Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020160
Original file (20120020160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120020160 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect:

* Correction of her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show a date earlier than 23 December 1980
* Correction of item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" vice "No"

2.  The applicant states, in effect, her NGB Form 22 is incorrect because she entered active duty for training on 1 April 1980.  She adds that her equivalency diploma was not acknowledged because she was under a formal married name at the time of enlistment.  She was also denied a home loan because she did not serve long enough in the Army.

3.  The applicant provides:

* NGB Form 22 and DD Form 214
* U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Honorable Discharge Certificate
* New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) Honorable Discharge Certificate
* High School Equivalency Diploma
* Diploma for Human Relations Course of Study
* Marriage certificate
* Certificate of appreciation
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she enlisted in the USAR for 6 years on 26 March 1980.  Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) and allied documents listed her last name as "Taxxxra." 

3.  Item 22 (Verification of Personal Data) of her DD Form 1966/2 (Application for Enlistment) shows she attended Morris High School, Bronx, NY from February 1962 to June 1963 but she did not graduate.  

4.  She entered ADT on 1 April 1980.  She completed the required training and she was awarded military occupational specialty 72E (Telecommunications Center Operator).  She was honorably released from ADT to the control of the USAR on 2 September 1980.  

5.  Her DD Form 214 shows she completed 5 months and 2 days of creditable active service.  Item 16 of this form shows an "X" in the "No" block indicating she had not graduated from high school or an equivalent education. 

6.  On 7 December 1980, she requested a conditional release from the USAR for the purpose of enlisting in the ARNG.  

7.  She enlisted in the NYARNG on 23 December 1980.  Her DD Form 4 and allied documents listed her last name as "Taxxxra."  Item 22 of her DD Form 1966/2 shows she attended Morris High School, Bronx, NY from February 1962 to June 1963 but she did not graduate.  

8.  Her record contains a certificate, undated and under a different name, that shows she satisfactorily completed the comprehensive examination requirements prescribed by the State of NY and is entitled to a High School Equivalency Diploma, issued under seal of the University of Albany in the 1970 series. 
9.  Item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she received a General Educational Development (GED) diploma in 1970.  

10.  She was honorably separated from the NYARNG on 30 April 1985 and she was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) to complete her remaining military service obligation (MSO).  Her NGB Form 22 shows in:

* Item 4 (Date of Enlistment) - 80-12-23
* Item 8b (Effective Date [of Separation]) - 85-04-30
* Item 10a (Record of Service - Net Service This Period) - 04-04-08
* Item 10b (Prior Reserve Component Service) - 00-03-04
* Item 10c (Prior Active Federal Service) - 00-05-02
* Item 14 (Highest Education Level Successfully Completed) - GED

11.  She was honorably discharged from the USAR on 25 March 1986 (6 years from the date of enlistment of 26 March 1980) by reason of completion of her MSO. 

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty (emphasis added).  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service.  A DD Form 214 will be prepared for:

	a.  Active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of administrative separation (including separation by reason of retirement or expiration of term of service), physical disability separation, or punitive discharge under the Uniform Code of Military Justice;

	b.  Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous ADT, Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service.  Also, RC Soldiers separated for cause or physical disability regardless of the length of time served on active duty;

	c.  Army National Guard (ARNG) and USAR Soldiers mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 12301(a), 12302, or 12304, and ARNG Soldiers called into Federal service under Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 15 or section 12406, regardless of length of mobilization, when transitioned from active duty.  A Soldier who reports to a mobilization station and is found unqualified for active duty will be excluded from this provision.  He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and

	d.  RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days.  This includes completion of advanced individual training under the ARNG of the United States Alternate Training Program or USAR Split Training Program.

13.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) establishes standards, policies, and procedures for the management of the ARNG enlisted Soldiers.  It states, when preparing the NGB Form 22:

* Item 4 shows the date of enlistment and is obtained from the latest 
		DD Form 4
* Item 8b shows the effective date of separation or discharge and is obtained from the discharge/separation order
* Item 14 shows the highest civilian education level attained and is obtained from item 17 of the DA Form 2-1

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 28 March 1980 and she was separated from the USAR on 22 December 1980 for the purpose of enlisting in the ARNG.  She completed a total of 8 months and 26 days of service during this period, of which 5 months and 2 days was active service and 3 months and 26 days was Reserve service.  

2.  The applicant served on ADT in her USAR status from 1 April 1980 to 2 September 1980.  She completed 5 months and 2 days of active service and she was issued a DD Form 214 that captured this period of active duty service. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

3.  Upon her enlistment in the USAR and during her active duty service, she indicated she had attended Morris High School in New York but she did not graduate.  It is possible she did not provide her GED diploma at the time.  It is equally possible she provided her GED diploma but it was rejected since it contains a different name.  When her DD Form 214 was processed, it correctly checked the "No" block indicating she had not graduated from high school or had an equivalent education.   
4.  She enlisted in the ARNG on 23 December 1980 and she was separated from the ARNG on 30 April 1985.  Her NGB Form 22 correctly listed her date of entry in the ARNG on 23 December 1980.  It also correctly credited her with her prior active service of 5 months and 2 days as well as her inactive service of 3 months and 26 days.  There are no errors in the dates and/or period of service.  

5.  Nevertheless, although her DD Form 214 was properly constituted, since the ARNG accepted her GED diploma when she enlisted in the ARNG on 23 December 1980, it is reasonable to presume the USAR should have also accepted the same diploma.  As such, there is no harm to the Army or the Soldier if her DD Form 214, dated 2 September 1980, is corrected to show she was a high school graduate or equivalent. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ____x___  ____x ___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 16 of her DD Form 214 the "X" in the "No" block and adding an "X" in the "Yes" block. 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting her NGB Form 22 to show a date earlier than 23 December 1980.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020160





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020160



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001260

    Original file (20130001260.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * her DD Form 214 * a State of Louisiana Department of Education Official Results of GED Test, dated 19 June 1980 * Louisiana High School Equivalency Diploma, dated 27 June 1980 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct her DD Form 214 to show she completed her GED during her military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070909C070402

    Original file (2002070909C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016297

    Original file (20140016297.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 May 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140016297 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of item 15b (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she completed General Educational Development (GED). Although the applicant does not provide a copy of her GED or her high school diploma, based on her DD Form 214 for the period of 7 January 1999 to 15 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064497C070421

    Original file (2001064497C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant initialed paragraph 2, section III of the Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum, DA Form 5261, indicating he acknowledged, in connection with his enlistment for entitlement to the SLRP, that he met the listed eligibility criteria, i.e., that he had previous military service and was contracting to serve for 3 or more years in the Selected Reserve and, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014207

    Original file (20100014207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show “Yes” instead of “No.” 2. The DD Form 214 issued to him at that time contains an “X” in the “NO” block of Item 16. Therefore, item 16 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003992

    Original file (20110003992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement about her life, family, financial situation, and other issues * VA letter, dated 2 November 1984 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * MIARNG discharge letter, dated 3 February 1982 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) * Enlistment and discharge Standard Forms (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History) * SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination) prepared at the time of enlistment and discharge * Enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011677

    Original file (20100011677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service personnel records show the first and middle names "E____ S____." With regard to the applicant's request to amend item 16 of the DD Form 214 to show she was a high school graduate, the Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100011677 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100011677 2 ARMY BOARD FOR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013357

    Original file (20090013357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, corrections of Item 5 (Date of Birth) and Item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows in Item 5, his year of birth as 1956. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016568

    Original file (20080016568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his NGB (National Guard Bureau) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected: a. to show, on his NGB Form 22, his civilian education as high school (or equivalent) graduate and 2 years of college; b. to show, on both documents, an additional 30 days of active duty (AD) and total AD of 4 years, 10 months, and 30 days; c. to show, on his DD Form 214, his reentry (RE) code as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013532

    Original file (20080013532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 15b (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of her DD Form 214 be corrected to "YES"; c. Item 17 (Member Was Provided a Complete Dental Examination and All Appropriate Dental Services and Treatment Within 90 Days Prior To Separation) of her DD Form 214 be corrected to "YES;" and d. her characterization of service be changed to Honorable. The DD Form 214 shows she completed 2 months and 11 (71 days) days of prior active service. The dental appointment form the applicant provided is...