IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 28 May 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150005769
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter.
2. The applicant states he was instructed at the time of enrollment that he could always transfer remaining months to his daughter as long as she was enrolled. He was not informed that if he retired he could not transfer the months. If he had been informed he would have transferred the months before he retired.
3. The applicant provides:
* a screen approval, dated 8 August 2009
* a letter, dated 6 November 2014, from the Department of Defense (DOD), Manpower Data Center (MDC), Seaside, CA
* a letter, dated 7 January 2015, from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) to the applicant's Congressional representative
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. He previously completed 2 years, 5 months, and 27 days of service in the Army National Guard in an enlisted status.
2. On 8 June 1989, he was appointed a warrant officer one in the Arkansas Army National Guard (ARARNG).
3. On 7 January 2007, he was notified he had completed the required years of service for eligibility for retired pay at age 60.
4. The transfer request screen, dated 3 August 2009, shows the status of his TEB request as approved. He lists his daughter for 0 months and his son for
36 months.
5. On 16 April 2012, he was discharged from the ARARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve. He completed 25 years of qualifying service.
6. A letter, dated 6 November 2014, from the DOD Manpower Data Center, congratulated him on having been approved by his Service to transfer his unused Post 9/11 GI Bill Benefits to members of his immediately family. The letter showed the DOD MDC reflects that his approval for his son - transfer 36 months. His daughter was not listed. The following information was shown
* Transfer Request Date: 3 August 2009
* Transfer Status: Request Approved
* Transfer Status Date: 3 August 2009
* Obligation End Date: 3 August 2009
7. The applicant provided a letter, dated 7 January 2015, from the NGB to his Congressional representative. NGB stated the applicant's initial request on
3 August 2009 showed he originally transferred all 36 months of benefit to his son on the DOD TEB online database. He did not transfer any benefits to his daughter before his retirement from the ARARNG on 16 April 2012. Since he is no longer in the ARARNG, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to additional dependents. NGB stated they did not have the authority to grant an exception.
8. An email, dated 24 April 2015, was received that was from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Review Boards). According to the email, the Office of General Counsel opined that it is law
can only transfer while on active duty and transfer is only effected if something (e.g. 1 month or more) is submitted by the individual. However, OSD found misunderstanding was common and they placed a flag in the system to ensure members understood they had to transfer at least 1 month before leaving the Service. This was not in place at the time the applicant elected transferability.
9. The email was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. The applicant stated. He contacted the helpline when he completed the form to ensure that it was completed correctly. When he spoke with the person who assisted him in completing the form he explained that he had 32 months of benefits that he wanted to set aside for his son and that he wanted to make any unused portion available to his daughter. He was told that in order for his daughter to be eligible for benefits, he simply needed to include her name on the list of dependents. He added her name to the list, but was not told that he was required to put a value of one or more months in the corresponding box prior to his departure from the ARARNG. It was clearly his intent to make all earned benefits available to both of his children
10. DOD Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003, dated 22 June 2009, established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.
a. Eligible individuals include a member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill. For Soldiers eligible for retirement on or before 1 August 2009 there was no additional service required.
b. An individual transferring an entitlement to educational assistance under this section shall:
* designate the dependent or dependents to whom such entitlement is
being transferred
* designate the number of months of such entitlement to be transferred
to each dependent
c. An individual approved to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section may transfer such entitlement to the individual's family member only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.
d. An individual may add new dependents, modify the number of months of the transferred entitlement for existing dependents, or revoke transfer of entitlement while serving in the Armed Forces.
e. An individual may add new dependents only while serving in the Armed Forces.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement. However, he transferred 36 months of benefits to his son and 0 months to his daughter. He contends he was unaware of the requirement to transfer at least 1 month to his daughter prior to leaving active duty. The program was implemented in July 2009. The applicant submitted his request for TEB on 3 August 2009.
2. According to DTM 09-003, dated 22 June 2009, an individual had to designate at least one month to each dependent he or she wished to transfer education benefits to. This could only be done while the member was on active duty. Modification of the number of months or adding additional dependents could only be done while the member was still serving in the Armed Forces.
3. Nevertheless, during the initial implementation of this new program, many Soldiers at all grades were confused regarding their eligibility and/or the procedure to apply for such benefit. This confusion was exacerbated by heavy use of the DOD website and the lack of proper log-in credentials for those who may have signed out on transition leave within 60 to 90 days of the program's implementation. Similarly, officials at some education centers may have also been confused regarding the implementation instructions and may not have conducted proper counseling.
4. OSD found misunderstanding was common and they placed a flag in the system to ensure members understood they had to transfer at least 1 month before leaving the Service. This was not in place at the time the applicant elected transferability.
5. His transfer request clearly shows his intent to transfer benefits to both his son and his daughter. It is reasonable to presume that had the applicant been aware of the procedure and requirement to transfer at least 1 month of his benefits to each of his dependents while in an active status he would have done so. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he transferred at least 1 month of his education benefit to his daughter and that he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement.
BOARD VOTE:
____X___ ____X___ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer at least 1 month his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his daughter prior to his retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.
__________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150005769
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150005769
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002581
The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his three daughters. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017538
He states Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003, subject: Post-9/11 GI Bill, refers to 15 years to use benefits and then refers to a requirement to be on active duty to transfer benefits. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve Component service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010903
Public Law 110-252 also established the legal requirements for the transferability of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The applicant's last day of service with the Army National Guard was 31 January 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 January 2011. As the applicant failed to transfer the benefits to his son while...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01355
Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003- Post-9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3g (2) (a) 2 states: "An individual may not add dependents after retirement or separation from the Armed Forces, but may modify the number of months of the transferred benefit after retirement or separation for those dependents who had received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement." To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015264
The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. f. A child may use the benefit while the eligible individual remains in the Armed Forces or after separation from active duty after completing the additional service required to transfer the educational assistance under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Therefore, he is not eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000263
The applicant states in August 2009 he transferred GI Bill education benefits his dependents as follows: his son Colton 34 months, his son Grayson 1 month, and his wife Charlene 1 month. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show when he transferred his education benefits he allocated 34 months to Colton, 1 month to Charlene, and 1 month to Grayson. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020425
The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his son under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve Component service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011763
The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer unused education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. Public Law 110-252, section 3020, limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022465
The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his dependents under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request because there is no evidence the applicant attempted to transfer the benefit to his son prior to leaving active or Reserve military service. A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016902
On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. Public Law 110-252, section 3020, limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected...