Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010950
Original file (20080010950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  11 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010950 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his 28 March 1983 discharge for reenlistment be considered complete and unconditional.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his honorable service performed through 28 March 1983, should entitle him to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.  

3.  The applicant provides a self authored statement in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's military personnel records show he initially enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) and entered active duty on 2 April 1980, for a 3 year period.  He continuously served on active duty for 2 years, 11 months, and 27 days until 28 March 2003, at which time he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment, and on 29 March 1983, he reenlisted and remained on active duty.

3.  The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows he was promoted to the rank of specialist four (SP4) on 1 February 1981, and that this was the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  It also shows that he was reduced to the rank of private/E-2 (PV2) on 18 January 1986.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:  Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM); 
Army Achievement Medal (AAM); Army Service Ribbon (ASR); Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR); Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar.  Item 21 (Time Lost) shows he accrued a total of 1,265 days of time lost during two separate periods absence without leave (AWOL).  The first period was from 
12 through 13 April 1984, and the second was from 19 May 1986 through
2 November 1989. 

4.  On 10 January 1990, the applicant was discharged, in the rank of private/E-1 (PV1), under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial, and received an UOTHC discharge.  The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued shows he completed a total of 6 years, 3 months, and 24 days of creditable active military service and that he accrued 1,265 days of time lost due to AWOL.  It also shows he earned the following awards:  AAM; AGCM; ASR; OSR; Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar.  

5.  There is no evidence indicating that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its
15-year statute of limitations.  However, on 22 May 2008, this Board acted on the applicant's request to upgrade his UOTHC discharge.  The Board determined the applicant's discharge was proper and equitable, and it denied his request for an upgrade.  A complete and unconditional discharge based on his first enlistment was not requested by the applicant, nor was it addressed by the Board.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. 
7.  Chapter 2 of the separation documents regulation contains item-by-item instructions for preparing the DD Form 214.  The instructions for Item 18 state, in pertinent part, that the entry "SOLDIER (HAS) (HAS NOT) COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" is mandatory.  It further states that routinely a Soldier should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs before the end of the initial contracted period of service.  However, if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract.  The instructions further state that for enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by this DD Form 214, enter "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD" (specify dates).  However, for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable," enter "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which DD Form 214 was not issued) Until (date before commencement of current enlistment). Then, enter the specific periods of reenlistments as prescribed above.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should be granted a complete and unconditional discharge for his initial period of active duty service has been carefully considered and found to have partial merit.  Unconditional service determinations under Public Law Number 95-126 and entitlement to veteran's benefits based on these determinations are within the purview of the VA, and will be made by that agency.  However, entries are required on the DD Form 214 to assist the VA and State agencies in making these benefit entitlement determinations.

2.  By regulation, an entry in Item 18 stipulating if a member has or has not completed the first full term of service is mandatory.  Although routinely a Soldier should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs before the end of the initial contracted period of service, if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract.  The governing regulation also stipulates that the immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a 
DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable" will contain the entry "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which DD Form 214 was not issued) Until (date before commencement of current enlistment), and then the specific periods of reenlistments will be entered.  


3.  Based on the regulatory guidance, given the applicant completed all but three days of his first three-year enlistment and ended his first enlistment with an immediate reenlistment, the entries "SOLDIER HAS COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" should be added to Item 18 of his DD Form 214, and the immediate reenlistment entry in Item 18 should be modified to read 
"Continuous Honorable Active Service From 800402 Until 830328."  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 18 of his DD Form 214 by adding the entry “SOLDIER HAS COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" and by modifying the immediate reenlistment entry to read "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM FROM 800402 UNTIL 830328 - IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD "800402-830328"; and by providing him a correction to his separation document that includes these changes.  

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting a complete and unconditional discharge determination or any determination relating to entitlement to veterans benefits.



      _________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010950



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010950


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016346

    Original file (20080016346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued at the time shows he held the rank of PV1 and had completed a total of 6 years, 6 months, and 28 days of creditable active military service. The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable." As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001252

    Original file (20140001252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he ever accepted NJP. The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable." As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting a complete and unconditional discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072610C070403

    Original file (2002072610C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: The Army Discharge Review Board had denied his request for an upgraded discharge on 6 February 1980 (not 1988). That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was eligible for a complete and unconditional separation from the military service at the time of his honorable discharge on 28 April 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000253

    Original file (20150000253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract. Therefore, the entry "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD: 16 MARCH 2009 – 19 APRIL 2013" should be added to item 18 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074429C070403

    Original file (2002074429C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was honorably discharged on 26 June 1980 for the purpose of reenlisting on 27 June 1980 for 6 years. It directed that the following statement would be added to all DD Forms 214 without exception: “Member (has) (has not) completed first term of service.” Normally, a member should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs prior to the end of the initial contracted period of service. That all of the Department of the Army records related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059782C070421

    Original file (2001059782C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. It would not be appropriate to change the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged honorably from the reenlistment commencing on 10 November 1982.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088294C070403

    Original file (2003088294C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to general or honorable and that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 26 January 1983 show his first period of service as honorable. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was eligible for a complete and unconditional separation from the military service at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062624C070421

    Original file (2001062624C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted and entered active duty on 23 February 1968. However, a first endorsement to the applicant’s 15 January 1975 request for discharge for the good of the service, states that the applicant was allegedly AWOL from 2 January 1974 to 6 January 1975, and was being recommended for discharge with issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The Board is cognizant of the applicant’s prior good service and his 30 months of Vietnam service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014984

    Original file (20080014984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed his first term of service. At the time of his discharge, he had completed 2 years and 8 days of his enlistment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "MEMBER HAS NOT COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" from item 18 of his DD Form 214; and b. adding the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011738

    Original file (20060011738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he did complete his first full term of service and he reenlisted on 21 August 2003. Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend item 18 on the applicant’s DD Form 214 to: a. delete the entry “MEMBER HAS NOT COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE;” and b. add the entries “SOLDIER HAS COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE” and “Continuous Honorable Active Service From 22 February 2001 Until 20 August 2003, IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENT THIS PERIOD: 22 February 2001 - 20 August...