BOARD DATE: 8 January 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140007444
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests promotion to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.
2. The applicant states:
a. He was wounded on 18 August 1971 after stepping on a land mine and did not receive notice of his promotion prior to being evacuated to Japan and then to Valley Forge Army Hospital.
b. He was medically retired in April 1972 in the rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 due to wounds sustained in Vietnam which made his continued service impossible.
c. He has a disposition form and letter of recommendation for promotion to the rank of SSG/E-6 signed by his commanding officers dated May 1971.
d. He asks if it is possible to receive the promotion strictly as a point of pride. He is in the process of making arrangements for his future burial and it would be an honor to be buried in full dress uniform in the rank of SSG.
3. The applicant provides:
* Promotion Points Worksheet
* DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form) (locally produced), dated 26 May 1971
* Department of the Army Office of the Adjutant General Letter Orders Number D 4-207, dated 5 April 1972
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 19 April 1972
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) for the period ending 19 April 1972
* DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 1 May 2000
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 October 1969 and trained as an armor crewman.
3. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to the rank of SGT effective 23 June 1970.
4. He arrived in Vietnam on 3 November 1970.
5. He provided a Promotion Points Worksheet and a recommendation for promotion to SSG dated 26 May 1971.
6. He was wounded on 18 August 1971 and medically evacuated to Japan on 21 August 1971 and then to Valley Forge Army Hospital on 3 September 1971 for further medical treatment.
7. On 19 April 1972, he was retired by reason of permanent disability.
8. His DD Form 214 shows in:
* item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) SGT
* item 5b (Pay Grade) E-5
* item 6 (Date of Rank) 28 June 1970
9. There are no orders in the available records that show he was promoted to SSG/E-6.
10. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, stated appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration for enlisted personnel to grades E-3 through E-9 were announced in routine orders.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The documentation provided by the applicant which shows he was recommended for promotion to SSG/E-6 by his commanding officer was carefully considered. However, the evidence of record shows he held the rank of SGT/E-5 at the time he retired on 19 April 1972.
2. Although he may have been recommended for promotion, there is no evidence which shows he was promoted to SSG by proper authority prior to his retirement on 19 April 1972. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X______ ___X_____ _X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140007444
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140007444
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012600
Letter Orders Number D-5-967, issued by Office of the Adjutant General on 27 May 1971, ordered his retirement in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 and placement on the TDRL with a combined rating of 90 percent, effective 7 June 1971. Medical facility commanders may consider patients for promotion under the normal promotion criteria of this chapter, together with the following guidance: (1) Individuals with recommended-list status for promotion to pay grade E-5 or E-6 resulting from selection by a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013008
General Orders Number 158, United States Army Hospital Japan, dated 4 August 1971, show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 3 August 1971 in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing in Item 5a and 5b of his DD Form 214 his rank as specialist four (SP4) and pay grade as E-4; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 2 June...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068644C070402
The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be amended to show his rank and grade as Sergeant (SGT), E-5 and to add the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Valorous Unit Emblem (i.e., the Valorous Unit Award), and the United Nations Service Medal. In addition to the awards shown on his DD Form 214, the DA Form 1577 dated 21 January 1983 authorized issuance of the BSM, the Valorous Unit Emblem (i.e., the Valorous Unit Award), the Vietnam Service Medal with two...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057821C070420
However, the applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) contains an entry in block 38 (record of assignments) that shows he was medically evacuated from the RVN to Ireland Army Hospital, Fort Knox, Kentucky, and that he arrived there as a patient on 2 August 1969. Given the evidence of record in this case, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that the hospital commander at Fort Knox promoted the applicant in accordance with applicable regulations in effect at the time based...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064602C070421
He was reduced to the rank of SP4/pay grade E-4, effective 27 December 1971, as the result of a summary court-martial. The Board reviewed the letter of recommendation from the applicant’s commanding officer which stated that the applicant had been promoted to E-6 on or about 17 November 1971. There are no orders in the applicant’s records which show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012927
In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents: a. a copy of a DA Form 2496, dated 1 November 1968, that shows the Executive Officer, Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade, recommended the applicant for promotion to SSG (E-6). Specifically, there is no evidence the applicant appeared before a promotion board, that he was recommended for promotion by the board, and placed on the E-6 promotion list. c. Therefore, based on the evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002076
A doctor at Walter Reed Army Medical Center told him he was going to recommend a disability rating of 100 percent to the MEB because of his heart condition, reappearance of jaundice, and other changes taking place in his body from the reaction to anti-malaria pill. The applicant provides: * DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 27 May 1965, 18 May 1968, 12 August 1971, and 28 July 1972 * service personnel records * two DA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012968
The applicant requests, in effect, correction to Item 3 (Social Security Number), Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank), Item 5c (Pay Grade), and Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his 17 June 1971 separation document (DD Form 214). The evidence of record further confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is also entitled to the Valorous Unit Award, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018042
The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to SFC/E-7 and placed on the Retired List that same rank/grade. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 on the date he retired from active duty. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017166
Having prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1970 in the rank of PFC and he held MOS's 13A and 13E. There are no orders in his records that show he ever served as a CPL/E-4 or was ever promoted to SGT/E-5. There is no evidence in his record that shows he went before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5.