IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 2 September 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140005014
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter.
2. He states he was retired on 25 November 2009 and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). He is still in a TDRL status as he awaits the Army's decision on his case. He would like to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter; however, the application website states he may not be eligible. The transfer program started before he was separated from the Army. He has contacted the Department of Defense, and he was told he was in a window of eligibility and should submit a request. This is a benefit he earned and would like to transfer to his daughter. His daughter will graduate in May 2014. University paperwork has now begun, which is why he did not identify the error sooner.
3. He provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 25 November 2009.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 17 March 2004, the applicant enlisted in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) for a period of 6 years.
3. On 6 March 2007, he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA).
4. On 25 November 2009, he was retired and placed on the TDRL the following day. The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows he had completed:
* 2 years, 8 months, and 20 days of net active service this period
* 7 months and 10 days of prior active service
* 2 years, 4 months, and 9 days of total prior inactive service
5. Department of Defense (DOD) Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003, dated 22 June 2009, established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.
a. Eligible individuals include members of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, are eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:
b. have at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agree to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or
c. have at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, are precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agree to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or
d. were or became retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013. (A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.)
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was transferred to the TDRL after the provisions for transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to dependents went into effect. At the time of his transfer to the TDRL he had completed 5 years, 8 months, and 19 days of combined service in the Selected Reserve and RA. Based on his total service, he does not qualify for transfer of education benefits under any of the categories defined in DOD DTM 09-003.
2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140005014
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140005014
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005014
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter. (A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.) The applicant was transferred to the TDRL after the provisions for transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to dependents went into effect.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002581
The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his three daughters. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015264
The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. f. A child may use the benefit while the eligible individual remains in the Armed Forces or after separation from active duty after completing the additional service required to transfer the educational assistance under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Therefore, he is not eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005769
Eligible individuals include a member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he transferred at least 1 month of his education benefit to his daughter and that he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement. As a result, the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01355
Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003- Post-9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3g (2) (a) 2 states: "An individual may not add dependents after retirement or separation from the Armed Forces, but may modify the number of months of the transferred benefit after retirement or separation for those dependents who had received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement." To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022789
He was placed on the TDRL on 9 December 2009 and he did not transfer his educational benefits prior to his retirement. The applicant has provided no evidence to support his contention that he not advised regarding his education benefits or that he was improperly advised regarding his eligibility for the Post 9-11 GI Bill Transferability Program. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017538
He states Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003, subject: Post-9/11 GI Bill, refers to 15 years to use benefits and then refers to a requirement to be on active duty to transfer benefits. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve Component service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill...
CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2012-121
For a member of the Coast Guard, when the Coast Guard is operating as a Service of the DHS, the term means, “the Secretary of Homeland Security has jurisdiction over the service member.” Coast Guard ALCOAST 377/09, June 26, 2009 The Coast Guard released ALCOAST 377/09 on June 26, 2009 (internet release was authorized) announcing the Department of Defense and Coast Guard policy concerning Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits and the transferability of unused benefits to family members. In paragraph 1...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01722
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01722 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013226
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his education benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely...