Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015153
Original file (20140015153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  30 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015153 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the issuance of a separate DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his honorable service.

2.  The applicant states he needs a DD Form 214 which shows his honorable service for the Department of Motor Vehicles and others that request a copy of his DD Form 214 for veteran's benefits.  He states the DD Form 214 he currently has only shows his "second enlistment" discharge.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for 4 years on 14 November 1989.

3.  After completing 3 years, 5 months, and 29 days of net active service this period, he was honorably discharged on 12 May 1993, for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.

4.  The applicant reenlisted in the RA for 4 years and 22 weeks on 13 May 1993.

5.  On 12 April 1994, the applicant extended his 13 May 1993 enlistment for a period of 1 year and 1 month.

6.  On 23 June 1997, the applicant was discharged as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed special court-martial conviction.  He had completed 7 years, 2 months, and 17 days of total active service.  He received a bad conduct discharge (BCD).  Item 18 (Remarks) does not indicate his first period of honorable service.

7.  The DD Form 214 the applicant received shows his service in the RA from the date of his initial enlistment on 14 November 1989 through 23 June 1997, the date of his BCD.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation stated that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of REFRAD, retirement, or discharge.  The regulation stated that for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable," enter "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which DD Form 214 was not issued) Until (date before commencement of current enlistment) in item 18.  It further states a DD Form 214 will not be  prepared for Enlisted members discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The regulation in effect at the time stated that for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable," enter "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which DD Form 214 was not issued) Until (date before commencement of current enlistment) in item 18. 
2.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 on his DD Form 214 dated 23 June 1997 to add the entry "Continuous Honorable Active Service From 19891114 Until 19930512."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to issuing the applicant a separate DD Form 214 to show his honorable service.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015153



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015153



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005578

    Original file (20130005578.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) showing he was honorably discharged after serving from 11 October 1989 to 10 October 1993. If he had received a DD Form 214 for each period of service, the first would have shown his service was honorable. A DD Form 214 will not be prepared for enlisted Soldiers discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016473

    Original file (20130016473.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12 (Date Entered AD (Active Duty) This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 11 February 1997 to show a date of 4 March 1993. The evidence of record shows the applicant again enlisted in the RA on 4 March 1993 and reenlisted on 12 October 1995. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005845

    Original file (20140005845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 4 February 1993 and he was discharged, on 24 July 1997. The evidence of record shows the applicant stated that his HOR was San Antonio, TX, and that information was recorded on his reenlistment contract. Thus, there is no evidence of error in the Place EAD or the HOR recorded on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011132

    Original file (20120011132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The board recommended the applicant be discharged from the U.S. Army with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 30 January1995, the separation authority approved the board's recommendation for discharge of the applicant and directed the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-5a, for misconduct with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The evidence of record shows that for Soldiers who have previously...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001252

    Original file (20140001252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he ever accepted NJP. The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable." As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting a complete and unconditional discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006671

    Original file (20120006671.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He requests a DD Form 214 for each enlistment period that he completed. b. Paragraph 2-1 (Preparing the DD Form 214) states a DD Form 214 will not be prepared for enlisted Soldiers discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA. The evidence of record shows that a DD Form 214 will not be prepared for enlisted Soldiers discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021255

    Original file (20140021255.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 February 1996, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge, ordered his reduction to the rank of private (E-1), and directed that his service be characterized as under other than honorable conditions. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), as corrected by two DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) both issued on 17 April 1997, show he was discharged on 28 March 1996 under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004784

    Original file (20090004784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her request to correct her military records and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 27 March 1993, to reflect her current name and gender. In support of her request, the applicant provides a self-authored letter, dated 16 March 2009; copies of her 1993, 1995, 1997, and 1999 active duty orders; her 1993 DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009196

    Original file (20080009196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, the available evidence fails to show that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214, or any other document, separating him from active duty in the RA and/or discharging him from the U.S. Army. In view of all of the foregoing, and based on the fact the applicant waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service or description of separation no less favorable than General Under Honorable Conditions, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010544

    Original file (20120010544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show the period of his honorable service on a separate DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 30 September 1985 and he was discharged on 31 October 1996 in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than...