Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000019
Original file (20140000019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  25 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000019 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT)/O-3 be adjusted to 24 September 2009 vice 29 September 2010.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  His DOR to CPT should be adjusted to 24 September 2009 as that was the date he was hired to be an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) [in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG)] in the position as battalion training officer, a CPT position.  He was a senior first lieutenant (1LT) at the time with nearly 26 months time in grade (TIG) and he assumed he would be promoted to CPT because he was in the position.

	b.  When he asked the battalion commander, Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) JW, if he would be promoted, he was told no.  LTC JW stated the reasons were that he (LTC JW) had been a 1LT for 7 years, he (the applicant) had just been hired as an AGR and was going to be making plenty of money, and his plan was to keep him as a 1LT until he was boarded (presumably referring to the Department of the Army (DA) board).  He further stated that after he was selected for promotion by the DA board, he was going to wait until the last minute to promote him.  He was going to do the same thing once he was eligible for promotion to major (MAJ).  This would allow the battalion to keep him for up to 15 years to maintain continuity in the AGR program and it was his discretion as commander to do so. 

	c.  The most frustrating and insulting part was that LTC JW wrote and signed his Officer Evaluation Report (OER) that stated "he was ready for increased responsibility and duties," that he possessed unlimited potential for promotion, and he "must be promoted."  After he wrote the OER, LTC JW stated he was not going to promote him.  He was perplexed with the logic as he was given an outstanding OER, was hired for a CPT position, and was never negatively counseled.  He only recently found out that it was an option to file an application with the ABCMR.

3.  The applicant provides two orders, five DA Forms 67-9 (OER), a memorandum, and three pages of email.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving as a Reserve officer in the ALARNG and he held the primary specialty 11A (Infantry).  He attended and successfully completed the Infantry Officer Basic Course from 21 August to 14 December 2005.  On 15 August 2007, he was promoted to the rank/grade of 1LT/O-2.

3.  On 24 September 2009, he entered active duty in an AGR status.  He was assigned to the ALARNG, 1st Battalion, 167th Infantry Regiment, Talladega, AL. 

4.  Orders 169-518, dated 18 June 2010, issued by the ALARNG, promoted him to CPT effective 17 June 2010.  These orders stated he would not be paid at the promoted rank until Federal Recognition was confirmed.

5.  Special Orders Number 220 AR, dated 4 October 2010, issued by the National Guard Bureau (NGB), extended him Federal recognition for the purpose of promotion to CPT with a DOR and effective date of 29 September 2010.

6.  On 31 December 2013, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB.  The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request for an adjusted DOR to CPT of 24 September 2009.  The advisory official stated:

	a.  The applicant entered active duty as an AGR on 24 September 2009, in duty position S-3 Air, which was an O-3 position.  The ALARNG promoted him to CPT on 17 June 2010 and he was extended Federal Recognition on 29 September 2010.  The applicant was not DA board selected for promotion to CPT.  He would have been in the zone of consideration for the Fiscal Year 2011 (FY 11) DA board because his DOR to 1LT was 15 August 2007.  He was promoted by unit vacancy prior to the FY 11 DA board. 

	b.  The ALARNG did not violate any regulations in administering the applicant's promotion.  Although eligible for promotion earlier, his chain of command was within its discretion to process the promotion in the manner it did.  He was promoted within the requirements of Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers an Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) and National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers-Federal Recognition and Related Actions).

	c.  The applicant was a 1LT for 3 years and 1 month.  This TIG did not approach the maximum TIG of 5 years as a 1LT as determined by Army Regulation 135-155, Table 2-1.

	d.  The ALARNG concurs with this recommendation.

7.  On 2 January 2014, the applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14308(f) states the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve officer of the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG shall be the date on which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended.

9.  Army Regulation 135-155, table 2-1, states the minimum time in grade for promotion to CPT is 2 years (unit vacancy promotion) and the maximum is 5 years (mandatory promotion).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to 1LT in the ARNG on 15 August 2007.  As he met the education requirements, he met the minimum TIG and was eligible for a unit vacancy promotion to CPT on 15 August 2009.  He entered active duty as an AGR on 24 September 2009, his unit promoted him on 17 June 2010, and he was extended Federal Recognition in the rank of CPT on 29 September 2010.  He met the maximum TIG requirements for promotion to CPT on 15 August 2012.  

2.  The eligibility for promotion does not mean automatic promotion to the next highest grade.  National Guard promotions are a function of the State and the fact that he was promoted by his ARNG unit to CPT and granted Federal Recognition on 29 September 2009 does not constitute an error on the part of his unit.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000019





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000019



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004162

    Original file (20110004162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings Docket Number AR20090007322, dated 5 January 2010 * his promotion orders to MAJ * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal recognition orders * two memoranda from the Virgin Islands National Guard (VING) Joint Force Headquarters * an NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) * his OER's * a memorandum of promotion to LTC by an SSB, dated 2 July 2009 * an NGB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019825

    Original file (20100019825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He contends that as an ARNG AGR officer, he was authorized DORs determined as follows in accordance with (IAW) paragraphs 4-15 and 4-19d of Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), effective 1 October 1994 for his promotion to MAJ and 1 February 1998 for his promotion to LTC as follows: a. Paragraph 4-15 provides that the Promotion Eligibility Date (PED) is the date the officer meets the eligibility criteria for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014403

    Original file (20100014403.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Because his DOR to MAJ was not annotated on the order announcing Federal recognition, he did not appear before the LTC selection board until 2005 and he was selected for promotion with an effective date of 18 January 2006. c. Because of the error in his DOR for MAJ, his DOR for LTC is also incorrect and should be 30 June 2004. The official noted that his DOR to MAJ was corrected by NGB Special Orders Number 177 AR (Extract) to reflect his maximum time in grade (TIG) as a CPT as required by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001273

    Original file (20120001273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the required completion of 5 years TIG, his promotion eligibility for CPT by a mandatory promotion board is 13 March 2013. The regulation states ARNG officers will be considered for promotion by mandatory promotion boards, and promotion to CPT required completion of 5 years of maximum TIG as a first lieutenant. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed in the MDARNG as a 1LT effective 13 March 2009 with an adjusted DOR of 13 March 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021008

    Original file (20120021008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he could not submit his promotion packet for CPT until the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) had finalized his DOR to first lieutenant (1LT). Without question, the failure to timely process the applicant's earlier correction for Federal recognition resulted in a delay in the processing of his appointment as a CPT. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013779

    Original file (20110013779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 January 2006, he was issued Memorandum, Subject: Eligibility for Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer Not on Active Duty Memorandum that notified him he had been selected for promotion under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-155 to LTC by a board that adjourned on 30 September 2005. On 2 July 2012, he submitted a rebuttal wherein he stated: * The NGB omitted a fact that negates their opinion in that at the time of his selection for promotion to MAJ, he was in an AGR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002710

    Original file (20140002710.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (3) on 17 July 2007, the applicant was recommended for promotion by the Commander of the PAARNG. The Reserve Officer Promotion Act states, "The effective date of promotion and date of rank of an officer promoted under the vacancy system is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal recognition. The applicant contends his DOR for promotion to CPT should be adjusted from 29 November 2007 to 17 August 2006, when he first became eligible for promotion to CPT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012189

    Original file (20130012189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) Orders 077-221, dated 18 March 2009 * GAARNG assignment orders, dated 11 September 2009 * State promotion orders, dated 17 June 2010 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal recognition Special Orders Number 142 AR, dated 2 July 2010 * NGB memorandum for The Adjutants General, dated 30 January 2004, subject: Promotion of Mobilized ARNG Officers Who are Selected for Promotion by a DA Mandatory Promotion Board * 22 pages of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011249

    Original file (20070011249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. Undated Memorandum, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center [now known as Army Human Resources Command (AHRC)], St Louis, Missouri (MO), Appointment as a USAR Officer; b. DA Form 71 (Oath of Office), dated 17 January 1988, as a 1LT in the USAR; c. Oath of Office, dated 18 July 1988, California Army National Guard (CAARNG); d. DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 14 April 1989, Completion of the CH Officer Basic Course; e. DA Form 67-8 (U.S....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013547

    Original file (20140013547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain an NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States), dated 27 February 2010, which shows she requested Federal recognition and appointment in the ARNG as a 1LT Judge Advocate (JA). (5) On 5 May 2014, the applicant received a corrected date for Federal recognition to 1LT effective 1 October 2010. c. The...