Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005064
Original file (20140005064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  30 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005064 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his first name as "Darwin" vice "Dawin" and add the Presidential Unit Citation and any other awards to which he may be entitled.

2.  The applicant states his first name was spelled incorrectly on his DD Form 214 and not all of his awards were listed.  His unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for "involvement" while stationed in Erlangen, Germany and the Berlin Crisis.  His DD Form 214 does not list any awards.

3.  The applicant provides:

* driver’s license
* letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 
31 January 2014
* two DA Forms 24 (Service Record)
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 

or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 13 June 1960.  He held military occupational specialty 131.00 (Armor Crewman) and attained the rank/grade of specialist four/E-4.

3.  His DA Forms 24 and 20 show his first name was spelled as "Darwin" and:

	a.  He was assigned to Germany from 11 November 1960 to 15 May 1962 and he served with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Combat Command B (CCB), 4th Armored Division from 12 November 1960 to 14 May 1962.

	b.  He had “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings.

	c.  Special Orders (SO) Number 156, issued by Headquarters, 4th Training Regiment, U.S. Army Training Command, Fort Knox, KY, on 27 July 1960 awarded him the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1).

	d.  He was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Tank Weapons Bar on 5 October 1960.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 May 1962.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 3 days of net active service, of which 1 year, 6 months, and 14 days were credited as foreign and/or sea service. His DD Form 214 does not list any awards. 

5.  Neither Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), dated 4 June 1962, nor Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), dated 29 January 1988, show that Headquarters and Headquarters Company, CCB, 4th Armored Division was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation during the applicant’s period of service.

6.  Research shows the 4th Armored Division received four unit awards, all of which were awarded for service in World War II.  The last of the 4th Armored Division’s unit awards were published by General Orders in 1950.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 
27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.  

8.  A review of his service records shows no derogatory information in the form of time lost, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions, or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for and awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 13 June 1960 through 15 May 1962.

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His DA Forms 24 and 20 show the applicant’s first name spelled as "Darwin." Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct spelling of his first name.  

2.  His DA Forms 24 and 20 show he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Tank Weapons Bar.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to add these badges.  

3.  He served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to add this award.

4.  The applicant served honorably during the period 13 June 1960 through 
15 May 1962.  There is no derogatory information in the form of nonjudicial punishment or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Additionally, there are no entries in his record to indicate that his commander denied him this award and he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  It appears he met the criteria for this award.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and correction of his DD Form 214 to add this award.

5.  There is no historical evidence or evidence of record, and the applicant has not provided evidence, to show his unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation during the period of his service.  As such, there is insufficient evidence to add this award to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  __X______  ___X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  correcting his DD Form 214 to show his first name as listed on his 
DA Form 24;

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 
13 June 1960 through 15 May 1962; and

	c.  adding to his DD Form 214 the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) 
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Tank Weapons Bar




2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the Presidential Unit Citation. 



      _________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005064





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005064



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003855

    Original file (20140003855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the: * Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service stars * Presidential Unit Citation * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005372

    Original file (20110005372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24A (Service Record), covering the period of service from 7 December 1948 through 16 October 1951, shows in: a. section 7 (Combat Record): Chinese Communist Forces (CCF) Intervention, First United Nations (UN) Counteroffensive, and CCF Spring Offensive campaigns; b. section 9 (Remarks - Administrative): he was discharged on 16 October 1951, his character and efficiency were both rated as "excellent," and he had 34 months and 10 days of continuous service credit toward...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011289

    Original file (20120011289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form further shows he was awarded the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (5th Award) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Vietnam Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) 13. Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 26 February 1969 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012637

    Original file (20120012637.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Purple Heart with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (or whatever award may be appropriate for his service in the 2nd Infantry Division, Korea); b. formal award of the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal; and c. correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards in addition to those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018235

    Original file (20140018235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001541C070205

    Original file (20060001541C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, the “UNQ (BAR)” [Browning Automatic Rifle]; the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, the Good Conduct Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation with First Oak Leaf Cluster. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005658

    Original file (20140005658.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending on 24 April 1967, to add and/or award any awards to which he is entitled. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea from 26 November 1962 to 1 January 1964. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016922

    Original file (20100016922.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Authorized or Awarded) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 October 1968 shows he was awarded: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Army Commendation Medal * Purple Heart * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle) 8. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020131

    Original file (20140020131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; and b. showing that, in addition the awards shown on the DD Form 214, the applicant is also authorized the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000808

    Original file (20100000808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ARCOM order provided by the applicant is also contained in his military records. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 3...