Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003091
Original file (20140003091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003091 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

2.  The applicant states the Combat Infantryman Badge was pinned on him by a major, his battalion executive officer, on 12 February 1970.  He was discharged before the paperwork entered his military records.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 1967 and held military occupational specialty 11F (Infantry Operations and Intelligence Specialist).

3.  He completed infantry officer candidate school and he was honorably discharged on 27 March 1968 for the purpose of accepting a commission.  He was issued a DD Form 214 that captured this period of enlisted service. 

4.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army and executed an oath of office on 28 March 1968.  He entered active duty on the same date.

5.  He served in Europe from 10 June 1968 to 8 June 1969.  He also served in Vietnam from 25 July 1969 to 19 February 1970.  He was assigned as an executive officer to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry, 101st Airborne Division. 

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 23 February 1970.  His  DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal

7.  There are no special orders that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

8.  His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

9.  His Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for the rating period 26 September 1969 to 17 February 1970 shows his principal duty as "executive officer conducting internal defense operations in the Republic of Vietnam."  The OER does not mention the applicant actively participated in ground combat while his infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy. 

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.  It states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

2.  The applicant does not provide the orders that awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge.  Likewise, his service records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

3.  His sincerity and service in Vietnam in an infantry specialty and unit are not in question.  However, there is insufficient evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.

4.  In the absence of the orders or additional documentary evidence that specifically places him under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X ____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON


I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.




ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003091





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003091



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005611

    Original file (20130005611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010410

    Original file (20130010410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the Combat Infantryman Badge should be added to his records. His citation for the award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device clearly shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving as a machine gunner in an infantry company actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 with an effective date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007774

    Original file (20080007774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was assigned MOS 11B and he was assigned to an infantry company while in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's military personnel records show he participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009693

    Original file (20080009693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1968 for a period of 3 years. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H. In the absence of evidence, which shows the applicant was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002381

    Original file (20150002381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. However, there is insufficient evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while performing infantry duties in an infantry unit while the unit was actively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022469

    Original file (20110022469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The certificates and citations provided by the applicant show that his awards were for meritorious service and there is no evidence in his records to show his encounters with the enemy. Although it is likely that he did encounter the enemy given he was a scout dog handler, not every infantryman in Vietnam had encounters with the enemy or were awarded the CIB simply for being an infantryman and being in country.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003287

    Original file (20150003287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and he was assigned to an armored cavalry squadron in the Republic of Vietnam. Evidence further shows his unit engaged with the enemy in battle on 30 April 1969, during a period the applicant was assigned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016692

    Original file (20140016692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) for his Guard service shows in Item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties) MOS 11B. However, he was informed by the battalion commander that he was assigned to the unit for service in his secondary MOS 11B. However, MAJ MJM does not indicate why he, as his platoon leader, did not recommend the applicant for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge at the time prior to his departure from Company E. 5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000730

    Original file (20090000730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. Records show that the applicant participated in two campaign periods during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of hostile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002910

    Original file (20140002910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although wear of multiple awards of this unit citation is not authorized, official military personnel and historical records will indicate all awards received. While he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry, the unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award which was awarded for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy of the United States while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force. As a result, the Board recommends that all...