Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002381
Original file (20150002381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  29 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150002381 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states that he served as an Infantry officer in the 1st Infantry Division, 35th Infantry Platoon from 14 June 1969 to 13 June 1970.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 February 1966 and served until he was honorably discharged on 
5 November 1968, in the rank of sergeant/E-5, for the purpose of accepting a commission.  He was issued a DD Form 214 that captured this period of enlisted service.

3.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army and executed an oath of office on 6 November 1968.  He entered active duty on the same date.  His specialty was 1542 (Infantry Unit Commander).

4.  He served in Vietnam from 14 June 1969 to 13 June 1970 while assigned to the 35th Infantry Platoon (Scout Dog), 1st Infantry Division and performed the duties of a platoon leader and assistant platoon leader.  He was honorably released from active duty on 5 November 1970.

5.  There are no special orders that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

6.  His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

7.  His DA Forms 67-6 (U.S. Army Officer Efficiency Report) for the period 7 May 1969 through 8 June 1970 shows in addition to handling the duties of a scout dog platoon leader, he performed managerial and administrative duties.  “A requirement for the utilization of tracker dogs never arose,” but he was able to respond rapidly and effectively.  There is no mention of any active participation in ground combat with the enemy.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.  It states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.
2.  The applicant does not provide the orders that awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge.  Likewise, his service records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  His sincerity and service in Vietnam in an infantry specialty and unit are not in question.  However, there is insufficient evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while performing infantry duties in an infantry unit while the unit was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.

4.  In the absence of orders or additional documentary evidence that specifically shows he was under hostile fire while performing infantry duties with his infantry unit there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X_____  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002381



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002381



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009362

    Original file (20070009362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with a separation date of 15 July 1969, be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the CIB. The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022469

    Original file (20110022469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The certificates and citations provided by the applicant show that his awards were for meritorious service and there is no evidence in his records to show his encounters with the enemy. Although it is likely that he did encounter the enemy given he was a scout dog handler, not every infantryman in Vietnam had encounters with the enemy or were awarded the CIB simply for being an infantryman and being in country.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020488

    Original file (20140020488.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The units he was assigned to during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016884

    Original file (20110016884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal but does not include award of the medals the applicant is requesting. Holding an infantry MOS, being assigned to a qualifying unit, going on patrols, and receiving campaign credit alone are not sufficient to support award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, on 9 December 1970, qualified as an expert with the machinegun, and served in Vietnam during three campaign periods.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004351C070205

    Original file (20060004351C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam and he performed duties as an infantry when the unit was engaged in active ground combat. In this regard, the only evidence which would indicate the applicant did not perform his duties satisfactorily while engaged in active ground combat is the rating by his first platoon leader on his DA Form 20, and his commander’s recommendation to separate him for unfitness. The applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019336

    Original file (20100019336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant has not submitted any substantive evidence that shows he served in active ground combat. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008093

    Original file (20080008093.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the original consideration of his case, the applicant provided orders that showed he was promoted to Sergeant, E-5, on 15 August 1968 while in the 41st Infantry Platoon (Scout Dog) in MOS 11F4D. Regrettably, without the orders awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal or other corroborating evidence (e.g., an affidavit from the individual who recommended him for the award or from an individual who knew of the circumstances surrounding the recommendation for award and preferably the DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104577C070208

    Original file (2004104577C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that during his RVN tour, the applicant served as an infantryman/dog handler in a qualifying infantry unit and was present with and personally participated with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 15 July 1969 through 7 December 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014204

    Original file (20110014204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) * completion of the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course 2. The applicant provides a DD Form 214, DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Diploma for the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course, final transcript for the On Leash Scout Dog...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002683

    Original file (20150002683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal and Combat Infantryman Badge * issuance of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) showing these awards 2. With respect to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, GO awarded the applicant's unit, the 34th Infantry Platoon, 1st Cavalry Division, the Valorous Unit Award for extraordinary heroism during his period of service...