Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011485
Original file (20140011485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  14 April 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011485 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval of an exception to policy (ETP) to retain his $20,000 non-prior service enlistment bonus (NPSEB).

2.  The applicant states he enlisted in the Washington Army National Guard (WAARNG) for a term of 6 years in military occupational specialty (MOS) 35F (Intelligence Analyst) and signed a contract with an addendum for a $20,000 signing bonus.  His request for an ETP for the $20,000 has been denied because: 

* he did not contract for the proper term of service  
* his bonus addendum was obsolete  
* his bonus addendum was signed before his enlistment documents 

3.  He has spoken with two other members of his unit who shipped just before and after his ship date, had contracted for the same term and MOS, and were authorized the same signing bonus.  They have been paid their enlistment bonus.

4.  The applicant provides:

* his Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement, Army National Guard, Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment, dated 20 November 2009
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4, Non-prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States), dated 20 November 2009
* DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) 
* Headquarters, Military Department, State of Washington Orders 161-952, dated 10 June 2010
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of  4 November 2010
* a memorandum, dated 27 February 2014, from NGB, subject: Request for ETP for NPSEB for (the applicant)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the WAARNG on 20 November 2009 for a period of 1 year.

2.  The enlistment agreement he signed on 20 November 2009 stated he agreed to serve 6 years as an assigned member of a troop program unit in the Selected Reserve and 2 years as an assigned member of the Individual Ready Reserve.  He was enlisting for MOS 35F.

3.  His NGB Form 699-7-1-R-E, dated 20 November 2009, shows he was enlisting into a critical skill MOS under the 6x2 or 8x0 enlistment option and would receive a non-prior service (NPS) critical skill bonus (50/50 payment).  The total bonus is shown as $20,000 with payment of 50 percent (%) upon completion of initial active duty for training (IADT) and assignment of the MOS for which he enlisted.  The second and final payment of 50% was to be paid on the 
36-month anniversary of his date of enlistment.

4.  A second DD Form 4 shows he enlisted in the WAARNG on 1 February 2010 for a period of 7 years and 42 weeks.  He entered active duty on 26 April 2010 and completed his IADT on 4 November 2010.  He was awarded MOS 35F on 
4 November 2010.

5.  A memorandum, dated 27 February 2014, from NGB denied his request for an ETP to retain a $20,000 NPSEB.

	a.  He did not contract for the proper term of service on 20 November 2009 which violates Army National Guard (ARNG) Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06 Updated (1 March 2009 to 15 June 2010).

	b.  His contract/bonus addendum was obsolete which violates ARNG SRIP 07-06 Updated (1 March 2009 to 15 June 2010).

	c.  His bonus addendum was signed before the enlistment documents which violates ARNG SRIP 07-06 Updated (1 March 2009 to 15 June 2010).

	d.  His date of enlistment is shown as 1 February 2010 and his contracted bonus addendum, dated 20 November 2009, showed the bonus amount was $20,000.

	e.  He signed an obsolete addendum offering a $20,000 NPSEB when he was assigned to the Recruiting Force Pool-Inactive National Guard.  Soldiers enlisting under this option are not authorized incentives because they are not in an active status and the term of service is only for 1 year.  An individual must enlist for a minimum term of 3 years.

	f.  The ARNG recognized that this was at no fault of the Soldier and allowed the applicable $10,000 NPSEB addendum to be completed.  The $10,000 NPSEB will be in accordance with the SRIP policy based upon his enlistment to an active status on 1 February 2010.  The applicant has already received an initial 50% payment of $5,000 and will receive the remaining payment(s) in accordance with the proper incentive addendum.

	g.  The corrected copy of his NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E shows:

		1)  He was enlisting into critical skill 35F to serve no less than 6 years in a paid drill status for a $10,000 NPSEB.

		2)  His first installment of 50% was to be processed upon completion of his IADT.  A second 20% installment will be processed on the third-year anniversary and the final 30% installment will be processed on the sixth-year anniversary of his date of enlistment.

6.  ARNG SRIP 07-06 updated 17 February 2009 was effective 1 March 2009 and was to remain in effect until 30 September 2009.  Paragraph 6c showed the amount of the NPS critical skills (CS) bonus was $10,000.  Eligibility for the NPS CS bonus included enlistment in the 6x2 or 8x0 enlistment option.

7.  ARNG SRP 07-06 was updated on 15 March 2010 and was to remain in effect until 30 September 2009 (2010).  Paragraph 6c showed the amount of the NPS CS bonus was $10,000.  Eligibility for the NPS CS bonus included enlistment in the 6x2 or 8x0 enlistment option.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be allowed to retain a NPSEB of $20,000.  He contends two other members of his unit who shipped just before and just after his ship date have been paid their enlistment bonuses.  However, he provides no specifics pertaining to either case.  Therefore, there is no way to determine if their situation was exactly the same as the applicant's.

2.  At the time of his enlistment on 20 November 2009, he completed an obsolete NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E showing a $20,000 NPSEB.  At the time the NPSEB for enlisting in a CS was $10,000.  He enlisted for only 1 year in the Recruiting Force Pool-Inactive National Guard making him ineligible for an NPSEB.

3.  When he enlisted on 1 February 2010 the NPSEB for enlisting in a CS was $10,000.  However, he did not complete an additional NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E.

4.  NGB recognized the situation was no fault of the applicant.  NGB allowed for the applicable $10,000 NPSEB addendum to be completed.  The $10,000 NPSEB is in accordance with the SRIP policy in effect upon his enlistment to an active status on 1 February 2010.  The applicant has already received his initial payment of $5,000.

5.  In view of the above, there is no basis for granting the relief requested in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011485





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011485



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004060

    Original file (20130004060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states as part of her enlistment contract, in the bonus addendum, she was entitled to receive a $20,000.00 bonus. An exception to policy (ETP) memorandum was approved on 6 September 2013 by the ARNG for the applicant to retain the $10,000.00 NPSEB offered at the time of her enlistment, but payment of the remaining $5,000.00 was not made due to her accepting a MilTech position on 5 September 2012. c. The anniversary payment for this bonus was scheduled for payment on 26 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016923

    Original file (20130016923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 24 August 2011 * Guard Annex (Enlistment Agreement Army National Guard (ARNG) Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment), dated 29 August 2011 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4 NPS Critical Paragraph/Line Number [Military Occupational Specialty] MOS Enlistment Bonus Decentralized State Incentive Pilot Program (DSIPP) Addendum ARNG of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002085

    Original file (20130002085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests cancellation of the recoupment action that requires him to repay his $20,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) for Critical Skill military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist) in the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG) and that he be allowed to retain the bonus as an exception to policy (ETP). He stated the applicant contracted for a $20,000 NPS Critical Skill Enlistment Bonus as a 68W on 4 August 2008. He stated the applicant contracted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020728

    Original file (20140020728.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the ORARNG on 7 March 2009 for military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist) * at the time of his enlistment, MOS 91B was a critical MOS and offered a $20,000 lump sum bonus * he was processed by his recruiter and completed training; when he returned to his unit, he was told he would receive only $10,000 * his DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing) states "a critical Unit Identification Code (UIC) valid vacancy, $20,000 bonus" *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017328

    Original file (20130017328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 April 2006, he signed Annex E to DD Form 4, Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States. He signed a DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) on 14 January 2008, applying for enlistment in the PRARNG. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the PRARNG for a period of 7 years, 7 months, and 18 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017817

    Original file (20130017817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017817 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he signed a 6x2 enlistment contract in the Nebraska Army National Guard (NEARNG) and agreed to serve in military occupational specialty (MOS) 25U (Signal Support Systems Specialist) * in 2011, after serving 4 years, including a 1-year deployment, he changed his MOS to 15T (Blackhawk Mechanic), in order to benefit his unit * although he changed his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140006914

    Original file (AR20140006914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his statement via a memorandum for record (MFR), subject: Request for Exception to Policy to be Granted for Payment of the Active First Enlistment Bonus for [Applicant], dated 20 December 2012. The Guard Annex (Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement ARNG Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment), Section III (Explanation to Applicant) shows in paragraph 1, in pertinent part, that: * he would serve in the ARNG from the time of his accession into the ARNG through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012092

    Original file (20130012092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement, dated 13 June 2013 * Memorandum, undated * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 10 March 2006 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 9 February 2007 * Doctor's Note/pregnancy instructions, dated 26 February 2007 * Orders Number 109-660, dated 19 April 2007 * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing-Armed Forces of the United States), dated 14 March 2008 * Guard Annex, dated 14 March 2008 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019702

    Original file (20130019702.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he executed his enlistment and Bonus Addendum in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on the same date and payment of the second half of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). The applicant indicated/acknowledged he understood: * upon his enlistment in the ARNG, he would be eligible for an enlistment bonus as indicated in the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) * he was enlisting in a critical skill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002402

    Original file (20150002402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant did not date the SLRP addendum and stated his DD Form 4 was not filled out correctly in that the DD Form 4 did not show the SLRP had been offered. The applicant provides: * DA Form 4, dated 21 January 2010 * Guard Annex (Enlistment/Reenlistment Army National Guard (ARNG) Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment), dated 21 January 2010 * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 21 January 2010 * DA Form 4187, dated 6 may...