Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003287
Original file (20150003287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 October 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150003287 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

2.  The applicant states he had different assignments while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; however, he did perform duty as an 11B (Light Weapons Infantry Crewman).

3.  The applicant provides:

* 2 letters
* page 99 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards)
* page 3 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Personnel Record)
* 14 pages of DA Form 1594 (Daily Staff Journal or Duty Officer's Log)
* a list of names 
* a list of Vietnam Casualty Codes

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on                    3 September 1968.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B.  

3.  Evidence shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam for the period             29 January 1968 through 27 January 1970.  He served with Troop E, 2nd Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment for the period 1 February to 30 July 1969 and with Company C, 52nd Infantry, 716th Military Police Battalion for the period 31 July 1969 to 26 January 1970.

4.  Item 38 of his DA Form 20 also shows he served as a Rifleman in MOS      11B effective 25 March through 30 July 1969, with Troop E, 2nd Squadron,      11th Armored Cavalry Regiment.

5.  On 8 June 1970, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He completed          1 year, 9 months, and 6 days of total active service during this period.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* First Class Gunner Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M60)
 
6.  The applicant provides a 14-page DA Form 1594, in reference to the 11th Cavalry Regiment, dated 30 April 1969, that shows his unit was engaged with the enemy in battle which resulted in the loss of life.  The applicant's name is not mentioned in this document.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and he was assigned to an armored cavalry squadron in the Republic of Vietnam.  Evidence further shows his unit engaged with the enemy in battle on 30 April 1969, during a period the applicant was assigned.  However, he provides insufficient evidence which shows he was personally present and actively engaged in combat with the enemy during the period in question.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003287





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003287



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010200

    Original file (20120010200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided the following documents: a. letter, dated 11 March 2012, from a former Senior Medic for Troop G, 2nd Squadron, 11th ACR, who states the applicant left Blackhorse base camp with Troop G on or about 26 May 1969. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded a medical personnel MOS and he served as an ambulance orderly and medical aidman with the 37th Medical Company and Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 2nd Squadron, 11th ACR in Vietnam. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002029

    Original file (20140002029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows his unit was awarded the PUC; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the CIB and correct his DD Form 214 to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 19 May 1969 through 14 October 1970 * deleting award of the VSM from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016189C080407

    Original file (20070016189C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit, but also that he was personally present and participated with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces. Therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002378

    Original file (20090002378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was also awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for heroism in connection with ground operations against a hostile force on 12 August 1969 while serving as a mechanic with Troop G, 3rd Squadron, 11th ACR, in the Republic of Vietnam. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019906

    Original file (20110019906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service records do not contain official orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. An undated statement from a unit member who was wounded in combat in Vietnam while assigned to the same unit, who states that the unit was involved in combat in Vietnam and that the applicant was a part of the involvement. There are three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge: the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012880C080213

    Original file (20070012880C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 January 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070012880 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to amend his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013980

    Original file (20140013980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he wrote to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Awards and Decorations Branch to request a replacement Combat Infantryman Badge * HRC removed the Combat Infantryman Badge from his DD Form 214 claiming he was not entitled to the award because he did not have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) * HRC must not be aware that U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), appendix V, stated MOS 11D (Armor Intelligence Specialist) was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004019

    Original file (20090004019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 June 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004019 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Combat service alone did not support award of the CIB. The evidence of record in this case confirms that although the applicant served in a qualifying unit while serving in the RVN, he did not hold and serve in an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019065

    Original file (20100019065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was an infantryman serving in MOS 11C, he was assigned to an infantry unit, and he provided a weapons data card that shows he fired HE rounds during an enemy attack on 3 February 1971. Therefore, based on the evidence he provided to the Board, the applicant should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and his discharge document should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006125

    Original file (20060006125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the Board does not doubt the veracity of the applicant’s claim that he should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, there is no evidence in the available records which conclusively shows that he was personally present and under hostile fire while his unit was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...