Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004621
Original file (20140004621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  23 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004621 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show foreign service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states his service in Vietnam was not added to his DD Form 214.  He took cryptographic equipment to Vietnam and was there long enough to collect combat pay.  His pay records will confirm he was in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 
15 September 1965.  He held military occupational specialty 71H (Personnel Specialist) and attained the rank/grade of specialist five/E-5.

3.  His military records do not contain and he has not provided his pay records.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he attended basic combat and advanced individual training at Fort Dix, NJ, between 21 September 1965 and 23 February 1966, when he was placed in a casual status enroute to Hawaii (HI).  He was assigned to the U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC) in Hawaii, from 4 March 1966 to 9 September 1967.  During the period of this assignment, he served with Headquarters and Service Company, as the company clerk from 4 March 1966 to until 9 September 1967, when he was placed in a casual status enroute to Oakland, CA.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 9 September 1967.  His 
DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, 25 days of net active service, of which 1 year, 6 months, and 5 days were credited as foreign service. His DD Form 214 does not contain any entries referring to Vietnam service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he served in Vietnam has been carefully considered and researched.

2.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any corroborating or supporting official record or documentation placing him in Vietnam.

3.  In view of the forgoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the requested relief.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004621





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004621



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020186

    Original file (20100020186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his service in Vietnam with the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, the unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, for service from 6 to 23 November 1967 based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 5, dated 1979; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000154

    Original file (20120000154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 shows he served in the U.S. Army Pacific (Japan) from 1 August 1966 to 28 September 1967. Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that item 18f shows the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater service was performed, e.g., USAREUR (U.S. Army Europe). The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016980

    Original file (20120016980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record contains no permanent change of station orders, TDY orders, or any other official documents that shows he was ordered to or served in Vietnam from September to December 1966. Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that item 18f shows the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027114

    Original file (20100027114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. The article said this was his second tour of duty in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows he was on TCS orders to deploy with his unit on 14 February 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013032

    Original file (20070013032.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 8 (Place of Birth) and Item 30 (Remarks) of his 13 February 1970 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The majority of documents on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contains a place of birth list Litchfield, Illinois, as the applicant's birthplace.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022907

    Original file (20110022907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show time served in Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to add the entry, Vietnam and inclusive dates, to Item 30 of his DD Form 214. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019804

    Original file (20140019804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). These corrections, however, were already completed, as shown in a DD Form 215 dated 18 September 2014. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 June 1968 to show the following: * his rank/grade as SSG/E-6 * a separate entry showing attendance at the U.S. Army NCO Academy * an entry showing completion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018103

    Original file (20100018103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show two Overseas Service Bars for his service in Vietnam and Hawaii is acknowledged. However, Army Regulation 670-1 does not show the Overseas Service Bar was authorized for service in Hawaii. ________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029778

    Original file (20100029778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service medals and awards are not issued by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The citations states: Staff Sergeant [Applicant] distinguished himself by heroic actions on 26 November 1967, while serving as platoon sergeant for Company A, 2nd Battalion, 27th Infantry on a search and destroy operation in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015481

    Original file (20140015481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his DD Form 214 should have an MOS of 13F since he served in that MOS during his entire 12 months of service in Vietnam. There is no evidence to show he held MOS 13F at the time of his separation.