Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004783
Original file (20140004783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  23 October 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004783 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he received two bullet and shrapnel wounds in
1967 while stationed in the Republic of Korea.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 July 1966.  His records show he completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty 62E (Heavy Construction Equipment Operator).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist five/E-5.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Korea from
19 November 1966 to 9 July 1968.

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 does not show he was placed into a "Patient" status at a medical treatment facility at any time during his period of service.

5.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank.

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

7.  There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart.

8.  His DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge/Report of Separation from Active Duty) do not show award of the Purple Heart.

9.  There is no evidence in the available record showing he sustained any injuries as a result of hostile action or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.  

10.  The applicant provides a letter from the VA wherein a Veteran Service Officer with the State of Alabama VA identifies a Soldier who attests he stepped on a land mine that wounded the applicant.

11.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 
1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that he should be awarded the Purple Heart was carefully considered.

2.  There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows he sustained an injury as a result of hostile action or that he received treatment for injuries sustained as a result of hostile action.

3.  Although the applicant provided a letter of support which indicated he was wounded, this letter is not supported by evidence of record and therefore is insufficient evidence to support his request.

4.  Absent such evidence, there is no basis to grant the award requested.

5.  This action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004783





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004783



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024367

    Original file (20100024367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains his DD Form 230 (Service Record) which shows no entries in Section 8 (Wounds Received through Enemy Action). Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows he sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the Purple Heart. _______ _ __X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017638

    Original file (20140017638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action. However, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019935

    Original file (20110019935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 5 February 1954 to show his award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 February 1954 * Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) letter, dated 9 January 2001 * DVA Hospital Summary, dated 22 July 1973 * DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 22 June 1988 * Letter, dated 18 February 1971, from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006927

    Original file (20120006927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the initial review of the applicant's case the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to confirm the applicant was entitled to award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides a self-authored statement and a newspaper clipping indicating he received some shrapnel wounds in the leg and face as well as a VA Rating Decision which shows he received service connection for a post shrapnel injury to his right forearm. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023337

    Original file (20110023337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. While the applicant's sincerity is not in doubt, in the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds and that treatment was made a matter of official record, the third-party statement provided is insufficient evidence on which to base awarding him the Purple Heart...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002157

    Original file (20140002157.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending on 14 December 1973 to show the: * Bronze Star Medal * Purple Heart * Joint Service Commendation Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Korea Defense Service Medal 2. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, in addition to a record of treatment and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010716

    Original file (20100010716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following: * A copy of his retirement DD Form 214 * Two self-authored statements * Copies of two printed pages * A copy of Department of the Army (DA) Orders F-11-015285 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His retirement DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. However, his record does not contain any evidence nor did he provide any evidence that indicates he sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, he was treated by medical personnel for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006324

    Original file (20130006324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. Until 23 August 1951, Army Regulation 600-45 (Decorations), which governed the award of Army decorations, stated that for the purpose of considering an award of the Purple Heart, a “wound” is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained while in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014478

    Original file (20100014478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090014079 on 23 February 2010. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he received a second wound or injury as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010253

    Original file (20110010253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows he sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient basis for awarding him the Purple Heart. With respect to the second period of service, the evidence of records shows the applicant suffered an accidental self-inflicted wound that led to his medical evacuation, treatment,...