Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003713
Original file (20140003713.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003713 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be granted an exception to policy to receive basic allowance for housing (BAH) for his dependents located in Elk Grove, California instead of Fort Huachuca, Arizona.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his wife’s enrollment in the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP) was not considered when he was assigned to Fort Huachuca.  He attempted to get his assignment changed because he was advised there was no medical care for his spouse at Fort Huachuca and the EFMP coordinator at Fort Huachuca advised him he should not bring his wife to Fort Huachuca.  He applied for a BAH waiver that was denied by the U.S. Amy Human Resources Command (HRC).  He was advised to apply for a compassionate reassignment; however, by that time he had less than 8 months of service left before he was due to separate due to expiration of his term of service.

3.  The applicant provides copies of email messages relating to his request for a BAH waiver, his wife’s enrollment in the EFMP, permanent change of station (PCS) and separation orders, Enlisted Record Brief, and copies of documents from his wife’s medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 August 2006.  

2.  He deployed to Iraq during the period 20071128 – 20090215.    
3.  He was transferred to Fort Irwin, California.  He deployed to Afghanistan during the period 20100428 – 20110430.

4.  He was transferred to Camp Humphrey, Korea on 21 August 2012.

5.  PCS orders were published on 18 April 2013, which transferred him to Fort Huachuca effective 10 October 2013.

6.  The documents he provides indicate he began the process of enrolling his spouse into the EFMP in August 2013.

7.  The EFMP Coordinator at Fort Huachuca signed a memorandum on             19 September 2013, indicating there was no specialized medical care for his spouse available in the Fort Huachuca area.

8.  He submitted a request for a BAH exception to policy on 23 September 2013, and it was supported by his battalion commander.

9.  Officials at HRC dispatched an email to the applicant on 7 January 2014, informing him that his request for a BAH waiver was denied and advised him to request a compassionate reassignment through the Special Actions Branch at HRC.
 
10.  He submitted his application to this Board on 19 February 2014.  On 6 July 2014, he was honorably discharged at Fort Huachuca due to completion of required service.  He served 7 years, 9 months, and 23 days of active service.  

11.  All Army Activities (ALARACT) Message 324/2012 date time group 141232Z November 2012, Subject: Exception to Policy Guidance for Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) Waivers provides implementation guidance for all Soldiers who desire to receive BAH at other that the permanent duty station location when circumstances require the dependents to reside separately.  It provides, in pertinent part (paragraph 4), that a Soldier may be considered for a Secretarial BAH waiver for enrollment in the EFMP or medical considerations.  Soldiers who have dependents with exceptional needs or medical considerations that warrant leaving them at the previous duty station location temporarily due to continuity of care or service that cannot readily be provided may be considered.  A letter from the gaining station’s EFMP coordinator is required.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should have been granted a BAH waiver allowing him to receive BAH for California instead of Fort Huachuca has been noted and appears to have merit.

2.  While it appears that his situation has been overcome by his discharge, it appears the applicant did not enroll his spouse in the EFMP until after he had received assignment instructions, which would account for why enrollment in the EFMP was not considered when his assignment was made.  However, it also appears that the timing of his enrollment of his spouse in the EFMP was based on when she was diagnosed and was not within his control.

3.  The evidence of record shows he was serving an unaccompanied tour in Korea when his spouse was diagnosed and he was tasked with trying to deal with his problem through long-distance.  It also appears he did everything required of him to resolve the situation. 

4.  In any event, the denial of his BAH waiver resulted in his having to bear the extra expense associated with his family remaining in California so his spouse could receive medical care that was not available at his new duty station.

5.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he was granted a BAH waiver for his family to remain in Elk Grove, California effective the date he reported to Fort Huachuca, Arizona. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was granted a BAH Waiver for his family to remain in Elk Grove, California effective the date he reported to Fort Huachuca, Arizona until his discharge on 6 July 2014, with entitlement to all back pay that flows from this action. 

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _____________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003713





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003713



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020924

    Original file (20110020924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 1-6 states the EFMP allows AHRC to consider the special education and medical needs of exceptional family members during the assignment process and reassigns Soldiers, when readiness does not require a specific reassignment, to an area where the family member's needs can be accommodated. The evidence shows the applicant complied with his assignment instructions and reported to Fort Huachuca as directed; however, he left his family in Hawaii due to his wife's enrollment in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008379

    Original file (20130008379.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. The applicant's request was also for the dependents to complete state testing, which was through 13 May 2011, with the end of the school year date of 10 June 2011, not 5 July 2011. h. He cannot make clear enough that though the advisory opinion states the program has been in the JFTR since 2005 and he was finally able to see the ALARACT message in the August/September 2011 time frame, he has executed five PCSs since 2005 and he has never been apprised of the availability of the program. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020933

    Original file (20130020933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his marriage license * Orders 213-50, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Monroe, VA, dated 1 August 2011 * a copy of his wife's teaching contract with New Beginnings Charter School, Bedford – Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, New York, dated 15 August 2012 * Orders 271-1008, Installation Management Command (IMCOM) – Pacific Region, Military Personnel Division, Republic of Korea on 27 September 2012 * a lease agreement for a residence in Queens, NY * a memorandum for record (MFR), signed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014182

    Original file (20120014182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On or about 8 August 2012, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informed this Board that it was unable to implement paragraph 1b of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION in Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20110020924 dated 12 July 2012. That paragraph requested DFAS to do a complete audit of the applicant’s Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) and pay him all due temporary duty (TDY) travel entitlements. BOARD VOTE: ___X ___ ___X____ ___X...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024967

    Original file (20110024967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was granted a secretarial waiver to receive basic allowance for housing (BAH) based on his dependent's location, Korea, instead of his duty station, Fort Irwin, CA. The applicant provides: * a copy of his permanent change of station (PCS) orders to Camp Casey, Korea with a report date of 30 July 2008 * a copy of his PCS orders to Weed Army Community Hospital, Warrior Transition Unit (WTU), Fort Irwin, CA with a report date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009768

    Original file (20130009768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * self-authored memoranda, subject: [Applicant], Request for BAH Waiver to Retain BAH at Current Duty Location, dated 20 March 2013 and 10 April 2013 * e-mail correspondence * BAH waiver request template * document entitled Instructions to Obtain a BAH Waiver for PCS * ALARACT 021/2008 * ALARACT 324/2012 * letter, dated 11 March 2013, regarding his son's standing as a student * Officer Record Brief (ORB) * orders * Military Leave and Earnings Statement CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076779C070215

    Original file (2002076779C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the obligated period of service, the soldier will not apply for voluntary nondisability retirement unless the soldier is (a) eligible for retirement by completion 30 years or more active Federal service and (b) already eligible through prior service for a higher grade at retirement and (c) over 58 years of age. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002766

    Original file (0002766.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 9 December 1998 he received a PCS to XXXX AFB, XXX. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. Although the applicant was reassigned to XXXX AFB, he chose not to relocate his family because of inadequate health care for his son.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017537C071113

    Original file (20060017537C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was instructed by Aviation Branch, HRC-Alexandria, that he would be authorized to move his dependents and HHG to his HOR during his deployment and that he would receive BAH for the HOR location. There is no evidence the applicant ever contacted the Transportation Office at Fort Huachuca or Fort Hood. When ordered on a PCS, the member is only allowed to move his dependents at Government expense to the new PCS location.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000170

    Original file (20070000170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was given orders to PCS to Fort Hood with a report date of 15 September 2006, and a deployment date of 23 October 2006. Given the applicant moved his family members in good faith based on the information contained in his PCS orders, this DA official recommends the Army Board of Corrections to Military Records (ABCMR) grant authorization to the applicant for the following: movement of dependents at Government expense (including authority for...