Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020876
Original file (20130020876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:  5 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130020876 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he is entitled to a $15,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB).

2.  The applicant states his enlistment packet was not uploaded to the Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) when he first enlisted.  Therefore, he is not responsible for something he had no control over.  The $15,000 was promised in his enlistment contract.  He was qualified to receive the bonus.  He completed his six years of service.  Again, it was no way his fault that he was paid the incorrect amount for his bonus.

3.  The applicant did not provide any supporting documentation. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) on 
29 December 2005.

2.  His enlistment documents include a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States) and an Enlistment Bonus Addendum in which he indicated:

	a.  he was a non-prior service enlistee and had never previously served in the U.S. Armed Forces.

	b.  he was enlisting for military occupational specialty (MOS) of 92Y (Unit Supply Specialist) which had been identified as a $10,000 critical MOS.

	c.  he would receive a total bonus of $10,000 for the enlistment bonus option, less taxes.

	d.  his signature on the form is dated 29 December 2005.

3.  The DD Form 4 was uploaded to iPERMS on 22 February 2006 and the Enlistment Addendum was uploaded on 2 March 2006.

4.  A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he served on active duty from 5 June 2007 to 23 May 2008.  He was honorably released from active duty due to completion of required active service.

5.  His record shows he was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard and reassigned to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) effective 20 December 2011.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 31 December 2013.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Enlisted Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Department of the Army.  The advisory official states that:

	a.  A review of the applicant's case shows he was offered and contracted for the NPSEB for enlistment into Critical Skill 92Y.  His enlistment contract bonus addendum, dated 29 December 2005, states eligibility for a $10,000 bonus.

	b.  The applicant served the full six years, with a period of active duty and returned to the ARNG unit.  He was separated honorably on 28 December 2011.

	c.  Recommend the applicant receive the $10,000 payment of the NPSEB as stated in his original bonus addendum.

7.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comments or a rebuttal.  He responded and states:

	a.  he was paid $15,000 as a signing bonus for his service to the ARNG.  This has already been paid in two separate installments.

	b.  His contract clearly states his bonus was for $15,000 and he was paid accordingly.  It is not correct that he was only entitled to a $10,000 bonus.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant entered into a contract with the understanding showing he would receive a NPSEB of $10,000.  He signed the appropriate form.  

2.  There is no available evidence showing he contracted for or was led to believe he would receive an NPSEB of $15,000.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
      
      
      
      ____________ _X_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020775



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020876



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012701

    Original file (20130012701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director stated: * the MOS was not on the list of approved critical skills at the time of enlistment * a Bonus Addendum could not be found * a Bonus Control Number (BCN) was given which supported an incentive being offered at the time * a review of policy and her DD Form 4 supported an incentive being offered at the time 7. The advisory opinion further stated her DD Form 1966 and bonus addendum could not be found in her record, though her DD Form 4 supports an incentive being offered at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007760

    Original file (20120007760.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she enlisted in the Minnesota Army National Guard (MNARNG) on 15 January 2009 with an enlistment bonus. Based on this information the Bonus Addendum existed in iPERMS or another database in 2009. c. The second bonus payment is due and, unfortunately, the Bonus Addendum is missing from iPERMS. Her bonus addendum was obviously seen on 20 August 2009 in order for her BCN to be validated and for her to receive her first bonus payment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021642

    Original file (20130021642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * memorandum, dated 4 January 2013, from U.S. Property and Fiscal Office for California * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States), dated 11 April 2006 * Annex E to DD Form 4, Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard (ARNG) of the United States, dated 11 April 2006 * ARNG Fiscal Year (FY) 06 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Policy Guidance for 27 January 2006 - 31 May 2006 (Policy Number 06-04), dated 27 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011485

    Original file (20140011485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement, Army National Guard, Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment, dated 20 November 2009 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4, Non-prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States), dated 20 November 2009 * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) * Headquarters, Military Department, State of Washington Orders 161-952,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020491

    Original file (20130020491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    To qualify for an OAB the officer must sign the OAB Addendum on the date they accept their commission as a second lieutenant or appointment as a warrant officer and the Addendum must contain a bonus control number. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was appointed as an FLARNG 2LT EN Corps officer in the critical AOC of 12B and he executed an oath of office on 8 May 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002767

    Original file (20140002767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain a USAREC Form 1166, dated 11 August 2009, which shows he contracted for SELRES Special Pay in the amount of $20,000 annually for a period of 3 years, ending on 10 August 2012. The ARNG, Personnel Policy Division stated the applicant had already been paid $30,000 of the $45,000 total from the amended contract he signed in September 2013 and that there was no evidence to show the 66P special pay amount was reduced from $20,000 to $15,000. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011919

    Original file (20130011919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he remains entitled to his $15,000 Reenlistment Bonus (REB) and cancellation of any recoupment action. An NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 or DA Form 4836 Reenlistment/Extension Decentralized State Incentive Pilot Program Addendum), dated 19 September 2011. c. A DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 13 June 2012. d. A Joint Force Headquarters - Montana memorandum, Subject: Exception to Policy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019702

    Original file (20130019702.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he executed his enlistment and Bonus Addendum in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on the same date and payment of the second half of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). The applicant indicated/acknowledged he understood: * upon his enlistment in the ARNG, he would be eligible for an enlistment bonus as indicated in the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) * he was enlisting in a critical skill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017103

    Original file (20140017103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She formally requested an ETP from the State Incentive Manager on 1 October 2012, wherein she requested relief from, and termination of, the levied recoupment action in the amount of $20,428.45 that resulted from the termination of her incentive entitlements. (8) Furthermore, had she executed a written agreement the bonus would have been terminated in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), paragraph E3.l.8.2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019794

    Original file (20130019794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received a $10,000 bonus in two installments of $5,000 on 6 and 8 February 2008 after being informed by MSG J, the State Incentives Manager, that he was entitled to an officer bonus and the SLRP. (2) The applicant was eligible to contract for the SLRP but was not eligible for the $5,000 SLRP payment ($804.82 of which the loan holder returned to DFAS for overpayment) he received on 20 November 2007 (9 years after the last payment was authorized, and 3 years after the contract would have...