Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014182
Original file (20120014182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  11 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120014182 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:

25.  On or about 8 August 2012, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informed this Board that it was unable to implement paragraph 1b of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION in Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20110020924 dated 12 July 2012.  That paragraph requested DFAS to do a complete audit of the applicantÂ’s Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) and pay him all due temporary duty (TDY) travel entitlements.  DFAS stated TDY is a travel function and their office does not have access to local travel files.  His local Defense Military Pay Office (DMPO) is able to perform a complete audit of records and to pay him full compensation, and the applicant should provide his local DMPO with copies of all orders, a DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), and all receipts.  

26.  The G-1, Military Personnel Branch, Installation Management Command - Pacific Region implemented paragraph 1a of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION by preparing Order CI-220-017, dated 7 August 2012.  This order amended his Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Order CI-032-033, dated 1 February 2010, to add Additional Instructions:  

	(ab)  Soldier was in a temporary duty (TDY) status during the period 10 March through 12 May 2010; 

	(ac)  Your request for a policy waiver to receive basic allowance for housing (BAH) and cost of living allowance (COLA) based on your previous duty station 


(Schofield Barracks, HI  96857) while assigned to Fort Huachuca, AZ  85613 is approved while your dependents remain at their location; and

	(ad)  Your request meets the guidelines for a policy BAH and COLA at the without dependent rate on your previous duty station while assigned to Fort Huachuca, AZ.  This waiver is granted based on the enrollment of your dependent in the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP) and the necessity to continue care for treatment of your spouse's medical condition.  

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

11.  At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20110020924 dated 12 July 2012 it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicantÂ’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at that time.

12.  The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20110020924 erroneously requested DFAS to audit his MMPA and to pay him.  Therefore, item 1b of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION should be amended to direct the applicant to take a copy of his original PCS order, Order CI-220-017 dated    7 August 2012, a DD Form 1351-2, and all receipts to his local DMPO to compute his travel entitlements in light of the amended PCS orders.

BOARD VOTE:

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records set forth in Docket Number AR20110020924, dated 12 July 2012 by amending paragraph 1b  of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION to read:  


"having his local DMPO compute his travel entitlements in light of the amended PCS orders and pay him all due TDY entitlements minus any previously-paid PCS entitlements for this period"; and




      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120014182





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Supplemental Record of Proceedings (cont)                 AR20120014182



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020924

    Original file (20110020924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 1-6 states the EFMP allows AHRC to consider the special education and medical needs of exceptional family members during the assignment process and reassigns Soldiers, when readiness does not require a specific reassignment, to an area where the family member's needs can be accommodated. The evidence shows the applicant complied with his assignment instructions and reported to Fort Huachuca as directed; however, he left his family in Hawaii due to his wife's enrollment in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004856

    Original file (20120004856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * memorandum requesting sponsorship, dated 14 March 2007 * Orders 191-12, dated 9 July 2008 * Carlson Wagonlit travel itinerary/invoice, dated 29 July 2008 * DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 August 2008 * DA Form 5960, dated 11 August 2008 * DD Form 2367, dated 11 August 2008 * Orders 301-02, dated 27 October 2008 * letter from the Darton College Office of the Registrar, dated 5 October 2010 * Account summary from Midland Mortgage Company, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001721

    Original file (20140001721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The investigating officer (IO) alleged the applicant had not moved to Richmond, as she had stated on her travel vouchers and statements; thereby, she fraudulently claimed expenses and reimbursement as if she had completed the move, then received BAH for Richmond when not entitled to that allowance. d. There is sufficient evidence to support a number of specific findings that she: (1) never moved to Richmond; (2) falsified her DD Form 1351-2 for her claimed PCS move to Richmond; (3) claimed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014992

    Original file (20140014992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    HRC Orders R-02-081755, dated 22 February 2010, ordered her to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status and assigned her to Company B, 399th Support Hospital, Taunton, MA, with a reporting date of 1 June 2010 under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12301(d). The applicant provided: a. a Days Inn hotel receipt, dated 26 September 2012, that shows her lodging for the period 24 through 26 September 2012; b. a travel query that shows her travels during the period 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009793

    Original file (20130009793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had DFAS processed his request, he would not have the debt. The form shows he requested to stop BAQ and that he had been assigned to government quarters. To determine injustice the application must contain evidence that the applicant did not know and could not have known of the error and/or the applicant inquired of a proper authority and was told the payment was correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014370

    Original file (20130014370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * when he turned in his PPM paperwork, he did not turn in the empty weight ticket for one of the two trucks he used to complete his PPM * he had the appropriate weight tickets for the truck he rented to move his professional gear, but not for the truck he rented as his main moving truck, which he used to move his HHG * neither he nor the transportation official who reviewed his case prior to submission realized the error * instead of calling and requesting the empty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018503

    Original file (20130018503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    p. A DA Form 1559 (IG Action Request), dated 22 April 2008, the applicant submitted for an investigation into why his original orders were for PCS and not TDY for his 179 days and why it was not amended in time and payment for his 10 days AT in January 2008. q. The evidence of record shows the applicant, while already on orders for 98 days, was issued ADT PCS orders for 179 days. Therefore, he is not entitled to amendment of his PCS orders.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014144

    Original file (20120014144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finance instructed me to submit the request and if I was not entitled to receive FSA, Finance would not authorize funding. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for full remission or cancellation of a debt in the amount of $28,554.80. The available records show the applicant received erroneous payments of FSA, COLA, HDP, and BAH.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006637

    Original file (20150006637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reimbursement for his personally procured move (PPM) move from Fort Huachuca, AZ, to Fort Campbell, KY. 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving at Fort Huachuca when he was issued PCS orders in December 2014 reassigning him to Fort Campbell. On 19 December 2014, he was properly counseled at Fort Huachuca on the PPM program to include his entitlements, his responsibilities, and the documentation required to submit a claim for a PPM move.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017537C071113

    Original file (20060017537C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was instructed by Aviation Branch, HRC-Alexandria, that he would be authorized to move his dependents and HHG to his HOR during his deployment and that he would receive BAH for the HOR location. There is no evidence the applicant ever contacted the Transportation Office at Fort Huachuca or Fort Hood. When ordered on a PCS, the member is only allowed to move his dependents at Government expense to the new PCS location.