Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021123
Original file (20120021123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  25 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120021123 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an adjustment of her initial effective date of appointment to second lieutenant (2LT) in the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) from 6 October 2011 to 18 November 2009.

2.  The applicant states she received a direct commission as a chaplain candidate on 18 November 2009. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her original initial appointment packet. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 17 September 2009, a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB) recommended that the applicant be granted Federal recognition.

2.  On 17 November 2009, the applicant executed an oath of office as a Reserve commissioned officer.  On the same date she executed an oath of office for an appointment in the INARNG.

3.  Orders Number 349-1184, issued by the Joint Force Headquarters – Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, dated 15 December 2009, show the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition as a 2LT with an effective date of 30 September 2009.

4.  Orders Number 363-006, issued by the Joint Force Headquarters – Indiana, dated 29 December 2010, ordered the applicant to active duty for completion of Chaplain Initial Military Training during the period 9 January to 4 February 2011.

5.  Orders Number 168-042, issued by the Joint Force Headquarters – Indiana, dated 17 June 2011, show the applicant was ordered to active duty for completion of the Chaplain Basic Officer Leader Course during the period 2 July to 19 August 2011.

6.  On 17 May 2012, the National Guard Bureau (NGB) published Special Orders Number 182 AR, extending her Federal recognition for her initial appointment as a 2LT, effective 6 October 2011.

7.  On 20 November 2012, an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB in the processing of this case.  The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant’s request to adjust her initial appointment date to 17 November 2009.  The official stated that due to an administrative error, the applicant was never granted Federal recognition.  The State concurred with the recommendation.

8.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for information/rebuttal but she did not respond in the allotted time.

9.  National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition.

	a.  Paragraph 2-1 states commissioned officers of the ARNG are appointed by the several States under Article 1, section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.  These appointments may be federally recognized by the Chief, NGB under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe and under the provisions of this regulation.  Officers who are federally recognized in a particular grade and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve commissioned officers of the Army with assignment to the ARNG of the United States if they have not already accepted such appointment.

	b.  Paragraph 2-2 states the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is that date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State.  Paragraph 2-3a states that temporary Federal recognition upon initial appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in their federally recognized status.

	c.  Paragraph 2-13 states temporary Federal recognition may be extended to an officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by an FREB pending final determination of eligibility and appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army.  If not sooner withdrawn or replaced by the granting of permanent Federal recognition, temporary Federal recognition will automatically terminate six months after the effective date of State appointment.  However, should the initial period of temporary Federal recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent FREB should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal recognition if warranted.

	d.  Paragraph 10-15b states temporary Federal recognition may be granted by an FREB to those eligible when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment to a position vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the ARNG.  The FREB will forward the NGB Form 89 (ARNG Proceedings of a FREB) and allied documents to the Adjutant General.  When the member is favorably recommended, the Adjutant General will endorse the packet to the NGB.  If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified.

10.  Title 32(United States Code (U.S.C.)), section 308, (Federal recognition of officers:  temporary recognition) allows the Secretary of the Army to extend temporary Federal recognition as an officer of the Army National Guard to any person who has passed the examination prescribed in Title 10, U.S.C., section 307(b), pending his or her appointment as a Reserve officer of the Army.  The statute allows for temporary Federal recognition to be extended up to a year.  The statute does not expressly prohibit extension of additional periods of temporary Federal recognition.  

11.  Title 10, U.S.C., section 12211(b), states when an officer granted temporary Federal recognition in the ARNG is appointed in the U. S. Army Reserve, his or her appointment date will bear the date of the temporary Federal Recognition.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that her Federal recognition appointment date should be 17 November 2009 instead of 6 October 2011 was carefully considered.

2.  It is clear that an administrative error denied her Federal recognition effective 17 November 2009.  Based on applicable law and regulation, she is entitled to have her Federal recognition orders amended to show the effective date of permanent Federal recognition in the rank of 2LT as 17 November 2009.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 182 AR, dated 17 May 2011, to show she was extended Federal recognition in the rank of 2LT effective 17 November 2009.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021123



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021123



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004594

    Original file (20110004594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Should the initial period of temporary Federal recognition expire due to administrative processing delays though no fault of the applicant, a subsequent Federal recognition board should be convened and another period of temporary Federal recognition granted, if warranted." Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her records to show she was extended Federal recognition effective 13 December 2008 with a DOR to 2LT of 13 December 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022250

    Original file (20100022250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. National Guard Regulation (Army Regulation) 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions ), paragraph 8-8(a), provides "A commissioned officer must complete the minimum years of promotion service prior to being considered for promotion and Federal recognition in the higher grade. The evidence of record shows the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 22 December 2006 upon his initial appointment in the INARNG and execution of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001447

    Original file (20110001447.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 September 2010, NGB Special Orders Number 193 AR extended him Federal recognition for initial appointment in the ARNG with an effective date and DOR of 25 March 2010. a. Paragraph 2-2 states that the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is the date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 10 May 2008 upon his initial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010805

    Original file (20100010805.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant's records show he submitted an NGB Form 62 (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard Officer) on 9 April 2007 and he was appointed a 2LT in the INARNG and executed an oath of office on 9 August 2007. The evidence of record shows he was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 9 August 2007 upon his initial appointment in the INARNG and execution of the oath of office. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010804

    Original file (20100010804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received permanent Federal recognition as a 2LT from NGB within the 6-month period required by National Guard/Army regulations. Based on the initial appointment guidance found in National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), the advisory opinion recommended the applicant's initial appointment date be adjusted to 8 July 2007, he be promoted to first lieutenant (1LT) effective 8 July 2009, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021511

    Original file (20130021511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was extended Federal recognition effective the date of his original appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG). Therefore, based on the applicable law and regulation his record should be corrected to show he received an extension of temporary Federal recognition and NGB Federal Recognition Special Orders should be published showing an effective date of permanent Federal recognition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009153

    Original file (20110009153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant's record shows he submitted an NGB Form 62 (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard Officer) and he executed an oath of office on 15 May 2009. However, his records do not show he was granted Federal recognition for this initial appointment. National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003077

    Original file (20130003077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The orders state the effective date of promotion in the Reserve of the Army and corresponding DOR would be the date the Chief, NGB extends Federal Recognition of state promotion. The Personnel Branch Officer requested the applicant's initial appointment be backdated to 6 May 2011 and that he be promoted and extended Federal recognition to 1LT effective 6 November 2012 without further delay. Therefore, his record should be corrected to show he received an extension of temporary Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000099

    Original file (20110000099.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provides: * her OCS Diploma * her appointment memorandum, dated 12 March 2009 * a DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel), dated 12 March 2009 * a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)), dated 26 May 2010 * an NGB 337 (Oaths of Office), dated 25 June 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military records show she was appointed in the PRARNG as a second lieutenant (2LT), effective 12 March 2009, and extended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021544

    Original file (20130021544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also on 3 August 2011, the applicant executed an oath office, at Ann Arbor, MI, recording the date of acceptance of appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army on that date. a. Paragraph 2-2 states that the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is the date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant executed an NGB Form 337 for appointment in the State on 21 September...