Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006927
Original file (20120006927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  16 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006927 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier petition for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he should have received the Purple Heart for the injuries he sustained in the Republic of Korea.  He claims he was struck by shrapnel in his left leg by the same shrapnel that hit his right leg.

3.  The applicant provides:

* five pages of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision
* a note from the 1st Battalion Aid Station
* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States)
* a newspaper article
* a self-authored statement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110008328, on 11 October 2011.

2.  The applicant provided a self-authored statement and a VA Rating Decision.  These statements were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board.

3.  During the initial review of the applicant's case the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to confirm the applicant was entitled to award of the Purple Heart.  It further noted the applicant’s records could not be located and were presumed to have been destroyed during a fire at the records repository in 1973.  However, the applicant’s separation document was available for the Board’s review and was used in consideration of the applicant’s case.

4.  The applicant’s record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 February 1951.  He successfully completed training and was awarded specialty 1745 (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He was honorably released from active duty on 2 February 1953 and transferred to the Enlisted Reserve Corps.  

5.  The applicant’s record is void of any orders or other documents which indicate he was recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority while serving on active duty.

6.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board's staff reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Korean War casualty listing.  There was no entry pertaining to the applicant on this listing.

7.  His DD Form 214 shows the following pertinent information:

	a.  item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) he completed 6 months of foreign and/or sea service;

	b.  item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show award of the Purple Heart; and 

	c.  item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces), contains the entry "None."

8.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement and a newspaper clipping indicating he received some shrapnel wounds in the leg and face as well as a VA Rating Decision which shows he received service connection for a post shrapnel injury to his right forearm.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart due to wounds he received while in the Republic of Korea was carefully reconsidered and it was determined there is still insufficient evidence to support this contention.  

2.  The Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for this decoration; rather, the individual is entitled to it upon meeting specific criteria.  Award of the Purple Heart requires a Soldier to have been injured or wounded by hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment for wounds or injuries received in action must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  The Board begins its consideration of each case with a presumption of regularity; that is, what Army records reflect is correct and the burden of proving otherwise rests with the applicant.  

4.  In this case, item 29 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 contains the entry "None" indicating he was not wounded in action.  In addition, his name is not included on the Korean casualty listing, the official DA list of Korean battle casualties.  

5.  Although he claims he was wounded, there is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds or that his treatment was made a matter of official record.  In the absence of evidence which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, regrettably, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.

6.  The action in regard to the Purple Heart in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X __  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110008328, dated 11 October 2011.




      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006927



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006927



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010881

    Original file (20090010881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence, to support his contention that he was wounded by shrapnel in the left leg while he was in Korea and that the wound was the result of hostile action. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to correct his records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008650

    Original file (20080008650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080008650 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces), of the applicant’s DD Form 214, shows he received a gunshot wound to the left leg in Wonju, Korea, on 12 February 1951. He stated that his disabilities were the result of wounds received while in combat with the enemy in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018322

    Original file (20080018322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 September 2008, by letter, the Chief, Military Awards Branch, HRC-Alexandria, VA notified the applicant that after a careful review of the documentation submitted by him, it was determined that the collapse of the bridge was not influenced by enemy action or sabotage and that the report of interment erroneously showed the date of death as 17 April 1951 as a result of a shrapnel wound to the leg, but the evidence suggests that the FSM died on 30 March 1951 as a result of drowning. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009080

    Original file (20090009080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded during the Korean conflict as a result of enemy action, but was not awarded the Purple Heart. In his undated, self-authored statement, the applicant states that while on the front line in Korea, he experienced a partial loss of hearing and an ear ache in his right ear. He was taken to the forward aid station and then to the rear to see an ear doctor near Seoul, Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003536

    Original file (20120003536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003536 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was awarded a Purple Heart for wounds received on 17 January 1951.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008605

    Original file (20100008605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s self-authored statement and eyewitness statements are new evidence that warrant consideration by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009932

    Original file (20090009932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded by shrapnel from enemy fire in Korea on 29 May 1953 and that at the time of receiving the wound, he told the medic or doctor that he did not want the Purple Heart for fear of a telegram going home to his wife. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006579

    Original file (20140006579.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant does not provide any new evidence. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Applicants do not have a right to a hearing before the ABCMR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002119

    Original file (20120002119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA documents severe hearing loss in both ears and this condition has left him with poor communication skills which cannot be improved and has affected his employability since his return from Vietnam in 1970. c. A second self-authored statement, dated 22 December 2011, in which he describes two additional sapper attacks during his service in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019333

    Original file (20090019333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he received the Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars but never received the Purple Heart for shrapnel he received in his lower right back during the Korean War. The applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), 8 pages of newspaper articles, and page 5 and 6 of an undated Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) decision letter from the VA. There were no service medical records available to...