| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Member | ||
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to upgrade his undesirable discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
3. The applicant states that he needs the upgraded discharge to access Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits. He provides his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, from his first enlistment and two letters from the VA as supporting evidence. The letter dated 26 September 2000 indicates that, because the applicant immediately reenlisted in the Army, the VA will not recognize his DD Form 214 showing his honorable service and Purple Heart.
4. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 18 August 1993 (docket number AC93-08754).
5. The DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 August 1972 in the applicant’s military personnel records is annotated “void.” It cannot be determined why it is so annotated. The Army Discharge Review Board had denied his request for an upgraded discharge on 6 February 1980 (not 1988).
6. The VA, in determining qualifications for benefits administered by that agency, generally holds that an individual who accepts a discharge prior to completion of his complete term of obligated service may not be eligible for benefits unless or until the VA or the Service Department determines that the early discharge amounted to a complete and unconditional separation from the service.
7. Commander, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) message 150800Z February 1995 clarified an earlier message concerning a member’s initial term of service. It stated that, normally, a member should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs prior to the end of the initial contracted period of service. However, if a member reenlists prior to the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment and should be considered to have been completed upon execution of a reenlistment contract. If a soldier has reenlisted, he or she is considered to have completed the first full term of enlistment.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
3. However, the applicant has expressed a concern that the VA does not recognize that he satisfactorily completed his initial term of service. It appears that his honorable discharge of 28 April 1970 should be considered as having been issued as a complete and unconditional separation. Under current standards, if a member reenlists prior to the completion of that period of service the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment and should be considered to have been completed upon execution of a reenlistment contract. If a soldier has reenlisted, he or she is considered to have completed the first full term of enlistment.
4. The circumstances of the applicant’s honorable discharge of 28 April 1970 appear to have worked an injustice upon him by depriving him of consideration for certain VA benefits for the preceding period of service. However, the applicant should understand that the Department of Defense has no jurisdiction over the VA. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, may or may not grant entitlement to VA benefits based upon the correction recommended below.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was eligible for a complete and unconditional separation from the military service at the time of his honorable discharge on 28 April 1970.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__JNS __ __INW __ __JAM __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___ John N. Slone ___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002072610 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/08/15 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1972/08/16 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074429C070403
He was honorably discharged on 26 June 1980 for the purpose of reenlisting on 27 June 1980 for 6 years. It directed that the following statement would be added to all DD Forms 214 without exception: “Member (has) (has not) completed first term of service.” Normally, a member should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs prior to the end of the initial contracted period of service. That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062624C070421
The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted and entered active duty on 23 February 1968. However, a first endorsement to the applicant’s 15 January 1975 request for discharge for the good of the service, states that the applicant was allegedly AWOL from 2 January 1974 to 6 January 1975, and was being recommended for discharge with issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The Board is cognizant of the applicant’s prior good service and his 30 months of Vietnam service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001252
However, there is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he ever accepted NJP. The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable." As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting a complete and unconditional discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059782C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. It would not be appropriate to change the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged honorably from the reenlistment commencing on 10 November 1982.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016346
The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued at the time shows he held the rank of PV1 and had completed a total of 6 years, 6 months, and 28 days of creditable active military service. The governing regulation also provides for immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 of the DD Form 214 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable." As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088294C070403
The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to general or honorable and that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 26 January 1983 show his first period of service as honorable. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was eligible for a complete and unconditional separation from the military service at the time of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010950
The applicant's military personnel records show he initially enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) and entered active duty on 2 April 1980, for a 3 year period. The governing regulation also stipulates that the immediate reenlistment entries in Item 18 for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable" will contain the entry "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075228C070403
It directed that the following statement would be added to all DD Forms 214 without exception: “Member (has) (has not) completed first term of service.” Normally, a member should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs prior to the end of the initial contracted period of service. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That the applicant’s DD Form 214, item 18 be amended to show he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062400C070421
Item 18 contains the statement “Member has not completed first full term of service.” Normally, a member should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs prior to the end of the initial contracted period of service. That the applicant’s DD Form 214, item 18, be amended to show he had completed his first full term of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011333
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110013209, dated 26 January 2012. However, for Soldiers who had previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, and who were being separated with any characterization of service other than "Honorable," the first entry would be: "Continuous Honorable Active Service From...