Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003985
Original file (20140003985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003985 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show any awards and decorations to which he is entitled for his foreign service in Thailand.

2.  The applicant states he did not receive a ribbon for his service in Thailand and Southeast Asia.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 November 1965 and held military occupational specialty 82B (Construction Surveyor).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist five/E-5.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to the U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC) in Thailand, from 18 January 1967 to 20 January 1968, where he served with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 538th Engineer Battalion.  There is no indication in the available record that shows this unit served in direct support of operations in Vietnam.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 25 November 1968.  His 
DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of net active service, of which 1 year and 2 days were credited as foreign service with USARPAC.  His DD Form 214 further shows he was authorized the National Defense Service Medal.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  

   a.  Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Vietnam, and the contiguous waters or airspace there over, after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspace there over, during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam were also eligible for this award.

	b.  Paragraph 9-13 contains guidance on awarding the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, which was authorized for members who served in the Republic of Vietnam for 6 months or more during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  It was also authorized for those who served outside of the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces for 6 months.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms the applicant's foreign service was performed in Thailand; however, his record does not contain and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show he served in direct support of operations or contributed to direct combat support in Vietnam.  As such, there is insufficient evidence to grant him any additional awards or decorations.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003985





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003985



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017320

    Original file (20100017320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 21, issued by Headquarters, 40th Military Police Battalion, dated 23 October 1967, awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award); therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Absent such evidence, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013751

    Original file (20110013751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Accordingly, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010464

    Original file (20120010464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Patch [Shoulder Sleeve Insignia] 2. The applicant states: * his DD Form 214 shows his tour of duty in Thailand during the Vietnam War * based upon Army Regulations, he is entitled to the awards and combat patch 3. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010344

    Original file (20110010344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the following: a. the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) was established on 4 December 1961 and may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who after 1 July 1958: (1) participate, or have participated, as members of U.S. military units in a U.S. military operation in which service members of any Military Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011997

    Original file (20090011997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served with the 538th Engineer Battalion in Thailand from mid-1965 to mid-1966. On 17 July 1968, Headquarters, United States Army Support, Thailand directed all personnel serving in Thailand be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and Vietnam Campaign Medal. The available evidence shows that the applicant served in Thailand with the 538th Engineer Battalion in support of military operations in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528

    Original file (20120006528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027669

    Original file (20100027669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Notwithstanding the letter from NPRC, the evidence of record failed to show his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05372

    Original file (BC-2012-05372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05372 COUNSEL: NONE ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record they were unable to verify award of the RVCM and the VSM. The applicant’s claimed dates of service in Thailand are after the award inclusive period for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010481

    Original file (20100010481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspace there over during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. In the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he arrived in and departed from Vietnam, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the Vietnam...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05812

    Original file (BC-2012-05812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on their review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine that the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) should have been awarded during the applicant's service from 7 June 1965 to 31 October 1985 and was not reflected in his records. The complete AFPC/DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...