Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005090
Original file (20140005090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  25 November 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005090 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United State Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  His service in Vietnam is not noted on his DD Form 214.  In February 1970, he received orders to report to Vietnam.  At the time of his deployment, the Department of the Army was not aware his time in the service was limited.  He was instructed to proceed to Oakland Army Base where he would get his orders changed.  That did not happen and he proceeded to Vietnam.  In March 1970, about 3 weeks after his arrival in Vietnam, he was reassigned to San Antonio, TX.  Then Oakland Army Base issued orders for his reassignment to Fort Sam Houston, TX.

	b.  Due to his short time in country and change of orders assigning him and attaching him to different units, it appears to have been an oversight or a clerical error.

	c.  In December 2012, he was refused enrollment in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) due to being over the threshold for income.  He appealed the decision and was accepted in April 2013.  In January 2014, he received two letters from the VA claiming he was enrolled in error and his service in Vietnam could not be verified because it was not noted on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* reassignment orders, dated 5 March 1970
* VA documentation
 
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 July 1968.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 71H (personnel management specialist).

3.  Records show:

* he was issued orders to report to Vietnam in July 1969
* he submitted an application for compassionate reassignment
* he was attached to the Casual Detachment at Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 4 August 1969 pending receipt of permanent change of station reassignment orders from the overseas unit
* his compassionate reassignment or deferment from overseas was approved in February 1970

4.  He provided Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Oakland, CA, Special Orders Number 064, dated 5 March 1970, which show his reassignment was diverted and he was relieved from his Vietnam assignment (not joined).  He was reassigned to Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

5.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to Headquarters Company, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 8 March 1970.  On 2 July 1970, he was honorably released from active duty.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and National Defense Service Medal.

7.  Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 shows no foreign service.

8.  Item 31(Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 is blank.

9.  There is no evidence of record showing he served in Vietnam.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Although the applicant contends he served in Vietnam in February/March 1970, there is no evidence of record to support this contention.  The reassignment orders provided by the applicant show he was relieved from his Vietnam assignment and was diverted.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence with which to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005090



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005090



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011396

    Original file (20090011396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 20 March 1969. However, there is no evidence that he arrived in Oakland, proceeded to Vietnam, or returned from Vietnam. In the absence of additional documentary evidence that conclusively shows the exact date of departure (day, month, and year) and exact date of return (day, month, year), there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019272

    Original file (20080019272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. a copy of a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim); b. a copy of Special Order Number 151, Headquarters, The United States Army Medical Training Center (USAMTC), Fort Sam Houston, TX, dated 18 July 1969, assigning him to the US Army Overseas Replacement Station, Oakland, CA, not later than 19 August 1969, for transfer to Vietnam; and c. a copy of an Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs Form 200. The record shows the applicant never reported to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014287

    Original file (20100014287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his military records do not reflect his orders for Vietnam. The applicant’s request to correct his DD Form 214 by adding his foreign service in Vietnam was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the evidence of record. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence, to show he served in Vietnam at any time during his 3 years of active military service in the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019019

    Original file (20080019019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he had served 2 years, 3 months, and 7 days of foreign service during the period covered by the DD Form 214. Effective 1 October 1979, that regulation was changed and provided that a DD Form 214 would not be issued for periods of immediate reenlistment. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006238

    Original file (20090006238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to make his accounts of traumatic stress more believable to his DVA doctors, the applicant requests his time served in Vietnam be increased. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years of high school. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007795

    Original file (20100007795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a temporary duty (TDY) assignment in Vietnam. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was appointed to the temporary rank of SP5, effective 13 December 1968. Although he provided unit orders which show he was appointed as an acting NCO to the grade of SGT on 11 July 1969, the entry in item 33 of his DA Form 20 shows his appointed grade to SGT was lined out.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010026

    Original file (20140010026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his completion of the Methods of Instruction (MOI) course was omitted from his DD Form 214. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant has provided a certificate showing that he completed the MOI course in 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006688

    Original file (20130006688.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was discharged and was drawing disability when his father received the letter from the Army that he was AWOL. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 26 November 1969 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214 - Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 12 May 1981 * Special Orders Number 250 (discharge), dated 20 November 1969 * Special Orders Number 65 (Army Good Conduct Medal), dated 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022495

    Original file (20110022495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110022495 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000751C070206

    Original file (20050000751C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his overseas service time. The applicant's personnel records contain Headquarters, The United States Army Medical Training Center Special Orders Number 103 dated 15 May 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 22c on his DD Form 214 to show he served 2 years of foreign service.