Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310
Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100030310 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable.

2.  The applicant states the only reason the training was considered uncharacterized was due to the short period of time for observation and that the absence of any disciplinary actions regarding her husband's service during that period would indicate that his service was in fact honorable.  He attended and completed the course of instruction and was returned to his drilling unit following his release from ADT.  She states the fact that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) reflects uncharacterized instead of honorable is now a bar to benefits that she might be eligible for as his widow.

3.  The applicant provides:

* the FSM's death certificate
* their marriage certificate
* the FSM's DD Form 214
* the FSM's NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) 


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM enlisted in the Minnesota Army National Guard (MNARNG) on 
4 June 1991.  

3.  He completed basic combat training during a period of ADT from 19 June to 22 August 1991.

4.  On 30 June 1992, he was again ordered to active duty for training.  He completed advanced individual training (AIT) and was awarded military occupational specialty 67N (UH-1 Helicopter Repairer).

5.  On 17 September 1992, the FSM was released from ADT and returned to his unit.  He completed 2 months and 18 days of active service that was uncharacterized.

6.  On 7 March 1996, he was discharged from the MNARNG and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).  His service in the MNARNG was characterized as honorable.

7.  Paragraph 4-2 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), then in effect, provided that the service of ARNG and USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT to which ordered and who are in an entry level status will be uncharacterized.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, then in effect, defined entry level status for ARNG and USAR Soldiers as the period from enlistment in the ARNG or USAR until 

180 days after beginning training for those Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period.  For those Soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option entry level status ended 90 days after beginning Phase II (AIT).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The FSM completed his IADT under the spit or alternate training options.  He completed his basic combat training during his first period of active duty.  He began his second phase, for AIT, on 30 June 1992.  When he was released from ADT he had not completed 90 days active service.  Therefore, he was in an entry level status.

2.  Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time.

3.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

4.  In view of the above, there is no basis to change the characterization of service on the FSM's DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100030310





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100030310



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010359

    Original file (20130010359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of release from ADT shows he completed 2 months and 23 days of active service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006154

    Original file (20130006154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to an honorable discharge * the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 2. Active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of administrative separation (including separation by reason of retirement or expiration of term of service), physical disability separation, or punitive discharge under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; b. RC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000887

    Original file (20100000887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the correct time in service and character of service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from ADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of expiration term of service, with an uncharacterized character of service. The DD Form 214 will be prepared for selected Soldiers, among which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028718

    Original file (20100028718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable," "under honorable conditions," or "general" rather than "uncharacterized." It specifies that "Soldiers of the ARNG and the USAR ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from active duty, revert to control of the appropriate Reserve Component" and that the "service of Soldiers specified in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020358

    Original file (20130020358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 12 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130020358 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the mother of a former service member (FSM), requests change of the FSM's uncharacterized discharge to honorable. Chapter 3 (Character of Service/Description of Service), paragraph 3-7a, states, in part, the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003836

    Original file (AR20130003836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: U.S. Army Human Resources Command orders D-05-516471, dated 10 May 2005, showing the applicant was discharged from the USAR effective 10 May 2005 with a characterization of honorable. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 149, copy of DA Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 10 May 2005, and copy of DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. In the case of a USAR Soldier on active duty (AD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526

    Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service." Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized even though they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002209

    Original file (20140002209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the characterization of his service from uncharacterized to honorable. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows in item 24 (Character of Service) the entry "UNCHARACTERIZED." It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001219

    Original file (20100001219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "uncharacterized" to "honorable." The applicant states he was released from active duty in September 1995 with an uncharacterized service and he was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in November 2001. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was release from ADT under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200...