Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020687
Original file (20130020687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved



	

		BOARD DATE:	  3 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130020687 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:

16.  On 13 November 2013, new information was received from the Director, Human Resources, Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG), requesting amendment of the previous advisory opinion rendered by the Acting Chief, Personnel Policy Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB), to authorize back pay based on the applicant being reinstated in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status by the AGR Tour Continuation Board and a corresponding supplemental action in regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120016408, dated 30 April 2013.

17.  On 25 November 2013, new information was also received from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB, in regard to the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20120016408, dated 30 April 2013.  The evidence submitted consists of the following information:

   a.  The applicant was separated by an AGR Tour Continuation Board due to a referred DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)).  She was released from active duty (REFRAD) in an AGR status on 4 April 2012.

   b.  Following the ABCMR's	 decision to correct the applicant's OER covering the period 1 February 2010 through 19 March 2011, the AGR Tour Continuation Board reversed its decision and the applicant was reinstated into the AGR program.  However, in the absence of having any retroactive appointment/ reinstatement authority, there is about a one year gap in service between her date of separation and date of reentry into an AGR status.

   c.  The NGB advisory opinion and ABCMR decision did not address reimbursement of pay and allowances that might result from her retroactive reinstatement into the AGR program.

18.  The applicant was provided a copy of the ex parte communications in order to have the opportunity to comment.   On 10 December 2013, the applicant indicated she agreed with the information and added that in order to achieve full administrative relief, the following actions would be required for the period of time under review:

* payment of pay and allowances
* credit for accrued leave
* creditable service (retirement points)

19.  Joint Forces Headquarters Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, Orders 080-1012, dated 20 March 2012, released the applicant from active duty in AGR status, in the rank of captain (CPT)/pay grade of O-3, effective 4 April 2012, and returned her to the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG).

20.  Joint Forces Headquarters, Indiana National Guard, Indianapolis, IN,
Orders A-06-209862, dated 1 June 2012, ordered the applicant to active duty, in the reserve rank of first lieutenant (1LT)/pay grade O-2, for Contingency Operations for Active Duty Operational Support (CO-ADOS) in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), on 25 June 2012, for a period of 98 days (through 30 September 2012).

21.  Joint Forces Headquarters, Indiana National Guard, Indianapolis, IN,
Orders A-08-214560, dated 15 August 2012, ordered the applicant to active duty, in the reserve rank of CPT (O-3), for CO-ADOS in support of OEF-CSB, on
1 October 2012, for a period of 365 days (through 30 September 2013).

22.  Camp Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center, Edinburgh, IN, 
Orders 010-1001, dated 10 January 2013, released the applicant from active duty, in the rank of CPT (O-3), effective 10 January 2013, and returned her to the INARNG.  (The effective date of pay grade O-3 was 24 January 2012.)

23.  Joint Forces Headquarters Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, Orders 011-001, dated 11 January 2013, as amended by Orders 014-001, dated 14 January 2013, ordered the applicant to active duty in an AGR status, in the rank CPT (O-3), for the period 11 January 2013 through 10 January 2019.
24.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, volume 7A (Military Pay Policy and Procedures - Active Duty and Reserve Pay), chapter 1 (Basic Pay), paragraph 0101 (Creditable service), shows that several military pay and personnel systems use a variety of dates to determine various entitlements.  It also shows creditable service periods include active or inactive service, in pertinent part, in the Army National Guard of the United States and Army National Guard and that for most members who enter and serve on active duty without a break in service, the basic pay date is the date the member enters active or inactive service.  

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

3.  At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20120016408, dated 30 April 2013, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicant's record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.

4.  The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20120016408 failed to address the issue of the applicant's entitlement to retroactive pay and allowances that might be due if the records correction resulted in her reinstatement in the AGR program to the date immediately following the date she was REFRAD in an AGR status on 4 April 2012.

5.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was REFRAD in AGR status on 
4 April 2012 and returned to the INARNG.

6.  She was ordered to active duty (OAD) for CO-ADOS in the rank of 1LT (O-2) from 25 June 2012 through 30 September 2012 and further OAD for CO-ADOS in the rank of CPT (O-3) on 1 October 2012 and she continued to serve in that status through 10 January 2013.

7.  She was OAD in an AGR status, in the rank CPT (O-3), for the period 11 January 2013 through 10 January 2019.

8.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate at this time to correct the applicant's records to show she was reappointed/reinstated in the AGR program effective 5 April 2012, with no break in her AGR status in the rank of CPT (O-3).  


BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

2.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records set forth in Docket Number AR20120016408, dated 30 April 2013, to show she was reappointed/reinstated in the AGR program and AGR status effective 5 April 2012 and credited with the appropriate qualifying creditable service, and entitlement to all back pay in grade O-3 (i.e., pay and allowances less withholdings) and accrued leave resulting from her retroactive appointment/ reinstatement into the AGR program and AGR status effective 5 April 2012.

3.  As a result of this correction, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall be notified of the Board's determination and pay the applicant all back pay in grade O-3 (i.e., pay and allowances less withholdings) that she may be due and also credit her account with all accrued leave resulting from her retroactive appointment/reinstatement in AGR status effective 5 April 2012.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020687



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Supplemental Record of Proceedings (cont)                 AR20130020687



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008410

    Original file (20140008410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Personnel Management Officer (PMO) recommended approval of the applicant's request, stating: * he is not sure why the Army recruiter told the applicant it would be easier to get him in as a 1LT * it is not a question of ease, it is a question of law and legality * the applicant's initial appointment should have been as a CPT Chaplain in accordance with Army Regulation 135-100 (ARNG and USAR Appointment of Commission and Warrant Officers of the Army), Table 3-1 * the applicant's DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004594

    Original file (20110004594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Should the initial period of temporary Federal recognition expire due to administrative processing delays though no fault of the applicant, a subsequent Federal recognition board should be convened and another period of temporary Federal recognition granted, if warranted." Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her records to show she was extended Federal recognition effective 13 December 2008 with a DOR to 2LT of 13 December 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015946

    Original file (20130015946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 2-2 states to qualify for selection, commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) must complete the military educational requirements in table 2-2 not later than the day before the selection board convene date. The Fiscal Year 2013 promotion board convened on 27 November 2012 and considered her non-educationally qualified and she was again not selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015324

    Original file (20140015324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he is presently serving in a position that is one rank higher than he presently holds * his record was corrected to show he was granted Federal recognition as a captain (CPT) with a date of rank (DOR) of 27 August 2010 * he should have been considered for promotion to MAJ on the September 2013 and March 2014 Position Vacancy Promotion Boards 3. On 12 August 2014, the ABCMR corrected the applicant's record to show he was granted Federal recognition as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017840

    Original file (20130017840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 11A (Infantry) [or AOC 53A (Automation Officer)]. The applicant indicated that he was eligible for a CSRB and that he would complete 6 years of commissioned service on 8 March 2009; the applicant was advised that he did not have to wait until 8 March 2009 to complete the agreement; he was provided instructions to place his initials in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021123

    Original file (20120021123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Paragraph 2-2 states the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is that date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. Title 10, U.S.C., section 12211(b), states when an officer granted temporary Federal recognition in the ARNG is appointed in the U. S. Army Reserve, his or her appointment date will bear the date of the temporary Federal Recognition. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003467

    Original file (20090003467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 April 1991, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to recommend him for involuntary separation from the AGR program for his failure to complete the professional development program (PDP) (completion of the Primary Leadership Development Course) as required by paragraph 6-4a(8) of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-5 (The Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) program, Title 32, Full-Time National Guard Duty FTNGD)). The applicant's records show he was honorably released...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015916

    Original file (20060015916.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The results of this request are not available for review with this application. Records show that after several appeal attempts the applicant was involuntarily separated from his AGR position on 31 January 2002 and reverted to a unit member of the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG). There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows that the DD Form 214 issued at the time of his removal from the AGR program was prepared incorrectly or otherwise flawed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017286

    Original file (20130017286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A year later, his brother told him Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 19 (Qualitative Management Program (QMP)), stated each Soldier would get copy of the board proceedings and they could appeal. Memorandum, dated 5 November 2010, wherein he stated he had reviewed his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and, if not selected for retention, he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve and that he wanted to be allowed to achieve 20 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008606

    Original file (20120008606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States) * NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office), dated 31 July 2008 * 2 NGB Forms 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), dated 31 July 2008 and 27 August 2010 * Orders Number 217-1036, Joint...