Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012191
Original file (20100012191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	   19 October 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012191 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank as sergeant.

2.  The applicant states his correct rank is sergeant in pay grade E-5.

3.  The applicant provides the following documentary evidence in support of his application:

	a.  Honorable Discharge Certificate showing rank as sergeant;

   b.  Department of the Army Certificate of Appreciation, dated 5 October 1971;
   
   c.  recondo course diploma, dated 10 August 1970;
   
   d.  U.S. Army Infantry School Airborne School certificate of completion, dated April 1969;
   
   e.  Certificate of Appreciation from the President of the United States; and
   
   f.  an IMJIN Scout insignia certificate, dated February 1971.
   



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 October 1968 for a 3-year period.  He completed his initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 12 May 1969 to 22 March 1970.  

3.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT) by Special Orders Number 048 issued by Headquarters, 2nd Infantry Division on 17 February 1971 with an effective date of promotion of 8 February 1971. 

4.  The applicant was relieved from active duty and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) by Special Orders Number 278 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis on 5 October 1971.  This order shows the applicant's rank was SGT. 

5.  On 5 October 1971, the applicant was released from active duty and received a DD Form 214 that shows in item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) "SP5" for specialist 5 and item 5b (Pay Grade) as "E-5."  He served on active duty for 3 years and 3 days.  The highest award he received was the Army Commendation Medal.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it directed that in item 5a enter grade in which serving at time of separation.  For item 5b, enter the date of rank for grade shown in item 5a. 



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his rank at his time of separation from active duty was SGT not SP5 as shown on his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 5 October 1971.

2.  Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was promoted to the rank of SGT on 8 February 1971.  Therefore, he is entitled to a correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank at separation was SGT not SP5 as currently shown.

BOARD VOTE:

__X____  __X_____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows:

	a.  remove from item 5a the entry "SP5"; and

	b.  add to item 5a the entry "SGT."





      _________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012191



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012191



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009445

    Original file (20130009445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to SP5, pay grade E-5, on 9 June 1971. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to correct item 5a of his DD Form 214 to show his rank as SGT. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020607

    Original file (20130020607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) to show the rank of specialist five (SP5) * Item 5b (Pay Grade) to show pay grade E-5 2. The regulation states items 5a and 5b would list the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and item 6 would list the effective date for the grade shown in items 5a and 5b. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011488

    Original file (20120011488.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. Special Orders Number 231 that promoted the applicant to SGT/E-5 effective 4 August 1971 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a, 5b, and 6 of his DD Form 214. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000641

    Original file (20130000641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was separated in the rank of SGT/E-5 because he assumed an NCOIC position and the individual he replaced held the rank of SGT. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was appointed or promoted to the rank of SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000285

    Original file (20150000285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders indicate this promotion was temporary; however, his DA Form 20 shows this promotion was made permanent on 23 September 1969, under the authority of Army Regulation 600-200, paragraph 7-22a. An individual could not be promoted to SGT or staff sergeant if the promotion would cause a surplus of by-grade authorized NCO personnel in the unit to which the individual was assigned. There are no orders promoting him to the rank of SGT in his records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017258

    Original file (20130017258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was placed on the promotion list before his separation. On 4 August 1971, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, published Special Orders Number 216 releasing him from active duty effective 4 August 1971. Absent the publication of the promotion instrument - a promotion order - there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011324

    Original file (20100011324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant was promoted to the rank of SSG prior to 5 September 1972 and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show differently. His DD Form 214 shows he separated as an SP5; however, the MOS shown on his DD Form 214 is 13B4O. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank as SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001611

    Original file (20140001611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 October 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140001611 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * self-authored statements * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * two previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) determinations, AR20130000641 and AC98-08428 * second page of Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division, Special Orders Number 21, dated 21 January 1967 CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008507

    Original file (20120008507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 January 1967. While in Vietnam: * he was issued a certificate that shows he completed the Lightning Combat Leaders Course from 19 to 27 August 1967 * Unit orders Number 49, issued by Headquarters, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry, on 5 August 1967 promoted him to the permanent (P) rank/grade of private first class/E-3 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001815

    Original file (20110001815.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as staff sergeant (SSG)/ E-6. The evidence shows: a. he presented an Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 15 June 1980, showing he was an SSG, b. he was placed on the retired list on 20 January 2011 in the retired grade of SSG, and c. a lined through entry on his DA Form 2-1 that shows he was promoted to the rank of SSG effective 13 April 1977, with a second...