Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004708
Original file (20140004708 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004708 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reenlistment (RE) Code be changed from an RE-2 to RE-1 and that he be issued a National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) set.

2.  The applicant states he was separated for the convenience of the government and should have received a RE Code of RE-1 as an RE-2 code is detrimental and unwarranted.  He also states that he was never issued an NDSM Medal set.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was inducted on 9 September 1966.  He completed his basic training at Fort Benning, Georgia and his advanced individual training as a supply clerk at Fort Dix, New Jersey before being transferred to Korea on 8 January 1967. 

3.  He departed Korea on 9 January 1968 and was transferred to Fort Polk, Louisiana where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 10 June 1968 for the convenience of the government.  He had served 1 year, 9 months, and 2 days of active service and was issued an RE Code of RE-2.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the NDSM and his marksmanship badges.

4.  Service medals and awards are not issued by the ABCMR.  However, the applicant may obtain his medals by submitting his request in writing to:  National Personnel Records Center, ATTN: Army Reference Branch, 1 Archives Drive, St. Louis, Missouri  63138.  This issue will not be further addressed in this Record of Proceedings.

5.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.  At the time, RE Codes of “1” or “2” could be issued for personnel who are fully qualified for reenlistment depending on the circumstances surrounding the separation.

6.  RE-2 applies to persons who are fully qualified for reenlistment and are separated for the convenience of the government and reenlistment is not contemplated. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his RE Code should be changed to RE-1 has been noted and found to lack merit.  RE Code RE-2 was issued because the applicant was REFRAD due to the convenience of the government.

2.  RE Code RE-2 has the same effect as RE-1 but simply denotes the reason the applicant was separated.  It carries no negative connotation and reflects that the individual is fully qualified for reenlistment. 

3.  Accordingly, there is no error or injustice in his case and no basis to grant his request for a change in his RE Code.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x_____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004708





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004708



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003138

    Original file (20130003138.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he served in Korea from November 1959 to October 1960 and that all of his authorized awards be added to his DD Form 214. He had served 3 years and 22 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he served 1 year and 19 days of foreign service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001264

    Original file (20080001264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080001264 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He was issued a RE Code of “RE-3B.” 9. Notwithstanding the action by the Board to award the applicant the AGCM, the applicant was properly issued an RE Code of RE-3B based on his having lost time during his last period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005420

    Original file (20080005420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge reflects that he was awarded the Distinguished Unit Citation, the Korean Service Ribbon with one bronze service star, the United Nations Service Medal and the Purple Heart. Accordingly, that award should be awarded and added to his records at this time as well. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the ROK-KWSM and by adding that award and his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017777C070206

    Original file (20050017777C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded a fourth bronze service star and that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROKPUC), the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL), and his Letter of Commendation. On 27 December 2004, the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) authorized the issuance of the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010971C070208

    Original file (20040010971C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Department of Defense assigned responsibility to the Department of the Air Force for distribution of the Korean War Service medal to eligible veterans or their surviving next of kin. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to this Board to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010325C070208

    Original file (20040010325C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    James B. Gunlicks | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Accordingly, he should have been awarded the NDSM at the time of his REFRAD on 27 February 1961 or on his discharge on 12 October 1964. Although the KDSM was not authorized until 2004, the applicant served in Korea from October 1958 to November 1959, which is after the initial eligibility date of 28 July 1954.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014232C070205

    Original file (20060014232C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his father, now a deceased former service member (FSM) previously applied to the Board to receive a promotion to the pay grade of E-5 and to have decorations awarded to him that he should have received. He goes on to state that the Board, in a previous application, had granted him (the FSM) the awards he requested; however, in his latest application, the Board denied his promotion and the awards it had previously granted, which was an unjust action by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012113

    Original file (20090012113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and that his DD Form 214 ((Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected accordingly. He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005039C070205

    Original file (20060005039C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart and that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 31 January 1973 be corrected to reflect all of his awards and his foreign service. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart for that wound; however, he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for that action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020969

    Original file (20090020969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the AGCM for the period of 6 June 1963 to 3 June 1965 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st award) for the period of...