Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002833
Original file (20140002833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:    

		BOARD DATE:  18 September 2014  	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140002833 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was a high school graduate and he was serving in the rank of sergeant (SGT).

2.  The applicant states he was a high school graduate when he enlisted; however, his DD Form 214 shows he had a GED (General Educational Development) Diploma.  He also states he was promoted to the rank of SGT and served as a mess SGT. 

3.  The applicant provides a picture from his high school yearbook.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army as a high school graduate on      11 June 1968 for a period of 3 years.  He completed basic training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina and advanced individual training as an infantryman at Fort Polk, Louisiana before being transferred to Germany on 9 November 1968.  

3.  He was initially assigned to an infantry company as a rifleman and on 31 July 1969 he was assigned the duties of a cook and was awarded primary military occupational specialty 94B2O (Cook) on 15 September 1969.  He was promoted to the rank of specialist five (SP5) on 25 February 1970.

4.  On 26 April 1970, he departed Germany and he was transferred to Vietnam on 12 June 1970; he was assigned to an artillery battery as a first cook and mess steward.

5.  He departed Vietnam on 28 April 1971 and he was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 
29 April 1971.  He had served 2 years, 10 months, and 19 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 shows that he was REFRAD in the rank of SP5 and item 30 (Remarks) shows he had a GED. 

6.  A review of the applicant’s official records failed to show any evidence to indicate that he was promoted to the rank of SGT or that he was laterally appointed to the rank of SGT.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he had a GED instead of being a High School Graduate has been noted and found to have merit.  The applicant was a high school graduate when he enlisted and is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to reflect such.

2.  However, his contention that he was promoted to the rank of SGT is not supported by the evidence of record or the evidence submitted by the applicant.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was promoted to the rank of SGT, there appears to be no basis to grant that portion of the applicant’s request.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ____X___  ___X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

* Deleting the entry “GED” from item 30 of his DD Form 214
* Adding the entry “HS Grad” to item 30 of the DD Form 214

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing his rank to SGT. 

3.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002833



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002833



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015685

    Original file (20090015685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "Civilian Education: HS GED" from item 30 of his DD Form 214 and adding the entry "Civilian...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012191

    Original file (20100012191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that his rank at his time of separation from active duty was SGT not SP5 as shown on his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 5 October 1971. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was promoted to the rank of SGT on 8 February 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013658

    Original file (20130013658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. he completed his General Educational Development (GED); b. he served as a cook; c. his dates of service in Vietnam; and d. he had a monthly allotment in the amount of $100.00. However, there is no evidence of record and he provides no evidence which shows he completed his GED. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017570C070206

    Original file (20050017570C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 July 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050017570 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010288

    Original file (20130010288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) as follows: a. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; b. item 25 (Education and Training Completed) to show advance infantry (interpreted to mean the Light Weapons Infantryman course), food service, clerk, and food service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002315

    Original file (20150002315.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20140004147, on 6 November 2014. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other record that shows he was promoted or laterally appointed to the rank of SGT (E-5). Records show the applicant was appointed to the temporary rank/grade of SP5/E-5 on 19 January 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022409

    Original file (20110022409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for this period shows in: * item 3a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) his rank and pay grade as SGT, E-5 (T), indicating temporary grade * item 19c (Date of Entry) he enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 December 1963 * item 23 (Home of Record (HOR)) his HOR as Jayuya, PR * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) he wasn't awarded the POW Medal or Army Good Conduct Medal during this period * item 28 (Service Schools or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012889

    Original file (20140012889.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his records and he provides none to show he was awarded 15 awards of the Air Medal. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 14 April 1965 to 28 February 1967 * deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal, one overseas service bar, and the Air Medal * adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006805

    Original file (20090006805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that his general educational diploma (GED) was missing from his 201 file [military personnel records jacket] when he appeared before the promotion board. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: a supplemental letter, dated 6 March 2009; his GED test scores; a Standing List for Promotion to E-5, dated 23 November 1971; his DD Form 214 (Armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019236

    Original file (20130019236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, and Reductions) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was promoted to SP5/E-5 (T) on 3 April 1964 and SP5/E-5 (P) on 3 April 1965. Army Regulation 624-200, effective 1 July 1962, section III, governed the temporary appointment of enlisted personnel of the active Army to pay grades E-4 through E-9 made against periodic temporary appointment quota allocations issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army. However, all evidence in his records...