Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014440
Original file (20090014440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014440 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of the reason for his release from his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit from unsatisfactory performance to a more favorable reason so he may enlist in the Regular Army (RA).

2.  The applicant states when he joined the USAR, he attended drill but he was then transferred with his employer out of state to Georgia and he was told there wasn't a Reserve unit with the same military occupational specialty (MOS).  He was told he would be transferred back to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) for the remainder of his contract. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 May 1999.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the RA on 3 May 1996 and he held MOS 19D (Cavalry Scout).  The highest rank/grade he attained during his military service was specialist (SPC)/E-4.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 2 May 1999 by reason of completion of required active service and he was initially assigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  However, shortly prior to his release, his orders were amended to show his assignment to the 12th Legal Service Team 3, Greensboro, NC, a troop program unit (TPU).

4.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge from the USAR are not available for review with this case.  However, his records contain a copy of Orders 070-75L, issued by Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Birmingham, AL, dated 10 March 2000, that show he was released from the
12th Legal Service Team 3 and reassigned to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) in accordance with Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, or Transfers), paragraph 4-18, by reason of unsatisfactory performance.

5.  His current ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) does not reflect participation in any unit drills since his release from active duty on 2 May 1999.

6.  Army Regulation 140-10 covers policy and procedures for assigning, attaching, removing, and transferring USAR Soldiers.  Paragraph 4–18 of this regulation provides for the involuntary reassignment for failing to report to a TPU or individual mobilization augmentee (IMA) assignment [No Show].  It states that the responsible authority will reassign a Soldier from a TPU or IMA assignment to the appropriate IRR control group when the Soldier fails to report and cannot be located within 90 days after the date of release from Active Army status; or reassignment from the IRR; or reassignment from another TPU or IMA assignment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s record is void of the facts and circumstances that led to his discharge.  However, his record contains a properly-issued order, published by an appropriate authority, directing his release from his TPU to the USAR Control Group (IRR) for unsatisfactory performance.
2.  It appears the applicant failed to report to his unit of assignment and could not be located within 90 days after the date of release from active duty or reassignment from the IRR.  Accordingly, he was appropriately released for unsatisfactory performance.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of the governing regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected.  He has provided no evidence that would indicate the contrary.

3.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  He did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014440



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014440



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005634

    Original file (20130005634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows that prior to his deployment to Iraq he relocated to New York. The applicant has not provided evidence that shows he requested transfer to the IRR due to his relocation to Georgia. There is no evidence of error in his record of unexcused absences.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028299

    Original file (20100028299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 26 April 1999. However, her records contain a copy of Orders 02-043-015, issued by Headquarters, 88th Regional Support Command, Fort Snelling, MN, dated 12 February 2002, that show she was released from Company C, 983rd Engineer Battalion, and reassigned to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training), effective 27 February 2002, in accordance with Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013811

    Original file (20110013811.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the same day, he signed a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit assignment. Orders C-09-118-00012, dated 28 April 2009, released him from the current assignment and reassigned him to the IRR, effective 28 April 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Orders C-09-118-00012, issued by Headquarters, 335th Signal Command, East Point, GA, dated 28 April 2009,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029609

    Original file (20100029609.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through her Member of Congress, the removal of the inactive time from 7 March 1994 to 31 August 1999 from her records. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) provides for the separation of officers of the Army National Guard of the United States and the U.S. Army Reserve, except for officers serving on active duty or active duty for training exceeding 90 days. The evidence of record, during the period 11 September 1993 through 7 November 1993, shows she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007478

    Original file (20060007478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that following her relocation to Georgia in 2001 she attempted to get a different TPU (Troop Program Unit) assignment but was unable to do so. All of the correspondence and orders issued during this period list her rank as a SGT and was sent to addresses in Mississippi. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), paragraph 4-15 (Involuntary reassignment for unsatisfactory participation) states that a TPU Soldier who has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003002

    Original file (20150003002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 7249-R (Annex A, Certificate and Acknowledgement of Service Requirements of Fulfillment for Individuals Enlisting or Transferring into Troop Program Units (TPU) of the Army National Guard/USAR upon REFRAD/Discharge from Active Army Service) shows the applicant: a. Initialed the block indicating "Transfer to a Troop Program Unit of the U.S. Army Reserve." Instead, they put him out as an unsatisfactory participant. The evidence shows reassignment orders for unsatisfactory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010331

    Original file (20070010331.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 December 1992. b. U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Memorandum, dated 31 December 1992, appointing her as a Reserve commissioned officer. e. Page 1 of Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 26 October 2000. f. Headquarters, 75th Division (Training Support),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016707

    Original file (20130016707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant request, in effect, retention of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR); correction to his leave; and correction to his insurance coverage. The applicant's SLRP records indicate he enlisted in the USAR 17 April 1999 and was authorized to receive $10,000 toward the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * revoking Order Number 02-074-012, dated...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010596

    Original file (20050010596.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his involuntary transfer to the Retired Reserve be changed to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve for medical reasons. Further, the applicant failed to provide any medical evidence that would indicate he suffered from a disqualifying medical condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009807

    Original file (20070009807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 August 2004, the applicant wrote to HRC-St. Louis and requested a transfer to the IRR from the Retired Reserves so he could return as a drilling/active member of the 35th Signal Battalion (USAR). Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. The request for transfer to a TPU from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) did not...