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse and stepchildren in the RCSBP.