Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006688
Original file (20130006688.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  2 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130006688 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests expunction of any and all documents related to him being in an absent without leave (AWOL) and/or being in a deserter status from his records, including: 

* DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet)
* DA Form 188 (Extract Copy of Morning Report)
* DA Form 268 (Report for Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions)
* DD Form 553 (Absentee Wanted by the Armed Forces)
* Commanding Officer's Inquiry

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  The information is in error; he was always there where he was ordered to be and he was never AWOL or a deserter.  During the time of the alleged offense, he was promoted to private first class (PFC)/E-3, received the Army Good Conduct Medal, and received an honorable discharge.  He also received his wages every month and the Army knew where he was at all times.  He was discharged and was drawing disability when his father received the letter from the Army that he was AWOL.  That letter was followed by a visit from the police.  He was unaware that these records were part of his file but he feels certain that he was rejected from civil service jobs as a result of the content.  

	b.  He has been blind since 2006 and he just became aware of the faulty and damaging records.  He was told they would be corrected in a 1970 phone call to Fort Dix, NJ.  It is extremely important to him that the error be corrected.  He is now advanced in years and likely will never be able to use the corrected records in his government employment but he wants his family and anyone else to see his records and know he served honorably. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 26 November 1969
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214 - Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 12 May 1981
* Special Orders Number 250 (discharge), dated 20 November 1969
* Special Orders Number 65 (Army Good Conduct Medal), dated 28 November 1969
* Honorable Discharge Certificate
* Commanding Officer's Inquiry
* DA Form 268
* DD Form 553
* DA Form 188
* Letter to his father
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 6 October 1964 and he held military occupational specialty 111.00 (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He was promoted to private/E-2 on 23 March 1965. 

3.  On 4 March 1965, his immediate commander initiated separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Inaptitude or Unsuitability), by reason of unsuitability. 

4.  The applicant acknowledged the notification and he elected not to have his case heard by a board of officers.  He also elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf. 

5.  On 15 March 1965, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 and directed the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate.  On 26 March 1965, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  His DD Form 214 shows his character of service as under honorable conditions (general).  He completed 5 months and 21 days of creditable active service during this period.

6.  On 1 August 1966, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) reviewed his discharge and determined he should have received an honorable characterization of service.  

7.  On 21 September 1966, the ADRB notified him that his characterization of service has been changed to honorable and that he had been issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate as well as a DD Form 214 reflecting his honorable characterization of service. 

8.  On 14 October 1968, he enlisted in the RA for 3 years.  After completion of basic combat training at Fort Knox, KY, he was issued Special Orders Number 345, on 10 December 1968, reassigning him to the U.S. Army Transportation School, Fort Eustis, VA, effective 5 January 1969.

9.  On 26 February 1969, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Dix, NJ, published Special Orders Number 57 assigning the applicant to the Medical Company, Walson Army Hospital for on the job training in military occupational specialty 91A (Medical Specialist).  He was promoted to PFC/E-3 on 8 April 1969. 

10.  On or about 13 June 1969, he was reassigned to Fort Sam Houston, TX, and on or about 20 August 1969, he was assigned to the Medical Hold Company, Brooke Army Medical Center, pending the outcome of his physical evaluation board. 

11.  On 20 November 1969, Headquarters, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, published Special Orders Number 250, ordering his discharge in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), by reason of disability effective 26 November 1969.  

12.  He was honorably discharged on 26 November 1969 by reason of disability. His DD Form 214, as amended by his DD Form 215, shows he completed 1 year, 1 month, and 13 days of creditable active service.  

13.  On 20 February 1970, several documents were initiated/processed by officials at Fort Dix, NJ: 

	a.  The Replacement Company, Fort Dix, NJ, submitted a DA Form 188 reporting him in an "Assigned Not Joined" status from Fort Eustis, VA, effective 23 February 1969, and placing him in an AWOL status effective 24 February 1969 and in a deserter status effective 31 March 1969.  

	b.  A DD Form 458 was initiated by the Replacement Company, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Dix, NJ, preferring court-martial charges against the applicant for one specification of absenting himself from his unit without proper authority on or about 24 February 1969.  

	c.  A DD Form 553 was initiated by the Personnel Officer, Replacement Detachment, indicating the applicant was in an AWOL status effective 24 February 1969. 

	d.  A Commanding Officer's Inquiry, signed by the Commander, Replacement Company, indicating the applicant was assigned to the Replacement Company from Fort Eustis, VA, by authority of Special Orders Number 30, issued by Fort Eustis, VA, with a report date of 16 February 1969.  The applicant departed his unit in an AWOL status on 24 February 1969 and he was placed in a deserter status on 1 April 1969. 

	e.  A letter from the Personnel Officer, Replacement Detachment, to the applicant's father informing him that his son (the applicant) was in an AWOL status which is considered a very serious offense. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  At some point in early 1969, the applicant was assigned to Fort Dix, NJ.  Shortly thereafter he was also reassigned to Fort Sam Houston, TX, due to an illness or an injury that led to his medical processing.  It also appears a physical evaluation board recommended his discharge by reason of disability.  

2.  On 20 November 1969, Fort Sam Houston, TX, ordered him discharged by reason of disability.  As such, he was honorably discharged on 26 November 1969 by reason of disability. 

3.  Nearly 4 months later, officials at Fort Dix determined that he failed to report from Fort Eustis, VA, to Fort Dix, NJ on 20 February 1969.  This triggered a series of events including reporting him in an AWOL/deserter status, initiating court-martial charges against him, flagging him, and notifying his father of this status.  

4.  It is clear that administrative errors and lack of communications between officials at Fort Dix and those at Fort Sam Houston led to this unfortunate situation.  He was not AWOL.  As such, he should be entitled to the expunction of any reference to AWOL from his records. 

BOARD VOTE:

__X___  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* removing from his service record the DD Form 458, DA Form 188, DA Form 268, DD Form 553, and Commanding Officer's Inquiry
* ensuring the documents he provided with his application are not filed in his service record
* returning this Record of Proceedings to the ABCMR for filing




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006688





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006688



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008333

    Original file (20120008333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge under honorable conditions to an honorable discharge. The applicant's record contains the following DA Forms 268 showing: a. on 29 June 1971 while assigned to Fort Gordon, GA, he was pending disciplinary action for being AWOL from 8 January through 15 June 1971; b. on 28 September 1971, an AWOL charge was dropped (no reason shown) and the applicant was reassigned to Fort Dix for ultimate assignment to the U.S. Army Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074844C070403

    Original file (2002074844C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 13 May 1974, the applicant was discharged accordingly. In December 1970, long before the applicant was returned to military control after being found by the FBI in 1974, the unit commander from his unit in the RVN sent a letter to his mother informing her of his AWOL status.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023742

    Original file (20100023742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was only 16 years old at the time of his enlistment. The applicant's request for upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge has been carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support this request. _________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019272

    Original file (20080019272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. a copy of a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim); b. a copy of Special Order Number 151, Headquarters, The United States Army Medical Training Center (USAMTC), Fort Sam Houston, TX, dated 18 July 1969, assigning him to the US Army Overseas Replacement Station, Oakland, CA, not later than 19 August 1969, for transfer to Vietnam; and c. a copy of an Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs Form 200. The record shows the applicant never reported to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007930C071029

    Original file (20060007930C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge and that his rank and pay grade be restored to sergeant, E-5. The application submitted in this case is dated 28 May 2006 and was received for processing on 7 June 2006. Documents related to the applicant's discharge show that on 27 May 1970, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provision of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Chapter 10.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011396

    Original file (20090011396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 20 March 1969. However, there is no evidence that he arrived in Oakland, proceeded to Vietnam, or returned from Vietnam. In the absence of additional documentary evidence that conclusively shows the exact date of departure (day, month, and year) and exact date of return (day, month, year), there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021773

    Original file (20100021773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows he was in the custody of the law at the time he was inducted into the Army of United States. Paragraph 5-5b of the same regulation states that an individual claiming erroneous induction because of a procedural right as provided by the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 may submit a request for release from custody and control of the Army. The available evidence shows he was charged with a Selective Service violation on 15 June 1966, for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015058

    Original file (20090015058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds he was removed from his duty station and transferred to a battery that was far away only one day after he got married. At the time he had completed 2 years of net active service. Item 38 of his DA Form 20 shows his duty MOS was 710 and his principal duty assignment was "Clerk AIT" at the USAMTC, Fort Sam Houston.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009132

    Original file (20150009132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of all documents pertaining to an erroneous dropped from the rolls (DFR) status from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant states her unit at advanced individual training (AIT), D Company, 1/222 Aviation Regiment, Fort Eustis, VA, failed to notify her gaining unit, the Replacement Company, 101st Soldier Support Battalion (SSB) at Fort Campbell KY of the requirement to extend her assignment for training in 2002. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064297C070421

    Original file (2001064297C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct (fraudulent entry, conviction by civil court, and absence without leave or desertion).