RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 April 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000170
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz
Acting Director
Ms. Yvonne Foskey
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Mr. John Infante
Chairperson
Ms. Susan A. Powers
Member
Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of his permanent change of station (PCS) orders to show he was authorized movement of his dependents and household goods (HHG) to his home of record (HOR) vice Fort Hood, Texas, and then on to his next permanent duty station (PDS) after his deployment. He further requests receipt of basic allowance for housing (BAH) at the rate specified for his HOR location.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was given orders to PCS to Fort Hood with a report date of 15 September 2006, and a deployment date of 23 October 2006. He states that his orders authorized him to leave his family members at his previous duty station. However, with no other means to provide for his family while he was deployed, he moved them to his HOR. He also states that due to the short time-line in standing for his PCS to Fort Hood and the need to ensure his family was properly cared for prior to his deployment, he moved his family at his own expense resulting in a considerable cost to himself. He now requests that his PCS orders be amended to authorize movement of his dependents to his HOR and then PCS to his next PDS after his deployment.
3. The applicant provides United States Army Intelligence Center and
Fort Huachuca, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, Orders Number 269-0023, dated
26 September 2006, in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty 12 June 1997, and that he has continuously served on active duty through the present date. At the time of his application to the Board, he was serving in Iraq, in the rank of sergeant (SGT).
2. United States Army Intelligence Center and Fort Huachuca, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, Orders Number 269-00023, dated 26 September 2006, directed the applicant's PCS to Fort Hood, Texas with a reporting date of 10 October 2006. The Additional Instructions portion of the orders contains special instructions that state, in effect, that the applicant was authorized to either retain Government quarters or to relocate his family members to a designated location in the CONUS.
3. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Department of the Army (DA), Chief, Compensation & Entitlements Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1. This official stated that the governing regulation provides no authority to move dependents to a CONUS HOR or designated location at Government expense when the Soldier is on PCS orders to a CONUS location (Fort Hood, Texas) because there are no CONUS unaccompanied tours. However, this official determined that through no fault of the applicant, he was incorrectly led to believe by a statement in his PCS orders that he would be, at some time in the future, reimbursed for expenses he incurred for moving his dependents at personnel expense to his HOR. Given the applicant moved his family members in good faith based on the information contained in his PCS orders, this DA official recommends the Army Board of Corrections to Military Records (ABCMR) grant authorization to the applicant for the following: movement of dependents at Government expense (including authority for reimbursement of costs incurred by the applicant to pay for a move he already conducted at personnel expense not to exceed the Government's constructed cost for this move form his permanent duty station (PDS) of
Fort Hood, Texas to his HOR; subsequent authorization after completion of his deployment for a move at Government expense from his HOR either back to his PDS or to his next PDS whichever is appropriate; and drawing BAH based on his HOR during his deployment.
4. On 8 February 2007, the applicant was provided a copy of the DA advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to respond. To date, he has failed to reply.
5. Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), paragraph U5222-C, stipulates, in pertinent part, that a member, ordered to make a PCS with temporary duty (TDY) en route, or while on TDY is ordered to make a PCS without return to the old PDS, is authorized HHG transportation to the new PDS. It also allows movement of dependents at Government expense to a CONUS (continental U.S.) location when a member is ordered to serve on an overseas unaccompanied tour. When ordered on a PCS, the member is only allowed to move his dependents at Government expense to the new PCS location.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was reassigned to Fort Hood, Texas, with a reporting date in September 2006 for a scheduled deployment to Iraq in October 2006. The PCS orders issued to him confirm his assignment to Fort Hood with no reference to his scheduled deployment to Iraq.
2. The PCS orders issued to the applicant do contain special instructions that indicate he was authorized to either retain Government quarters, or to ship his family members to a designated location in CONUS. As a result, the applicant acting on the authorization contained in his orders and moved his family to his HOR.
3. Notwithstanding the pertinent regulations, it would be inequitable to deny the applicant an exception to policy to move his family to his HOR, to receive BAH for that location, and for authorization for movement of his family members subsequent to his deployment. Therefore, it would be appropriate to grant the relief recommended in the DA G-1 advisory opinion.
BOARD VOTE:
___JI ___ __SAP__ __QAS __ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was authorized movement of dependents at Government expense (including authority for reimbursement of costs incurred by the applicant to pay for a move he already conducted at personnel expense not to exceed the Government's constructed cost for this move form his permanent duty station (PDS) of Fort Hood, Texas to his home of record; by showing that at the completion of his deployment, he is authorized a move at Government expense from his home of record either back to his permanent duty station or to his next permanent duty station, whichever is appropriate; and by authorizing him to receive basic allowance for housing based on his home of record during the period of his deployment.
_____John Infante________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20070000170
SUFFIX
RECON
N/A
DATE BOARDED
2007/04/03
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
N/A
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Mr. Schwartz
ISSUES 1.
100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017537C071113
The applicant was instructed by Aviation Branch, HRC-Alexandria, that he would be authorized to move his dependents and HHG to his HOR during his deployment and that he would receive BAH for the HOR location. There is no evidence the applicant ever contacted the Transportation Office at Fort Huachuca or Fort Hood. When ordered on a PCS, the member is only allowed to move his dependents at Government expense to the new PCS location.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015396
The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his permanent change of station (PCS) Orders L216-003 to show authorization to move his family to Crescent Springs, Kentucky, and to authorize reimbursement of expenses for storage of household goods at that same location. Based on his discussion with other members of the task force, and knowing that he would not be assigned to Fort Hood, Texas, upon his redeployment, he decided to move his family and a portion of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009768
He provides: * self-authored memoranda, subject: [Applicant], Request for BAH Waiver to Retain BAH at Current Duty Location, dated 20 March 2013 and 10 April 2013 * e-mail correspondence * BAH waiver request template * document entitled Instructions to Obtain a BAH Waiver for PCS * ALARACT 021/2008 * ALARACT 324/2012 * letter, dated 11 March 2013, regarding his son's standing as a student * Officer Record Brief (ORB) * orders * Military Leave and Earnings Statement CONSIDERATION OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003879
The applicant states, in effect: * he received a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informing him of a $13,317.70 debt as a result of overpayment of BAH from 1 March 2004 to 30 January 2005 * DFAS assumed that he was not entitled to BAH at all when in fact he was deployed to Iraq during this period * During this period, he was paid BAH at the O-3 rate, with dependents, at zip code 27520, at $1,211.00 per month; this was the proper amount * his records were updated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016844
On 7 August 2009, the LAARNG denied her request to amend her PCS orders to show a no cost/low cost move. By her own admission, she did submit a claim for mileage cost for one trip between her old and new duty locations as authorized by her PCS orders and she rented an apartment in Carville until her deployment to Iraq in July 2007, indicating she did not continue to routinely commute from her residence in New Orleans to her new duty location. That she did not use her full PCS entitlement...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020933
The applicant provides: * his marriage license * Orders 213-50, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Monroe, VA, dated 1 August 2011 * a copy of his wife's teaching contract with New Beginnings Charter School, Bedford Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, New York, dated 15 August 2012 * Orders 271-1008, Installation Management Command (IMCOM) Pacific Region, Military Personnel Division, Republic of Korea on 27 September 2012 * a lease agreement for a residence in Queens, NY * a memorandum for record (MFR), signed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023040
Orders Number 057-10, dated 26 February 2010, shows the following: a. the applicant was ordered to PCS from a USAREC unit in Wheat Ridge, CO to a USAREC unit in Texarkana, TX. Records show the applicant was part of an Army Regulation 15-6 investigation which concluded in August 2010. PCS orders provided by the applicant show he was assigned to Wheat Ridge, CO, and he subsequently received orders to Texarkana, TX, with a reporting date of 10 August 2010.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017808
Even though he was selected for separation by the SERB, he should have received a new or amended permanent change of station (PCS) order with a different movement designator code (MDC) and authorization for DLA returning him stateside from his assignment in Moscow, Russia in order to properly transition and retire since there were no ACAP services available. A member on active duty is authorized travel and transportation allowances to a home selected by the member from the last PDS when the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015179
The JFTR states that when Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers are ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH rate is based on the primary residence location at the time the Soldier was ordered to active duty. However, if the member is called or ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH/OHA rate is based (paid) on the primary residence location at the time called/ordered to active duty"; and c. there is no distinction made in the PPG or JFTR for AGR BAH when the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100094C070208
Army officers attending the AWC received BAH based on their new duty location regardless of where their families resided. The applicant states that informal discussions with the Army action officers indicated that the Army was unwilling to change its policy in the students' favor without a statutory change to Title 37, U. S. Code, regardless of the other Services' BAH policies. The advisory opinion went on to note that the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense published a policy on 26...