Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015324
Original file (20140015324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	   25 June 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015324 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous application to the Board for correction of his record to consider him for promotion to the rank of major (MAJ).

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

* he is presently serving in a position that is one rank higher than he presently holds
* his record was corrected to show he was granted Federal recognition as a captain (CPT) with a date of rank (DOR) of 27 August 2010
* he should have been considered for promotion to MAJ on the September 2013 and March 2014 Position Vacancy Promotion Boards 

3.  The applicant provides:

* a self-authored statement
* U.S. Army Special Forces Command (USASFC) Table of Distribution and Allowance
* 2 memoranda
* an extract from an Army regulation
* DD Form 2088 (Statement of Ecclesiastical Endorsement)
* Orders C-08-312205
* Orders A-09-312695
* an email
* DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report)
* a letter
* Orders M-06-400117

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20140008410 on 12 August 2014.

2.  The applicant provides memorandums of support, orders, and an extract which were not previously reviewed by the Board.  Therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board.
 
3.  On 27 August 2010, following prior enlisted service in the United States Navy, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank of first lieutenant (1LT).

4.  Orders 259-1057, issued by the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) on 16 September 2010, appointed him in the INARNG and granted him temporary Federal recognition effective 27 August 2010.

5.  Special Orders Number 17 AR, issued by the NGB on 28 January 2011, extended him Federal recognition for his initial appointment to 1LT, effective 27 August 2010 with a DOR of 27 August 2008.

6.  Orders 030-1134, issued by the INARNG on 30 January 2012, announced his promotion to CPT effective 20 January 2012.  

7.  Special Orders Number 172 AR, issued by the NGB on 11 May 2012, extended him Federal recognition for his promotion to CPT effective 26 April 2012.

8.  Orders 203-1023, issued by the INARNG on 22 July 2013, released him from the INARNG and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) effective 22 July 2013.

9.  Orders C-08-3122005, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 27 August 2013, reassigned the applicant to the U.S. Army Special Forces Command, Fort Bragg, NC, effective on 26 August 2013.  He was assigned as the Chaplain position on the unit manning document serving in the position of MAJ/pay grade O-4.

10.  Special Orders Number 326, issued by the NGB on 11 December 2013, withdrew his Federal recognition effective 22 July 2013.

11.  On 12 August 2014, the ABCMR corrected the applicant's record to show he was granted Federal recognition as a CPT, with a DOR of 27 August 2010.  Special Orders Number 319, issued by the NGB on 3 November 2014, amended his effective date extending him Federal recognition to CPT to 27 August 2010.

12.  He is currently serving on active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF).  He provides a self-authored statement in which he claims:

   a.  He should have been considered for promotion to MAJ effective 27 August 2013, which would have given him two opportunities to be selected for promotion based on either the September 2013 or March 2014 U. S. Army Reserve Position Vacancy Boards.

   b.  Based on his corrected (27 August 2010) effective date to CPT, he would have been a CPT with three years minimum time in service in the grade of CPT in August 2013.  He was mobilized in support of OEF on 8 September 2013 projected through 7 September 2015, and serves as a Chaplain in the higher grade of MAJ/pay grade O-4 on the unit manning roster.

   c.  U.S. Code 14315 and 14303 supports that a Reservist may be promoted to the next rank (in this case MAJ) with a minimum of three years time in service in the grade of CPT.  His mandatory retirement date is December 2015 and although his records went before the MAJ promotion board in March 2015, those records included evaluations as a 1LT which he feels should have shown his rank as a CPT.  He believes not being awarded the rank of CPT when he first entered service [constructive service credit for ecclesiastical training and experience] negatively impacted his ability for early promotion consideration to MAJ. 

13.  The applicant provides a copy of the USASFC Mobilization Table of Distribution and Allowance, dated October 2013 that shows he is assigned to a MAJ/O-4 position with the principle duty title of Chaplain.

14.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National and Army Reserve – Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers):

   a.  Prescribes Reserve Component (RC) policies and procedures for promotion of officers, including position vacancy promotions.  It states promotion to fill authorized troop program unit position vacancies may be filled through promotion of the best qualified, geographically available officers.
   b.  Special selection boards, convened under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act on and after 1 October 1996, will reconsider commissioned officers, (other than commissioned warrant officers) who were wrongly not considered and reconsider commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) who were considered but not selected by mandatory promotion boards that convened on or after 1 October 1996.  These boards do not reconsider officers who were not considered or not selected by mandatory promotion boards that convened before 1 October 1996.

   c.  Records of officers or former officers will be referred for special selection board action when the Office of Promotions (RC) determines the following:
   
(1)  An officer was eligible for promotion consideration; however, the officer's 
records were, through error, not submitted to a mandatory promotion selection board.

   (2)  A review of a mandatory selection board finds that an officer's records contained a material error.

   (3)  The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) requests such a referral. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully examined and considered.

2.  As a result of the applicant's incorrect initial appointment, unfortunately, it appears he may have been disadvantaged for promotion to MAJ.  His initial appointment rank was corrected by this Board to show he was granted Federal recognition as a CPT, with a DOR of 27 August 2010.  

3.  However, while he has provided sufficient evidence to support his contention that he was eligible for promotion consideration based on the original miscalculation of his entry rank, a position vacancy board is a commander initiated action to fill vacant positions and not a mandatory selection board.  

4.  Records of officers or former officers will be referred for special selection board action when it is determined an officer was eligible for promotion consideration by a mandatory promotion selection board.  There is no provision in the regulation which allows the applicant to be referred to a special selection board based on his exclusion from a previously held position vacancy board. 


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20140008410, dated 12 August 2014.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015324



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015324



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008410

    Original file (20140008410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Personnel Management Officer (PMO) recommended approval of the applicant's request, stating: * he is not sure why the Army recruiter told the applicant it would be easier to get him in as a 1LT * it is not a question of ease, it is a question of law and legality * the applicant's initial appointment should have been as a CPT Chaplain in accordance with Army Regulation 135-100 (ARNG and USAR Appointment of Commission and Warrant Officers of the Army), Table 3-1 * the applicant's DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021087

    Original file (20130021087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her DOR for CPT and MAJ should reflect the date the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) state promotion orders were effective and not the later date the Federal recognition orders were issued because officer promotions are a state function. (1) Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers), paragraph 4-21b(2) states, "Unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028247

    Original file (20100028247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. He was selected for State promotion in the Army National Guard (ARNG) with follow-on Federal recognition (FEDREC) orders, effective 27 May 2010. d. He states that DA promotion policy for officers selected for promotion who are mobilized provides for automatic eligibility for promotion by the date of the mobilization order. The State promoted the applicant to MAJ on 27 May 2010 while he was deployed. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021115

    Original file (20100021115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021115 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He was transferred from the USAR to the North Carolina ARNG (NCARNG) in the rank of CPT and executed an oath of office on 28 June 2007. This memorandum states that ARNG officers recommended for promotion to the grades of CPT through lieutenant colonel mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code , and who are on an approved mandatory selection board promotion list who reach their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018430

    Original file (20130018430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence which shows he was unjustly blocked from occupying the CPT/O-3 70B slot. In order for the applicant to have been promoted to CPT prior to 6 February 2013, he must have met all of the requirements for a Medical Service Corps officer in AOC 70B. Since there was not a valid vacancy for him to be promoted into and he was not fully qualified in AOC 70B until 1 February 2013, he was not eligible to be promoted prior to 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004501

    Original file (20120004501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The J1 noted that both officers had been selected for promotion by the State Federal Recognition Board and the error in not processing their promotions to the NGB in a timely manner lay solely with the G1 section, not the officers. In view of the foregoing, especially considering the NGB advisory opinion's recommendation, it would be appropriate at this time to correct the applicant's records to show his State promotion packet was submitted in a timely manner and the applicant was extended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000019

    Original file (20140000019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DOR to CPT should be adjusted to 24 September 2009 as that was the date he was hired to be an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) [in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG)] in the position as battalion training officer, a CPT position. Army Regulation 135-155, table 2-1, states the minimum time in grade for promotion to CPT is 2 years (unit vacancy promotion) and the maximum is 5 years (mandatory promotion). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to 1LT in the ARNG on 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010152

    Original file (20140010152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 August 2004, the CAARNG published State Orders 233-1101 appointing him in the ARNG in the rank of CPT as an SP officer, effective 18 August 2004. Discussion: [Applicant] believes he should have received a promotion date effective 2 February 2009 because of the 4-year delay in correcting and processing his DA Form 5074-1-R for creditable service in a required grade. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002710

    Original file (20140002710.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (3) on 17 July 2007, the applicant was recommended for promotion by the Commander of the PAARNG. The Reserve Officer Promotion Act states, "The effective date of promotion and date of rank of an officer promoted under the vacancy system is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal recognition. The applicant contends his DOR for promotion to CPT should be adjusted from 29 November 2007 to 17 August 2006, when he first became eligible for promotion to CPT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017050

    Original file (20120017050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's contention that his effective date of promotion to MAJ should be adjusted to 13 April 2005 and therefore, upon correction, his DOR to LTC should be changed to 12 April 2012 was carefully considered and found to have merit; however, there are some errors the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) may not correct. With respect to his DOR to LTC, Army Regulation 135-155, the governing Army regulation, states the DOR (upon promotion) will be the date the officer...