Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022212
Original file (20130022212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    20 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130022212 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his honorable discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve be changed to a medical discharge.  

2.  He states:

* he was not able to attend a medical evaluation board (MEB) because of problems that were occurring in his life
* his military duties were causing his mental health to worsen and to affect him physically
* he was promised an MEB and a medical discharge, but they forgot or lost his files
* he was not attending an MEB, but he was getting help at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital

3.  He provides numerous medical documents from the VA.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 2001.  

3.  On 17 September 2003, he received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for driving under the influence of alcohol on 8 August 2003.  He elected not to make or submit documents in his behalf.  

4.  He served in Iraq from 15 August 2003 – 19 September 2004.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 29 December 2004.  On the following day, he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his military service obligation.  

6.  His service record includes the following orders which show:

	a.  Orders C-12-528467, dated 14 December 2005, published by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, he was released from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and he was reassigned to a Troop Program Unit (TPU) in Lincoln, NE, effective 13 December 2005.  

   b.  Orders 06-011-00031, dated 11 January 2006, published by Headquarters, 90th Regional Readiness Command, North Little Rock, AR, he was released from his current assignment and was reassigned to a TPU in North Little Rock, AR, effective 11 January 2006.

	c.  Orders 08-258-01053, dated 14 September 2008, published by Headquarters, 90th Regional Readiness Command, North Little Rock, AR, he was released from his current assignment and he was reassigned to a TPU in Lincoln, NE, effective 14 September 2008.

	d.  Orders 09-120-00022, dated 30 April 2009, published by Headquarters, 108th Training Command (Initial Entry Training, Charlotte, NC, he was honorably discharged from the USAR, on 11 May 2009.

7.  His service record is void of medical documentation which indicates he was diagnosed with any medical conditions while in an active status.  



8.  He provided numerous medical documents from the VA, printed in December 2013:

	a.  The documents titled "Problem Lists" show he consulted a health provider at the VA in Omaha, NE regarding several medical conditions.  Some of the medical conditions included cannabis dependence, alcohol dependence, tinnitus, insomnia, bipolar disorder, and headache.  

	b.  Radiology Reports show he underwent examinations of his cervical spine (2 or 3 views); thoracic spine (2 views); lumbar spine (2 or 3 views); chest 
(2 views); computer tomography (CT) posterior fossa [small space in the skull] without contrast; CT of head/brain without contrast; spine cervical (2 views (anteroposterior (AP)/lateral); mandible [lower jaw] panorex; and hand (3 or more views).

	c.  Lab Results show he had tests conducted to analyze his blood, urine, cholesterol, feces, skin, and the results are listed.

	d.  Immunizations show he received vaccine for influenza and tetanus and diphtheria.

	e.  Discharge Summaries his diagnoses were listed as alcohol dependence, cannabis dependence, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar affective disorder, and tobacco use disorder at Axis I.  His final diagnoses were listed as bipolar disorder, Type l and chronic PTSD at Axis I.  

	f.  Consult Requests, he was granted service-connection for PTSD (50 percent (%)), irritable colon (30%), limitation on motion, ring or little finger (0%), migraine headaches (0%), and limitation of motion, thumb (0%) for a combined disability rating of 70 percent.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  The unfitness must be of such a degree that a Soldier is unable to perform the duties of his/her office, grade, rank, or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his/her employment on active duty.

10.  Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

11.  Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his/her continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he/she was unable to perform his/her duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation rendered the member unfit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Army from 7 September 2001 through 29 December 2004 and in the USAR from 30 December 2004 through 11 May 2009.  His service record is void of any medical documentation or other evidence that indicate any medical condition was incurred while entitled to receive basic pay which was so severe as to render the applicant medically unfit for retention on active duty.  

2.  The applicant's contention that he was unable to undergo an MEB because of problems he was experiencing is acknowledged.  However, his personal problems are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant granting him a medical discharge.  

3.  The applicant contends his military duties caused his mental health to worsen and affected him physically.  However, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence to support his claim.  

4.  The applicant's service record does not contain evidence to support his contention that he was promised an MEB and a medical discharge.  His service record is void of evidence which indicates he was recommended for referral to an MEB.

5.  The applicant's continued performance of assigned duties supports a presumption of fitness which he has not overcome by evidence of any unfitting, acute, grave illness or injury related to his service that prevented him from performing his duties.  Since he was not in an approved MEB process, his honorable discharge from the USAR on 11 May 2009 was proper and correct.  
His service record is void of evidence which indicates he was unable to perform his military duties.  Therefore, there was no reason to recommend him for physical disability evaluation processing.  

6.  Absent evidence that he incurred any medical conditions while he was entitled to basic pay or were the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty, he would not have been eligible for consideration by an MEB/Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and thus not eligible for a medical discharge.

7.  Medical records provided by the VA indicate that the applicant has been awarded compensation for medical conditions which that agency has determined to be related to military service.  The fact that the VA, in its discretion, has awarded the applicant a disability rating is a prerogative exercised within the policies of that agency.  It does not, in itself, establish physical unfitness for Department of the Army purposes.

8.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request for a medical discharge. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   ___X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022212



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022212



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015513

    Original file (20140015513.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015513 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. There is no evidence to show she had: * a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00062

    Original file (PD-2012-00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Treatment records document relief of headaches with medication. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Intervertebral Disc Syndrome 5243 10% COMBINED 10% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120118, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004803

    Original file (20140004803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 May 2008 to show she completed her first term of service * discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), dated 23 November 2011, to show she was medically retired vice medically disqualified * records to show she was separated/discharged/retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice specialist (SPC)/E-4 2. The applicant provides: * her DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009128

    Original file (20100009128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he was retired by reason of physical disability from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) with entitlement to associated benefits. In addition to the FEDS-HEAL document, the applicant also provides the following: * 1991 Army National Guard Annual Retirement Points Statement * Multiple copies of his Body Fat Content Worksheets dated between 1999 and February 2006 * January 2000 statement of medical examination and duty status * January...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01075

    Original file (PD-2012-01075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service treatment records (STR) confirm that the predominant mental health condition was the bipolar disorder and the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) in rendering a PTSD diagnosis, noted CI report of a traumatic stressor while deployed and that “at times he has experienced symptoms consistent with PTSD.” In accordance with DoDI 6040.44 and DoD guidance the Board is obligated to apply current VASRD §4.129 to Board cases with PTSD where appropriate, and recommend a minimum 50% PTSD rating for a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007123.

    Original file (20140007123..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) records as follows: * have the TNARNG complete a line of duty (LOD) investigation * have the TNARNG process him through the medical evaluation board/physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB) * medical retirement by reason of disability 2. Chapter 3 provides for various medical conditions and physical defects which may render a Soldier unfit for further military service and which fall below the standards required for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00005

    Original file (PD2011-00005.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of the MEB psychiatric exam, the CI was on medications for depression, anxiety and manic symptoms. The Axis I diagnoses were bipolar I disorder (most recent episode manic, severe with psychotic features); anxiety disorder, NOS and gender identity disorder. Other Conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014524

    Original file (20060014524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states that the applicant was separated from active duty on 15 October 2004, after 1 year, 8 months, and 13 days following a National Guard mobilization. According to Title 10, USC, section 1201, for a member on active duty for more than 30 days who is unfit because of physical disability, the Department Secretary may retire the member, with retired pay, if the member has at least 20 years of service computed under section 1208 of this title, or if the disability is at least thirty...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02486

    Original file (PD-2013-02486.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20081006 The Board notes that the PEB psychiatric statement dated 29 August 2008, 4 months prior to separation, specifically stated that the CI’s condition was medically acceptable. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021758

    Original file (20110021758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that when she returned home from basic training she started seeing a doctor for her knee pain. (2) She would be discharged from the USAR if she failed to complete the basic training program. Her record contains a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) which shows her effective date of entry on active duty was 5 June 2007 and the date she departed from her duty station to home was 18 August 2007, which resulted in being credited with 74 days of active duty service and...