Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001252
Original file (20140001252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  21 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001252 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a complete and unconditional discharge. 

2.  The applicant states the first 5 years of his service in the Army should be considered as good time.  Anything after his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) equals bad time.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for 3 years on 24 September 1986.  After completing 2 years, 5 months, and 11 days of net active service, he reenlisted in the RA for 4 years on 7 March 1989.

3.  The applicant's record shows he received a letter of reprimand on 8 May 1991, for having sexual intercourse with a woman not his wife.  He also had charges preferred against him on 16 July 1992, for conspiracy to possess and sell stolen property, failure to turn over to proper authority abandoned and captured property, dealing in the sale of certain abandoned and captured property, and wrongfully subscribing under lawful oath a false statement.  All charges pertained to an AK-47 rifle.  However, there is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he ever accepted NJP.

4.  On 13 January 1993, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He completed 6 years, 3 months, and 20 days of net active service this period.  His service was characterized as under other than honorable conditions.

5.  Item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) contains the statement "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 860924 TO 890306//IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD:  860924-890306//"

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The current version of the regulation instructing that Item 18 state, in pertinent part, whether a Soldier has or has not completed his first full term of service is mandatory.  It further indicates that routinely a Soldier should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs before the end of the initial contracted period of service.  However, if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract.  For enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by this DD Form 214, the entry "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD" (specify dates) will be added to Item 18.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should be granted a complete and unconditional discharge for his initial period of active duty service has been carefully considered and partial relief is warranted.  Unconditional service determinations under Public Law Number 95-126 and entitlement to veteran's benefits based on these determinations are within the purview of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and will be made by that agency.  However, entries are required on the DD Form 214 to assist the VA and State agencies in making these benefit entitlement determinations and as a result it would be appropriate to make these administrative corrections. 

2.  By regulation, an entry in Item 18 stipulating if a member has or has not completed the first full term of service is mandatory and if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of his initial contracted period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract.  The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable."  This entry will be the statement "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which DD Form 214 was not issued) until (date before commencement of current enlistment), and then the specific periods of reenlistments will be entered.

3.  Based on the regulatory guidance, the applicant's initial 3-year enlistment in the RA on 24 September 1986 would be redefined based on his 7 March 1989 reenlistment and he should have been credited with completing his first full term of service.  Therefore, the entry "SOLDIER HAS COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" should be added to Item 18 of the applicant's DD Form 214, and the immediate reenlistment entry already contained in Item 18 should be modified to read "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD "890307-930113."

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__X______  __X______  __X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 18 of his DD Form 214 as follows:

	a.  Add the entry “SOLDIER HAS COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" and

	b.  Modify the existing immediate reenlistment entry to show "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD "890307-930113."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting a complete and unconditional discharge determination.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001252



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001252



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016346

    Original file (20080016346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued at the time shows he held the rank of PV1 and had completed a total of 6 years, 6 months, and 28 days of creditable active military service. The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable." As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010950

    Original file (20080010950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records show he initially enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) and entered active duty on 2 April 1980, for a 3 year period. The governing regulation also stipulates that the immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable" will contain the entry "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072610C070403

    Original file (2002072610C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: The Army Discharge Review Board had denied his request for an upgraded discharge on 6 February 1980 (not 1988). That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was eligible for a complete and unconditional separation from the military service at the time of his honorable discharge on 28 April 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000253

    Original file (20150000253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract. Therefore, the entry "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD: 16 MARCH 2009 – 19 APRIL 2013" should be added to item 18 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074429C070403

    Original file (2002074429C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was honorably discharged on 26 June 1980 for the purpose of reenlisting on 27 June 1980 for 6 years. It directed that the following statement would be added to all DD Forms 214 without exception: “Member (has) (has not) completed first term of service.” Normally, a member should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs prior to the end of the initial contracted period of service. That all of the Department of the Army records related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021468

    Original file (20100021468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she completed her first term of service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007455

    Original file (20100007455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he reenlisted on 9 November 2009 (in a separate application, he said he reenlisted on 3 April 2009) placing him on his second term. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents which are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service and states the following: a. paragraph 2-4h(18)(b) states that the entry "SOLDIER (HAS) (HAS NOT) COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" is a mandatory entry. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059782C070421

    Original file (2001059782C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. It would not be appropriate to change the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged honorably from the reenlistment commencing on 10 November 1982.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007601

    Original file (20100007601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 18 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty) be corrected to show the entry “MEMBER COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE” instead of “MEMBER HAS NOT COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE.” 2. His DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment//Reenlistment Document), dated 12 May 2007, shows the applicant reenlisted for a period of 5 years. The regulation states that a Soldier should not be considered to have completed the first full term of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006511

    Original file (20110006511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006511 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * item 18 of his DD Form 214 states he did not complete his first term when, in fact, he was in his second enlistment when he was discharged * he reenlisted on 19 October 2009 3. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry "MEMBER HAS NOT COMPLETED FIRST FULL...