IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 May 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140017638 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states he was awarded the medal towards the end of his Vietnam service. The documentation (certificate and orders) were to be mailed to his next duty station. His duty station was changed upon leaving Vietnam. He never received the Purple Heart certificate. It may have been sent to the wrong location. He has the Purple Heart in his possession but he wants it documented on his DD Form 214. This would help him with benefits. 3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 ending on 11 December 1970, page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), and a letter from the National Personnel Records Center. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 July 1963 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 911.10 (or 91B) (Medical Specialist). He served in Korea from 7 February 1964 to 7 January 1965. 3. While in Korea, he was honorably discharged on 25 September 1964 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he was awarded or authorized the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. 4. He reenlisted in the Regular Army on 26 September 1964. He was assigned mostly to Fort Knox, KY. He was honorably discharged on 30 September 1967 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal. 5. He reenlisted in the Regular Army on 1 October 1967. He served in Vietnam from on or about 31 January 1968 to on or about 22 January 1969. He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 22nd Infantry, 4th Infantry Division. 6. Following completion of his Vietnam tour, he was reassigned to Fort Knox, KY, and then Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. He was honorably discharged on 11 December 1970. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized: * two overseas service bars * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Combat Medical Badge * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Vietnam Cross of Gallantry * Army Commendation Medal with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster * Good Conduct Medal 7. There is no evidence of record that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action. Nothing in several typical sources shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. a. His medical records are not available for review with this case. Medical records confirm an injury or a wound occurred, if treatment was needed, and when treatment was rendered. b. Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 does not show a combat wound or injury. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 9, stated a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20. This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40. c. His personnel records do not contain an official Army message or a Western Union telegram notifying his next of kin of an injury or wound sustained in action. This was the proper notification procedure for injuries at the time. d. His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing. This is a listing of Vietnam era casualties commonly used to verify entitlement to award of the Purple Heart. e. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows: * injury caused by enemy bullet * shrapnel or other projectile created by enemy action * injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap * injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological, or nuclear agent * injury caused by vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire and/or concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions 9. Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) states the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The criteria for the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 2. The applicant's service record is void of any documentary evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of combat. His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing. There is nothing in multiple typical sources including his medical records that confirm he was wounded as a result of hostile action or that he required treatment by medical personnel. 3. The applicant's contention and sincerity are not in question. However, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___x____ ____x___ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140017638 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140017638 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1