Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008973
Original file (20140008973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008973 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (AD)) to show the AD service he completed in support of Operation Safe Sky.

2.  He states, in effect, that after the tragedy of 11 September 2001 he was placed on alert by his commanding officer during the middle of March 2002. However, he was never issued orders but only a certificate from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  His unit was placed at the security checkpoints to monitor and assist local police in their efforts to stop terrorism.  After about a week or so into the deployment, the commander informed the battalion that their pay information incorrectly reflected "Active Duty for Training."  However, the battalion was deployed under the authority of Title 10, U.S. Code and this administrative error would be corrected.  He forgot about it after a time and was surprised to find out it was never fixed.

3.  He provides an FAA Certificate dated 17 March 2002 and Leave and Earnings Statements for the period 3 April through 22 May 2002.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) on 
12 March 1997.  A review of his Official Military Personnel File found:

	a.  A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 for the period 12 March 1997 through 21 August 2003, issued upon his expiration of active status.  Item 
18 (Remarks) of this form lists the following AD periods completed during the period:

* 9 July - 18 November 1998
* 15 March - 21 May 2003

	b.  An NGB Form 23B (Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement), prepared on 17 June 2004 that shows during the period 14 April 2000 to 14 May 2002 the applicant's membership status was "B4 - Army National Guard Active Duty under Title 32 USC (U.S. Code), State Controlled."

3.  He provides his pay records which show he completed active duty for training (ADT) during the period 21 March to 15 May 2002 (65 days).  In addition, he provided a Completion Certificate for the National Guard Passenger Screening Checkpoint Training, issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation, FAA, dated 17 March 2002.

4.  His record does not show that he was issued a DD Form 214 for AD service completed during the calendar year 2002.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The separation document is to provide the individual with a complete and accurate documentary evidence of their military service.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty (emphasis added) of more than 90 days to include attendance at basic and advanced training and is prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  The DD Form 214 is not required for periods of less than 90 days.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show the AD service he completed in support of Operation Safe Sky.

2.  The available evidence shows he completed ADT during the period 
21 March to 15 May 2002; however, there is no evidence to confirm he was ordered to AD under the authority of Title 10 USC in support of Operation Safe Sky.  Further, he was issued an NGB Form 22 covering the period in question and this form does not list any period of AD service completed during 2002.

3.  The applicant should be aware that his record is void of a DD Form 214 for the period in question because regulatory guidance requires completion of 
90 days of AD before a DD Form 214 will be issued.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008973



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008973



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010698

    Original file (20130010698.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides * Memorandum from the MIARNG G-1 * Email exchange * Contested DD Form 214 * Active Duty for Training (ADT) orders * NGB Form 22 * Appointment orders * NGB Form 337 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Separation Authority on the DD Form 214, block 25, was incorrect in that it stated he was returning to Active Duty (AD); however, the applicant was not serving in any active status. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000167

    Original file (20140000167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade), to show specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private (PV1)/E-1 * item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Years and Months in Specialty), to show he served in his military occupational specialty (MOS) for 6 years instead of zero (0) years and months * item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) This Period), to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007780

    Original file (20120007780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 September 1976 to show in: * item 9e (Character of Service) the entry "Honorable" instead of "NA" * item 21 (Time Lost) the entry "None" instead of "NA" 2. The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-100 (Personnel Separations – Officer Personnel), paragraph 1-5, stated that normally an officer's service was characterized as honorable when the officer was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020291

    Original file (20120020291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence to show that her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 February 1979 is in error. The applicant's active duty service and prior inactive service appear to be correct on her DD Form 214 for the period end 31 May 1997.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028718

    Original file (20100028718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable," "under honorable conditions," or "general" rather than "uncharacterized." It specifies that "Soldiers of the ARNG and the USAR ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from active duty, revert to control of the appropriate Reserve Component" and that the "service of Soldiers specified in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020160

    Original file (20120020160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * Correction of her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show a date earlier than 23 December 1980 * Correction of item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" vice "No" 2. The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 28 March 1980 and she was separated from the USAR on 22 December 1980 for the purpose of enlisting in the ARNG. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310

    Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable. Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000026

    Original file (20120000026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 December 1993 and 8 May 2000, as follows: * Item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) * Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaigns Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal 2. The applicant provides: * 1993 and 2000 DD Forms 214 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004375

    Original file (20150004375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 ending on 27 February 2007 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * Listing of Iraq/Afghanistan Campaign Medals and designated phases * TDRL retirement orders * PDRL retirement orders * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * 2005 mobilization orders * 2007 release from active duty orders COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...