Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001256
Original file (20140001256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001256 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the removal of Orders Number 132-88L published by Headquarters, 81st Regional Command on 11 May 2000 from his records.  

2.  The applicant states he was reassigned due to unsatisfactory participation but they are in error because he was not in an active Reserve status in January 2000 because he had requested to be placed in the Individual Ready Reserve in August 1998.  The orders are a negative reflection on him and prevent him from applying for other military jobs. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier who is currently serving in the pay grade of E-7.  He received his 20-year letter on 8 December 2011. 

2.  The applicant’s records contain Orders 047-32, date 19 February 1999, showing he was discharged from the USAR effective 16 February 1999.  

3.  He apparently reenlisted in the USAR on 4 June 1999.

4.  The applicant’s records contain Orders D-06-033624, dated 13 June 2000, showing he was discharged from the USAR effective 13 June 2000.

4.  The applicant’s records shows that on 11 May 2000, Orders Number 132-88L published by Headquarters, 81st Regional Command reassigned the applicant to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due to unsatisfactory participation.

5.  His records also show that Orders Number 03-121-00001 published by Headquarters, 87th Division on 1 May 2003 transferred the applicant to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due to unsatisfactory participation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted and appear to lack merit.  The evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record are insufficient to show that the orders in question are either in error or unjust.

2.  This is especially true given the fact that his records contain orders showing that he has been declared an unsatisfactory participant on at least two occasions. 

3.  In addition, his records contain orders indicating he was discharged from the USAR on 16 February 1999; documents indicating he again enlisted in the USAR on 4 June 1999; and was again discharged, on 13 June 2000.  These documents render his claim that his transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve in August 1998 overrides the May 2000 reassignment orders moot.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show otherwise, there appears to be no basis to remove the orders from his records.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001256





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001256



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001256

    Original file (20140001256 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional documents with his application. The applicant’s records contain Orders D-06-033624, dated 13 June 2000, showing he was discharged from the USAR effective 13 June 2000. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014440

    Original file (20090014440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of the reason for his release from his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit from unsatisfactory performance to a more favorable reason so he may enlist in the Regular Army (RA). However, his records contain a copy of Orders 070-75L, issued by Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Birmingham, AL, dated 10 March 2000, that show he was released from the 12th Legal Service Team 3 and reassigned to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) in accordance with Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016707

    Original file (20130016707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant request, in effect, retention of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR); correction to his leave; and correction to his insurance coverage. The applicant's SLRP records indicate he enlisted in the USAR 17 April 1999 and was authorized to receive $10,000 toward the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * revoking Order Number 02-074-012, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007478

    Original file (20060007478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that following her relocation to Georgia in 2001 she attempted to get a different TPU (Troop Program Unit) assignment but was unable to do so. All of the correspondence and orders issued during this period list her rank as a SGT and was sent to addresses in Mississippi. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), paragraph 4-15 (Involuntary reassignment for unsatisfactory participation) states that a TPU Soldier who has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056796C070420

    Original file (2001056796C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She further states that had she known this she would not have reenlisted for another 3 years. On 4 May 2000, the ARPERSCOM published orders discharging her from the USAR effective 10 May 2000. Therefore, the Board finds that her discharged orders should be revoked and that she be reinstated to her previous status in the USAR with credit for all drills (points only) that she earned during the appropriate retirement years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007809

    Original file (20090007809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. With respect to any financial hardship, while the Board is sympathetic to this issue, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued an order to active duty, an order for his release from active duty, and a DD Form 214 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015671

    Original file (20140015671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests either the reversal of the action or removal of any documents related to unsatisfactory participation during his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for the period 29 August 1991 to 25 January 2000. Army Regulation 600-8-104 states, once placed in the OMPF, a document becomes a permanent part of that file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073506C070403

    Original file (2002073506C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. USAR soldiers must request a waiver and submit documentation to show that nonparticipation was due to circumstances beyond their control. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010927

    Original file (20110010927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record of a reenlistment or extension subsequent to 17 June 2000 and no record that separation/discharge orders were published to effect his discharge on 17 June 2000. These orders stated that he would remain subject to the Reserve Component unit stop loss policy for 90 days after his release from active duty date. The evidence of record supports the applicant's claim that he was subject to Stop Loss and held on active duty past his ETS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021255

    Original file (20130021255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 July 1998, the applicant was released from active duty and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...