Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020969
Original file (20090020969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  15 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020969 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states that he served in Korea near the demilitarized zone (DMZ) in support of the Vietnam War with the 1st Target Acquisition Battery,
25th Artillery Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division and he believes he is entitled to award of the NDSM, VSM, and the AGCM.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to 
timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army in Atlanta, GA on 4 June 1963.  He completed his basic combat training at Fort Gordon, GA and his advanced individual training (AIT) in military occupational specialty 154.10 (flash ranging crewman) at Fort Sill, OK.

3.  Upon completion of his training he was transferred to Korea on 23 October 1963 for assignment to C Battery, 1st Target Acquisition Battery, 25th Artillery Battalion.  In November 1963, his entire unit received a letter of appreciation from the Division Artillery commander.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 10 November 1964.

4.  He departed Korea on 5 December 1964 and he was transferred to Fort Bragg, NC, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 3 June 1965, due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years of total active service.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows a letter of appreciation as his only award.

5.  A review of the applicant’s DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar in July 1963.  This form also shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between
27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  Qualifying service also included temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or
60 nonconsecutive days in Vietnam or contiguous areas, except that the time limit may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea.  The period of eligibility is 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the NDSM has been noted and found to have merit.  The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the AGCM has also been noted and found to have merit. Although there is no automatic entitlement for award of the AGCM, the applicant had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records contain no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.  Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that the failure to award him the AGCM was the result of an administrative error.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the AGCM for the period of 6 June 1963 to 3 June 1965 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the VSM for his service in Korea has been noted and appears to lack merit.  Service in Korea was not in support of the war in Vietnam as defined under the applicable regulations.  Additionally, the period of eligibility for the VSM extended from 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973, which is after the applicant's REFRAD.  Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the VSM.

4.  However, the applicant qualified for award of the KDSM by virtue of his service in Korea.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

5.  Additionally, his records show that he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  Accordingly, this qualification badge should be added to his DD Form 214 at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X___  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  awarding him the AGCM (1st award) for the period of 6 June 1963 to
3 June 1965, and

   b.  adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 the AGCM (1st award), NDSM, KDSM, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the VSM.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020969



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020969



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002656

    Original file (20120002656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 should be corrected to show this award. Although he is authorized to wear only one award, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 should be corrected to show two awards of this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007312

    Original file (20130007312.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in: * Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions), he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 effective 9 October 1965 * Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) – * where recorded, he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings * on 16 September 1965, he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with Company A, 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division * Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States), he departed the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021057

    Original file (20140021057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he received the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal (VCM) and any other awards he may have earned. Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the: * Republic of Korea from 17 July 1964 to 28 July 1965 * RVN from 20 October 1966 through 9 February 1967 4. c. Adding to his DD Form 214 the: * AGCM (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008409

    Original file (20120008409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains four DD Forms 214. a. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (3rd Award) for this period and to correct his final DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 83d Ordnance Battalion (Ammunition), General Orders Number 3, dated 7 March 1963, to show the period for the AGCM (2nd Award) as "28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010932C070206

    Original file (20050010932C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Only one of the awards could be awarded. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 9 September 1963 to 23 August 1965, the VSM with one bronze service star, the NDSM, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014324

    Original file (20140014324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140014324 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 23 August 1966 to 22 August 1968 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 23 August 1966 to 22 August 1968; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005295

    Original file (20140005295.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no adverse actions recorded in the applicant's available records or any record of a disqualification by his chain of command that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the AGCM. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017606

    Original file (20100017606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect the following awards for his foreign service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and in the Republic of Korea (ROK): * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (First Award) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Korean Defense Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014318

    Original file (20140014318 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the awards of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge). The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM and that award should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000161

    Original file (20150000161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows: a. DAGOs awarded the applicant's unit the – * Valorous Unit Award * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (3rd Award) * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation b. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...