Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005578
Original file (20130005578.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  19 November 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005578 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) showing he was honorably discharged after serving from 11 October 1989 to 10 October 1993.

2.  He states he served for 8 years.  During his second enlistment, he got into some trouble, but his first 4 years of service was honorable.  If he had received a DD Form 214 for each period of service, the first would have shown his service was honorable.

3.  The applicant provides a letter he received from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 28 January 2013.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 11 October 1989, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 4 years.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 31U (Signal Support Systems Specialist).

3.  On 8 June 1983, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  On 9 June 1993, he reenlisted in the RA for a period of 3 years.

4.  On 22 August 1997, he was discharged with a bad conduct discharge pursuant to the affirmed sentence of a special court-martial.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at that time shows in:

* item 12a (Date Entered [Active Duty] This Period) – 11 October 1989
* item 12b (Separation Date This Period) – 22 August 1997
* item 18 (Remarks), in part – "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE:  19891011-19930608//IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD-- 19891011-19930608"
* item 24 (Character of Service) – "BAD CONDUCT"

5.  He provides a letter from the VA, dated 28 January 2013, informing him that they determined his service from 11 October 1989 to 20 October 1993 was under honorable conditions and that he is entitled to receive VA and health care benefits based upon this period of service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. It stated:

	a.  A DD Form 214 will not be prepared for enlisted Soldiers discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.

	b.  For enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by this DD Form 214, enter "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD: (specify dates)."  However, for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable," enter "Continuous Honorable Active Service From (first day of service where DD Form 214 was not issued) Until (date before commencement of current enlistment); then enter the specific periods of reenlistments as prescribed above.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no provision of regulation and no basis for issuing the applicant a separate DD Form 214 to show the period of his initial honorable active service prior to his reenlistment on 9 June 1993.

2.  The governing regulation in effect then and currently in effect prohibits issuing a DD Form 214 to Soldiers discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.

3.  For Soldiers who receive a discharge other than honorable, Army Regulation 635-5 provides for an entry in item 18 listing any periods of continuous honorable active service prior to the current enlistment.  His first enlistment contract was terminated when he reenlisted on 9 June 1993.  Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, his DD Form 214 appropriately includes the statement "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE:  19891011-19930608."

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005578



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005578



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016473

    Original file (20130016473.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12 (Date Entered AD (Active Duty) This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 11 February 1997 to show a date of 4 March 1993. The evidence of record shows the applicant again enlisted in the RA on 4 March 1993 and reenlisted on 12 October 1995. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002055

    Original file (20150002055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his entry date as August 1973 instead of April 1977. He completed 3 years, 8 months, and 1 day of creditable active military service during this period of initial enlistment and he was issued a Certification of Military Service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 with an entry date of 11 April 1977 and ending on 31 August 1993 correctly reflects his record of service and contains no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015153

    Original file (20140015153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the DD Form 214 he currently has only shows his "second enlistment" discharge. The DD Form 214 the applicant received shows his service in the RA from the date of his initial enlistment on 14 November 1989 through 23 June 1997, the date of his BCD. The regulation stated that for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable," enter "Continuous Honorable Active Service From"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001252

    Original file (20140001252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he ever accepted NJP. The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable." As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting a complete and unconditional discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011910

    Original file (20140011910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he: * entered active duty (AD) on 27 August 1986 vice 21 October 1986 * was honorably discharged on 1 August 1991 vice discharged on 7 January 1993 under other than honorable conditions * completed the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) 2. Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001855

    Original file (20130001855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130001855 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 8 February 1966 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, MO, Orders P-06-303705, dated 1 June 2000, retired him and placed him on the Retired List in the grade of sergeant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017105

    Original file (20080017105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty this period on 31 August 1982 and was discharged on 22 May 1989 under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14 (Misconduct), based on civilian conviction. The evidence of record also shows that the requirement to prepare the DD Form 214 for enlisted members discharged for immediate reenlistment was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008096

    Original file (20080008096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was separated from active duty and was told that he had a preexisting condition from a motorcycle accident. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training will be separated. Pertinent Army regulations provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014808

    Original file (20110014808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a separate DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) showing her honorable service before she reenlisted. Her DD Form 214 shows she completed 3 years, 5 months, and 17 days of net active service. This period of honorable service is correctly recorded in item 18 of her DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000253

    Original file (20150000253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract. Therefore, the entry "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD: 16 MARCH 2009 – 19 APRIL 2013" should be added to item 18 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 19...