Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012927
Original file (20130012927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  1 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012927 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6.

2.  The applicant states he served in the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 while assigned to Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  He was wounded and medically evacuated to a hospital in Japan.  He was then reassigned to the Medical Holding Company (MHC), U.S. Army Hospital, Fort Polk, LA.  He expected to receive his promotion to SSG (E-6) while in the hospital, but it never occurred.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), an endorsement to reassignment orders, his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 March 1966.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  Headquarters, 11th Infantry Brigade, Special Orders Number 254, dated
18 November 1967, promoted the applicant to SGT (E-5).

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  item 2 (Grade):  SGT E-5

   b.  item 3 (Date of Rank):  18 November 1967

   c.  item 31 (Foreign Service):  Vietnam from 6 December 1967 through 
23 October 1968;

   d.  item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) the highest rank/grade he attained was SGT (E-5) with a date of rank (DOR) of 18 November 1967; and

   e.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to:

* Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade (RVN), from 6 December 1967 through 19 October 1968
* Medical Holding Detachment (MHD), 7th Field Hospital (Japan), from 
20 through 22 October 1969
* MHC, U.S. Army Hospital, Fort Polk, LA, from 28 October 1968 through 6 March 1969

5.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Polk, LA, Special Orders Number 055, paragraph 063, dated 5 March 1969, as amended by paragraph 065, dated 5 March 1969, show the applicant was released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of SGT (E-5), effective 7 March 1969.

6.  A DD Form 214 shows the applicant was honorably REFRAD on 7 March 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation.  

   a.  He had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 24 days of net active service this period.
   b.  It also shows in:

* item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank):  SGT (Permanent)
* item 5b (Pay Grade):  E5
* item 6 (DOR):  18 November 1967

7.  A DD Form 215, issued on 8 September 2003, corrected the applicant's 
DD Form 214 to show his service in the RVN and his authorized awards.

8.  Office of The Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, Letter Orders Number 02-1067138, dated 23 February 1972, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Standby), in the rank of SGT, effective 13 March 1972.

9.  A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was promoted to grade E-6.

10.  In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents:

   a.  a copy of a DA Form 2496, dated 1 November 1968, that shows the Executive Officer, Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade, recommended the applicant for promotion to SSG (E-6).  The document does not contain a signature.

   b.  a 1st endorsement to reassignment orders (medical evacuee), dated 
9 November 1968, that shows the assistant adjutant forwarded records (presumably those of the applicant) based on assignment to the MHD, 7th Field Hospital.  It shows the individual was recommended and eligible for promotion and that the recommendation was signed by the commander.

11.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), in effect at the time, prescribes policies and procedures governing enlisted Soldiers. 

   a.  Chapter 7 (Promotions), section III (Promotion to Pay Grade E-5 and E-6) shows, in pertinent part, if the promotion authority approves the report of promotion board proceedings, the name of the Soldier will be integrated into the recommended list.

   b.  The Soldier will be eligible for promotion on the first day of the third month following date of this action.

   c.  Promotion point cut-off scores for each MOS, announced monthly by Headquarters, Department of the Army, will be used to promote Soldiers to pay grades E-5 and E-6.

   d.  A Soldier whose promotion points equal or exceed the announced MOS promotion point cut-off score will be promoted, if otherwise eligible.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to SSG (E-6).

2.  Records show the applicant was promoted to SGT (E-5) on 18 November 1967.  

3.  The evidence of record shows:

   a.  he was assigned to the MHC, U.S. Army Hospital, Fort Polk, LA, effective 28 October 1968; and

   b.  he was recommended (emphasis added) for promotion to grade E-6 on or about 1 November 1968.

4.  The recommendation for promotion from the applicant's former executive officer after he departed the unit could be a basis for the commander of his new unit to also recommend him for promotion and appearance before the promotion board.  However, there is no evidence this occurred.  Specifically, there is no evidence the applicant appeared before a promotion board, that he was recommended for promotion by the board, and placed on the E-6 promotion list.

5.  There is no evidence the applicant was promoted to grade E-6.  Specifically, there are no orders announcing any such promotion.

   a.  The applicant was honorably REFRAD on 7 March 1969 in the rank of SGT (E-5) and transferred to the USAR in that rank.

   b.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 13 March 1972 in the rank of SGT (E-5).

   c.  Therefore, based on the evidence of record, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's records to show he was promoted to grade E-6.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012927



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012927



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018191

    Original file (20130018191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, was cited for the following awards and decorations: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 1 July 1968 through 13 November 1968, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 31, dated 1969 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award), for the period 1 January 1969 through 30 June 1969, by DAGO Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006356

    Original file (20110006356.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * the terminal date of his Reserve obligation as 6 May 1985 * award of the Purple Heart on 1 July 1967 and Drill Sergeant Identification Badge on 24 August 1984 * his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 19D2X 2. He may use these documents as evidence of his service as a drill sergeant in the USAR and as evidence he held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009363

    Original file (20070009363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070009363 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show his correct rank and all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012600

    Original file (20140012600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Letter Orders Number D-5-967, issued by Office of the Adjutant General on 27 May 1971, ordered his retirement in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 and placement on the TDRL with a combined rating of 90 percent, effective 7 June 1971. Medical facility commanders may consider patients for promotion under the normal promotion criteria of this chapter, together with the following guidance: (1) Individuals with recommended-list status for promotion to pay grade E-5 or E-6 resulting from selection by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003620

    Original file (20130003620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Based on the promotion orders provided by the applicant and his orders for release from active duty, there is sufficient evidence to show there was an error when entering his rank and pay grade on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001885

    Original file (20090001885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) from specialist four (temporary) (SP4 (T))/E-4 to sergeant (SGT)/E-5. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation on 29 November 1968, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002059

    Original file (20150002059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military service records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The evidence of record shows: a. general orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device; b. the applicant qualified for award of the VSM and he participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019297

    Original file (20090019297.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states he is unsure of his entitlement to the CIB, but he served in a front line combat unit in Vietnam and was wounded in action. It also shows that the unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 12 March 1968 to 4 October 1968 by Department of the Army General Order Number 48, dated 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008377

    Original file (20140008377.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the rating period 1 August 2011 through 31 July 2012 * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 13 February 2013 * Certificate for award of the Army Commendation Medal, dated 19 February 2013 * Orders Number 335-0313, dated 30 November 2012 * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence to show the applicant was recommended for the E-6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000510

    Original file (20110000510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000510 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Following his tour in Vietnam, the applicant was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA for duty with Company A, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry. Item 33 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following appointments and reductions: * PVT/E-1 on 5 February 1968 * PV2/E-2 on 12 April 1968 [accelerated promotion] * PFC/E-3 on 20 July 1968 * SP4/E-4 on 12 January...